Assessing the importance of individual- and colony-level variation when using seabird foraging ranges as impact assessment and conservation tools

Knowledge of seabird distributions plays a key role in seabird conservation and sustainable marine management, underpinning efforts to designate protected areas or assess the impact of human developments. Technological advances in animal tracking devices increasingly allow researchers to acquire inf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ibis
Main Authors: Cleasby, Ian R., Owen, Ellie, Butler, Adam, Baer, Julia, Blackburn, Jez, Bogdanova, Maria I., Coledale, Tessa, Daunt, Francis, Dodd, Stephen, Evans, Julian C., Green, Jonathan A., Guilford, Tim, Harris, Mike P., Hughes, Robert, Newell, Mark A., Newton, Stephen F., Robertson, Gail S., Ruffino, Lise, Shoji, Akiko, Soanes, Louise M., Votier, Stephen C., Wakefield, Ewan D., Wanless, Sarah, Wilson, Linda J., Bolton, Mark
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/536160/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/536160/1/Ibis%20-%202023%20-%20Cleasby%20-%20Assessing%20the%20importance%20of%20individual%E2%80%90%20and%20colony%E2%80%90level%20variation%20when%20using%20seabird%20foraging.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13284
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:536160
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language English
topic Marine Sciences
Zoology
Data and Information
spellingShingle Marine Sciences
Zoology
Data and Information
Cleasby, Ian R.
Owen, Ellie
Butler, Adam
Baer, Julia
Blackburn, Jez
Bogdanova, Maria I.
Coledale, Tessa
Daunt, Francis
Dodd, Stephen
Evans, Julian C.
Green, Jonathan A.
Guilford, Tim
Harris, Mike P.
Hughes, Robert
Newell, Mark A.
Newton, Stephen F.
Robertson, Gail S.
Ruffino, Lise
Shoji, Akiko
Soanes, Louise M.
Votier, Stephen C.
Wakefield, Ewan D.
Wanless, Sarah
Wilson, Linda J.
Bolton, Mark
Assessing the importance of individual- and colony-level variation when using seabird foraging ranges as impact assessment and conservation tools
topic_facet Marine Sciences
Zoology
Data and Information
description Knowledge of seabird distributions plays a key role in seabird conservation and sustainable marine management, underpinning efforts to designate protected areas or assess the impact of human developments. Technological advances in animal tracking devices increasingly allow researchers to acquire information on the movement of birds from specific colonies. Nevertheless, most seabird colonies have not been subject to such tracking and another means must be found to assess their likely foraging distribution. Consequently, foraging range data collated and summarized across other tracking studies has often been used to estimate species-level foraging distances for use within applied settings. However, generic species-specific foraging ranges must be used with caution due to the amount of variation in seabird foraging behaviour at both the individual and colony level. Specifically, while current reviews of seabird foraging ranges provide summary estimates of maximum foraging range, they typically do not assess the extent of among-colony or among-individual variation around such estimates. To address this, we conducted a variance component analysis of the maximum distance reached from the breeding colony per foraging trip (foraging range) using multi-colony tracking datasets to estimate the degree of between-individual, between-year, and between-colony variation in foraging range in four UK breeding seabirds (Black-legged Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla, Common Guillemot Uria aalge, Razorbill Alca torda & European Shag Gulosus aristotelis). We also provide updated estimates of typical foraging ranges for each species and quantified the influence of breeding stage and colony size. Overall, between-colony variation was typically the largest variance component, explaining 20% - 30% of the observed variation in foraging range across the four species. Individual-level variation was also relatively large among Shags. In Kittiwake, Guillemot, and Shag, but not Razorbill, average foraging ranges were positively associated with ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cleasby, Ian R.
Owen, Ellie
Butler, Adam
Baer, Julia
Blackburn, Jez
Bogdanova, Maria I.
Coledale, Tessa
Daunt, Francis
Dodd, Stephen
Evans, Julian C.
Green, Jonathan A.
Guilford, Tim
Harris, Mike P.
Hughes, Robert
Newell, Mark A.
Newton, Stephen F.
Robertson, Gail S.
Ruffino, Lise
Shoji, Akiko
Soanes, Louise M.
Votier, Stephen C.
Wakefield, Ewan D.
Wanless, Sarah
Wilson, Linda J.
Bolton, Mark
author_facet Cleasby, Ian R.
Owen, Ellie
Butler, Adam
Baer, Julia
Blackburn, Jez
Bogdanova, Maria I.
Coledale, Tessa
Daunt, Francis
Dodd, Stephen
Evans, Julian C.
Green, Jonathan A.
Guilford, Tim
Harris, Mike P.
Hughes, Robert
Newell, Mark A.
Newton, Stephen F.
Robertson, Gail S.
Ruffino, Lise
Shoji, Akiko
Soanes, Louise M.
Votier, Stephen C.
Wakefield, Ewan D.
Wanless, Sarah
Wilson, Linda J.
Bolton, Mark
author_sort Cleasby, Ian R.
title Assessing the importance of individual- and colony-level variation when using seabird foraging ranges as impact assessment and conservation tools
title_short Assessing the importance of individual- and colony-level variation when using seabird foraging ranges as impact assessment and conservation tools
title_full Assessing the importance of individual- and colony-level variation when using seabird foraging ranges as impact assessment and conservation tools
title_fullStr Assessing the importance of individual- and colony-level variation when using seabird foraging ranges as impact assessment and conservation tools
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the importance of individual- and colony-level variation when using seabird foraging ranges as impact assessment and conservation tools
title_sort assessing the importance of individual- and colony-level variation when using seabird foraging ranges as impact assessment and conservation tools
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2023
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/536160/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/536160/1/Ibis%20-%202023%20-%20Cleasby%20-%20Assessing%20the%20importance%20of%20individual%E2%80%90%20and%20colony%E2%80%90level%20variation%20when%20using%20seabird%20foraging.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13284
genre Alca torda
Black-legged Kittiwake
common guillemot
Razorbill
rissa tridactyla
Uria aalge
uria
genre_facet Alca torda
Black-legged Kittiwake
common guillemot
Razorbill
rissa tridactyla
Uria aalge
uria
op_relation https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/536160/1/Ibis%20-%202023%20-%20Cleasby%20-%20Assessing%20the%20importance%20of%20individual%E2%80%90%20and%20colony%E2%80%90level%20variation%20when%20using%20seabird%20foraging.pdf
Cleasby, Ian R.; Owen, Ellie; Butler, Adam; Baer, Julia; Blackburn, Jez; Bogdanova, Maria I.; Coledale, Tessa; Daunt, Francis orcid:0000-0003-4638-3388
Dodd, Stephen; Evans, Julian C.; Green, Jonathan A.; Guilford, Tim; Harris, Mike P.; Hughes, Robert; Newell, Mark A.; Newton, Stephen F.; Robertson, Gail S.; Ruffino, Lise; Shoji, Akiko; Soanes, Louise M.; Votier, Stephen C.; Wakefield, Ewan D.; Wanless, Sarah; Wilson, Linda J.; Bolton, Mark. 2023 Assessing the importance of individual- and colony-level variation when using seabird foraging ranges as impact assessment and conservation tools. Ibis. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13284 <https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13284>
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13284
container_title Ibis
_version_ 1785531999338889216
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:536160 2023-12-17T10:18:00+01:00 Assessing the importance of individual- and colony-level variation when using seabird foraging ranges as impact assessment and conservation tools Cleasby, Ian R. Owen, Ellie Butler, Adam Baer, Julia Blackburn, Jez Bogdanova, Maria I. Coledale, Tessa Daunt, Francis Dodd, Stephen Evans, Julian C. Green, Jonathan A. Guilford, Tim Harris, Mike P. Hughes, Robert Newell, Mark A. Newton, Stephen F. Robertson, Gail S. Ruffino, Lise Shoji, Akiko Soanes, Louise M. Votier, Stephen C. Wakefield, Ewan D. Wanless, Sarah Wilson, Linda J. Bolton, Mark 2023-10-17 text http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/536160/ https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/536160/1/Ibis%20-%202023%20-%20Cleasby%20-%20Assessing%20the%20importance%20of%20individual%E2%80%90%20and%20colony%E2%80%90level%20variation%20when%20using%20seabird%20foraging.pdf https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13284 en eng Wiley https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/536160/1/Ibis%20-%202023%20-%20Cleasby%20-%20Assessing%20the%20importance%20of%20individual%E2%80%90%20and%20colony%E2%80%90level%20variation%20when%20using%20seabird%20foraging.pdf Cleasby, Ian R.; Owen, Ellie; Butler, Adam; Baer, Julia; Blackburn, Jez; Bogdanova, Maria I.; Coledale, Tessa; Daunt, Francis orcid:0000-0003-4638-3388 Dodd, Stephen; Evans, Julian C.; Green, Jonathan A.; Guilford, Tim; Harris, Mike P.; Hughes, Robert; Newell, Mark A.; Newton, Stephen F.; Robertson, Gail S.; Ruffino, Lise; Shoji, Akiko; Soanes, Louise M.; Votier, Stephen C.; Wakefield, Ewan D.; Wanless, Sarah; Wilson, Linda J.; Bolton, Mark. 2023 Assessing the importance of individual- and colony-level variation when using seabird foraging ranges as impact assessment and conservation tools. Ibis. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13284 <https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13284> Marine Sciences Zoology Data and Information Publication - Article PeerReviewed 2023 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13284 2023-11-17T00:03:33Z Knowledge of seabird distributions plays a key role in seabird conservation and sustainable marine management, underpinning efforts to designate protected areas or assess the impact of human developments. Technological advances in animal tracking devices increasingly allow researchers to acquire information on the movement of birds from specific colonies. Nevertheless, most seabird colonies have not been subject to such tracking and another means must be found to assess their likely foraging distribution. Consequently, foraging range data collated and summarized across other tracking studies has often been used to estimate species-level foraging distances for use within applied settings. However, generic species-specific foraging ranges must be used with caution due to the amount of variation in seabird foraging behaviour at both the individual and colony level. Specifically, while current reviews of seabird foraging ranges provide summary estimates of maximum foraging range, they typically do not assess the extent of among-colony or among-individual variation around such estimates. To address this, we conducted a variance component analysis of the maximum distance reached from the breeding colony per foraging trip (foraging range) using multi-colony tracking datasets to estimate the degree of between-individual, between-year, and between-colony variation in foraging range in four UK breeding seabirds (Black-legged Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla, Common Guillemot Uria aalge, Razorbill Alca torda & European Shag Gulosus aristotelis). We also provide updated estimates of typical foraging ranges for each species and quantified the influence of breeding stage and colony size. Overall, between-colony variation was typically the largest variance component, explaining 20% - 30% of the observed variation in foraging range across the four species. Individual-level variation was also relatively large among Shags. In Kittiwake, Guillemot, and Shag, but not Razorbill, average foraging ranges were positively associated with ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Alca torda Black-legged Kittiwake common guillemot Razorbill rissa tridactyla Uria aalge uria Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Ibis