Snow thickness profiling on Antarctic sea ice with GPR—Rapid and accurate measurements with the potential to upscale needles to a haystack

Snow thickness on sea ice is a largely undersampled parameter yet of importance for the sea ice mass balance and for satellite-based sea ice thickness estimates and thus our general understanding of global ice volume change. Traditional direct thickness measurements with meter sticks can provide acc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Pfaffhuber, Andreas Aspmo, Lieser, Jan L., Haas, Christian
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2451679
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074202
id ftngicom:oai:brage.bibsys.no:11250/2451679
record_format openpolar
spelling ftngicom:oai:brage.bibsys.no:11250/2451679 2023-05-15T14:02:21+02:00 Snow thickness profiling on Antarctic sea ice with GPR—Rapid and accurate measurements with the potential to upscale needles to a haystack Pfaffhuber, Andreas Aspmo Lieser, Jan L. Haas, Christian 2017-08-24T07:26:12Z http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2451679 https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074202 eng eng urn:issn:0094-8276 http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2451679 https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074202 cristin:1487649 44 Geophysical Research Letters Peer reviewed Journal article 2017 ftngicom https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074202 2018-09-20T09:19:49Z Snow thickness on sea ice is a largely undersampled parameter yet of importance for the sea ice mass balance and for satellite-based sea ice thickness estimates and thus our general understanding of global ice volume change. Traditional direct thickness measurements with meter sticks can provide accurate but only spot information, referred to as “needles” due to their pinpoint focus and information, while airborne and satellite remote sensing snow products, referred to as “the haystack,” have large uncertainties due to their scale. We demonstrate the remarkable accuracy and applicability of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) snow thickness measurements by comparing them with in situ meter stick data from two field campaigns to Antarctica in late winter/early spring. The efficiency and millimeter-to-centimeter accuracy of GPR enables practitioners to acquire extensive, semiregional data with the potential to upscale needles to the haystack and to potentially calibrate satellite remote sensing products that we confirm to derive roughly 30% of the in situ thickness. We find the radar wave propagation velocity in snow to be rather constant (± 6%), encouraging regional snow thickness surveys. Snow thinner than 10 cm is under the detection limit with the off-the-shelf GPR setup utilized in our study. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Sea ice Unknown Antarctic Haystack ENVELOPE(-19.392,-19.392,75.726,75.726) Geophysical Research Letters 44 15 7836 7844
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftngicom
language English
description Snow thickness on sea ice is a largely undersampled parameter yet of importance for the sea ice mass balance and for satellite-based sea ice thickness estimates and thus our general understanding of global ice volume change. Traditional direct thickness measurements with meter sticks can provide accurate but only spot information, referred to as “needles” due to their pinpoint focus and information, while airborne and satellite remote sensing snow products, referred to as “the haystack,” have large uncertainties due to their scale. We demonstrate the remarkable accuracy and applicability of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) snow thickness measurements by comparing them with in situ meter stick data from two field campaigns to Antarctica in late winter/early spring. The efficiency and millimeter-to-centimeter accuracy of GPR enables practitioners to acquire extensive, semiregional data with the potential to upscale needles to the haystack and to potentially calibrate satellite remote sensing products that we confirm to derive roughly 30% of the in situ thickness. We find the radar wave propagation velocity in snow to be rather constant (± 6%), encouraging regional snow thickness surveys. Snow thinner than 10 cm is under the detection limit with the off-the-shelf GPR setup utilized in our study. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Pfaffhuber, Andreas Aspmo
Lieser, Jan L.
Haas, Christian
spellingShingle Pfaffhuber, Andreas Aspmo
Lieser, Jan L.
Haas, Christian
Snow thickness profiling on Antarctic sea ice with GPR—Rapid and accurate measurements with the potential to upscale needles to a haystack
author_facet Pfaffhuber, Andreas Aspmo
Lieser, Jan L.
Haas, Christian
author_sort Pfaffhuber, Andreas Aspmo
title Snow thickness profiling on Antarctic sea ice with GPR—Rapid and accurate measurements with the potential to upscale needles to a haystack
title_short Snow thickness profiling on Antarctic sea ice with GPR—Rapid and accurate measurements with the potential to upscale needles to a haystack
title_full Snow thickness profiling on Antarctic sea ice with GPR—Rapid and accurate measurements with the potential to upscale needles to a haystack
title_fullStr Snow thickness profiling on Antarctic sea ice with GPR—Rapid and accurate measurements with the potential to upscale needles to a haystack
title_full_unstemmed Snow thickness profiling on Antarctic sea ice with GPR—Rapid and accurate measurements with the potential to upscale needles to a haystack
title_sort snow thickness profiling on antarctic sea ice with gpr—rapid and accurate measurements with the potential to upscale needles to a haystack
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2451679
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074202
long_lat ENVELOPE(-19.392,-19.392,75.726,75.726)
geographic Antarctic
Haystack
geographic_facet Antarctic
Haystack
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Sea ice
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Sea ice
op_source 44
Geophysical Research Letters
op_relation urn:issn:0094-8276
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2451679
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074202
cristin:1487649
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074202
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 44
container_issue 15
container_start_page 7836
op_container_end_page 7844
_version_ 1766272587598397440