Why do avian responses to change in Arctic green-up vary?

Global climate change has altered the timing of seasonal events (i.e., phenology) for a diverse range of biota. Within and among species, however, the degree to which alterations in phenology match climate variability differ substantially. To better understand factors driving these differences, we e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global Change Biology
Main Authors: Tavera, Eveling A., Lank, David B., Douglas, David C., Sandercock, Brett Kevin, Lanctot, Richard B., Schmidt, Niels M., Reneerkens, Jeroen, Ward, David H., Bêty, Joël, Kwon, Eunbi, Lecomte, Nicolas, Gratto-Trevor, Cheri L., Smith, Paul A., English, Willow B., Saalfeld, Sarah T., Brown, Stephen C., Gates, H. River, Nol, Erica, Liebezeit, Joseph R., McGuire, Rebecca L., McKinnon, Laura, Kendall, Steve, Robards, Martin, Boldenow, Megan, Payer, David C., Rausch, Jennie, Solovyeva, Diana V., Stalwick, Jordyn A., Gurney, Kirsty E.B.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3132065
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17335
id ftninstnf:oai:brage.nina.no:11250/3132065
record_format openpolar
spelling ftninstnf:oai:brage.nina.no:11250/3132065 2024-06-23T07:50:17+00:00 Why do avian responses to change in Arctic green-up vary? Tavera, Eveling A. Lank, David B. Douglas, David C. Sandercock, Brett Kevin Lanctot, Richard B. Schmidt, Niels M. Reneerkens, Jeroen Ward, David H. Bêty, Joël Kwon, Eunbi Lecomte, Nicolas Gratto-Trevor, Cheri L. Smith, Paul A. English, Willow B. Saalfeld, Sarah T. Brown, Stephen C. Gates, H. River Nol, Erica Liebezeit, Joseph R. McGuire, Rebecca L. McKinnon, Laura Kendall, Steve Robards, Martin Boldenow, Megan Payer, David C. Rausch, Jennie Solovyeva, Diana V. Stalwick, Jordyn A. Gurney, Kirsty E.B. 2024 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3132065 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17335 eng eng urn:issn:1354-1013 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3132065 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17335 cristin:2270204 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no © 2024 His Majesty the King in Right of Canada 30 Global Change Biology e17335 climate change migration NDVI nest initiation phenology shorebirds VDP::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480 VDP::Zoology and botany: 480 Peer reviewed Journal article 2024 ftninstnf https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17335 2024-06-07T04:11:00Z Global climate change has altered the timing of seasonal events (i.e., phenology) for a diverse range of biota. Within and among species, however, the degree to which alterations in phenology match climate variability differ substantially. To better understand factors driving these differences, we evaluated variation in timing of nesting of eight Arctic-breeding shorebird species at 18 sites over a 23-year period. We used the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index as a proxy to determine the start of spring (SOS) growing season and quantified relationships between SOS and nest initiation dates as a measure of phenological responsiveness. Among species, we tested four life history traits (migration distance, seasonal timing of breeding, female body mass, expected female reproductive effort) as species-level predictors of responsiveness. For one species (Semipalmated Sandpiper), we also evaluated whether responsiveness varied across sites. Although no species in our study completely tracked annual variation in SOS, phenological responses were strongest for Western Sandpipers, Pectoral Sandpipers, and Red Phalaropes. Migration distance was the strongest additional predictor of responsiveness, with longer-distance migrant species generally tracking variation in SOS more closely than species that migrate shorter distances. Semipalmated Sandpipers are a widely distributed species, but adjustments in timing of nesting relative to variability in SOS did not vary across sites, suggesting that different breeding populations of this species were equally responsive to climate cues despite differing migration strategies. Our results unexpectedly show that long-distance migrants are more sensitive to local environmental conditions, which may help them to adapt to ongoing changes in climate. climate change, migration, NDVI, nest initiation, phenology, shorebirds publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Climate change Norwegian Institute for Nature Research: Brage NINA Arctic Global Change Biology 30 5
institution Open Polar
collection Norwegian Institute for Nature Research: Brage NINA
op_collection_id ftninstnf
language English
topic climate change
migration
NDVI
nest initiation
phenology
shorebirds
VDP::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480
VDP::Zoology and botany: 480
spellingShingle climate change
migration
NDVI
nest initiation
phenology
shorebirds
VDP::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480
VDP::Zoology and botany: 480
Tavera, Eveling A.
Lank, David B.
Douglas, David C.
Sandercock, Brett Kevin
Lanctot, Richard B.
Schmidt, Niels M.
Reneerkens, Jeroen
Ward, David H.
Bêty, Joël
Kwon, Eunbi
Lecomte, Nicolas
Gratto-Trevor, Cheri L.
Smith, Paul A.
English, Willow B.
Saalfeld, Sarah T.
Brown, Stephen C.
Gates, H. River
Nol, Erica
Liebezeit, Joseph R.
McGuire, Rebecca L.
McKinnon, Laura
Kendall, Steve
Robards, Martin
Boldenow, Megan
Payer, David C.
Rausch, Jennie
Solovyeva, Diana V.
Stalwick, Jordyn A.
Gurney, Kirsty E.B.
Why do avian responses to change in Arctic green-up vary?
topic_facet climate change
migration
NDVI
nest initiation
phenology
shorebirds
VDP::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480
VDP::Zoology and botany: 480
description Global climate change has altered the timing of seasonal events (i.e., phenology) for a diverse range of biota. Within and among species, however, the degree to which alterations in phenology match climate variability differ substantially. To better understand factors driving these differences, we evaluated variation in timing of nesting of eight Arctic-breeding shorebird species at 18 sites over a 23-year period. We used the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index as a proxy to determine the start of spring (SOS) growing season and quantified relationships between SOS and nest initiation dates as a measure of phenological responsiveness. Among species, we tested four life history traits (migration distance, seasonal timing of breeding, female body mass, expected female reproductive effort) as species-level predictors of responsiveness. For one species (Semipalmated Sandpiper), we also evaluated whether responsiveness varied across sites. Although no species in our study completely tracked annual variation in SOS, phenological responses were strongest for Western Sandpipers, Pectoral Sandpipers, and Red Phalaropes. Migration distance was the strongest additional predictor of responsiveness, with longer-distance migrant species generally tracking variation in SOS more closely than species that migrate shorter distances. Semipalmated Sandpipers are a widely distributed species, but adjustments in timing of nesting relative to variability in SOS did not vary across sites, suggesting that different breeding populations of this species were equally responsive to climate cues despite differing migration strategies. Our results unexpectedly show that long-distance migrants are more sensitive to local environmental conditions, which may help them to adapt to ongoing changes in climate. climate change, migration, NDVI, nest initiation, phenology, shorebirds publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Tavera, Eveling A.
Lank, David B.
Douglas, David C.
Sandercock, Brett Kevin
Lanctot, Richard B.
Schmidt, Niels M.
Reneerkens, Jeroen
Ward, David H.
Bêty, Joël
Kwon, Eunbi
Lecomte, Nicolas
Gratto-Trevor, Cheri L.
Smith, Paul A.
English, Willow B.
Saalfeld, Sarah T.
Brown, Stephen C.
Gates, H. River
Nol, Erica
Liebezeit, Joseph R.
McGuire, Rebecca L.
McKinnon, Laura
Kendall, Steve
Robards, Martin
Boldenow, Megan
Payer, David C.
Rausch, Jennie
Solovyeva, Diana V.
Stalwick, Jordyn A.
Gurney, Kirsty E.B.
author_facet Tavera, Eveling A.
Lank, David B.
Douglas, David C.
Sandercock, Brett Kevin
Lanctot, Richard B.
Schmidt, Niels M.
Reneerkens, Jeroen
Ward, David H.
Bêty, Joël
Kwon, Eunbi
Lecomte, Nicolas
Gratto-Trevor, Cheri L.
Smith, Paul A.
English, Willow B.
Saalfeld, Sarah T.
Brown, Stephen C.
Gates, H. River
Nol, Erica
Liebezeit, Joseph R.
McGuire, Rebecca L.
McKinnon, Laura
Kendall, Steve
Robards, Martin
Boldenow, Megan
Payer, David C.
Rausch, Jennie
Solovyeva, Diana V.
Stalwick, Jordyn A.
Gurney, Kirsty E.B.
author_sort Tavera, Eveling A.
title Why do avian responses to change in Arctic green-up vary?
title_short Why do avian responses to change in Arctic green-up vary?
title_full Why do avian responses to change in Arctic green-up vary?
title_fullStr Why do avian responses to change in Arctic green-up vary?
title_full_unstemmed Why do avian responses to change in Arctic green-up vary?
title_sort why do avian responses to change in arctic green-up vary?
publishDate 2024
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3132065
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17335
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
op_source 30
Global Change Biology
e17335
op_relation urn:issn:1354-1013
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3132065
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17335
cristin:2270204
op_rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no
© 2024 His Majesty the King in Right of Canada
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17335
container_title Global Change Biology
container_volume 30
container_issue 5
_version_ 1802641147805302784