Hunting migratory geese: is there an optimal practice?

Since the mid-20th century, many European and North American goose populations have increased dramatically in numbers, causing conflict with agricultural interests in their staging and wintering areas. In some cases, to mitigate such impacts of rapid population increases, population control has been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wildlife Biology
Main Authors: Jensen, Gitte Høj, Madsen, Jesper, Tombre, Ingunn
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2407542
https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00162
id ftninstnf:oai:brage.nina.no:11250/2407542
record_format openpolar
spelling ftninstnf:oai:brage.nina.no:11250/2407542 2023-05-15T13:29:58+02:00 Hunting migratory geese: is there an optimal practice? Jensen, Gitte Høj Madsen, Jesper Tombre, Ingunn Europe North America Europa Nord-Amerika 2016 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2407542 https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00162 eng eng Wildlife Biology 2016, 22:194-203 urn:issn:0909-6396 http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2407542 https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00162 cristin:1378667 Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell-IngenBearbeidelse 3.0 Norge http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/no/ CC-BY-NC-ND 194-203 22 Wildlife Biology Journal article Peer reviewed 2016 ftninstnf https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00162 2021-12-23T07:17:15Z Since the mid-20th century, many European and North American goose populations have increased dramatically in numbers, causing conflict with agricultural interests in their staging and wintering areas. In some cases, to mitigate such impacts of rapid population increases, population control has been attempted by increasing harvest rate. In this study, we investigated how autumn-staging pink-footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus responded to hunting, with a view to determine hunting practice that would lead to an increase in the hunting bag. There was a significant increase in the distance between the hunting site and the goose flocks, on comparing goose distribution on the day before the hunt up to one day after the hunt. The effect was significant when at least 10 shots were fired per site but not when 1–10 shots were fired. The timing of shooting in relation to migratory phenology did not affect the time taken by the geese to return to the hunting site, but after a hunt in the early part of the staging season, the number of geese in the study area increased more rapidly than towards the end of the season. The maximum number of geese shot per hunting event was obtained when hunting events were separated by three days. Our results indicate that hunters can increase local harvest by temporal and spatial optimisation of practices. These results may be used as a tool in wider-scale regional and international processes to regulate the population size of pink-footed geese by shooting, depending on the willingness of landowners, hunters and managers to coordinate hunting practices. Article in Journal/Newspaper Anser brachyrhynchus Norwegian Institute for Nature Research: Brage NINA Wildlife Biology 22 5 194 203
institution Open Polar
collection Norwegian Institute for Nature Research: Brage NINA
op_collection_id ftninstnf
language English
description Since the mid-20th century, many European and North American goose populations have increased dramatically in numbers, causing conflict with agricultural interests in their staging and wintering areas. In some cases, to mitigate such impacts of rapid population increases, population control has been attempted by increasing harvest rate. In this study, we investigated how autumn-staging pink-footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus responded to hunting, with a view to determine hunting practice that would lead to an increase in the hunting bag. There was a significant increase in the distance between the hunting site and the goose flocks, on comparing goose distribution on the day before the hunt up to one day after the hunt. The effect was significant when at least 10 shots were fired per site but not when 1–10 shots were fired. The timing of shooting in relation to migratory phenology did not affect the time taken by the geese to return to the hunting site, but after a hunt in the early part of the staging season, the number of geese in the study area increased more rapidly than towards the end of the season. The maximum number of geese shot per hunting event was obtained when hunting events were separated by three days. Our results indicate that hunters can increase local harvest by temporal and spatial optimisation of practices. These results may be used as a tool in wider-scale regional and international processes to regulate the population size of pink-footed geese by shooting, depending on the willingness of landowners, hunters and managers to coordinate hunting practices.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jensen, Gitte Høj
Madsen, Jesper
Tombre, Ingunn
spellingShingle Jensen, Gitte Høj
Madsen, Jesper
Tombre, Ingunn
Hunting migratory geese: is there an optimal practice?
author_facet Jensen, Gitte Høj
Madsen, Jesper
Tombre, Ingunn
author_sort Jensen, Gitte Høj
title Hunting migratory geese: is there an optimal practice?
title_short Hunting migratory geese: is there an optimal practice?
title_full Hunting migratory geese: is there an optimal practice?
title_fullStr Hunting migratory geese: is there an optimal practice?
title_full_unstemmed Hunting migratory geese: is there an optimal practice?
title_sort hunting migratory geese: is there an optimal practice?
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2407542
https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00162
op_coverage Europe North America Europa Nord-Amerika
genre Anser brachyrhynchus
genre_facet Anser brachyrhynchus
op_source 194-203
22
Wildlife Biology
op_relation Wildlife Biology 2016, 22:194-203
urn:issn:0909-6396
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2407542
https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00162
cristin:1378667
op_rights Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell-IngenBearbeidelse 3.0 Norge
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/no/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00162
container_title Wildlife Biology
container_volume 22
container_issue 5
container_start_page 194
op_container_end_page 203
_version_ 1766004555043045376