Quantifying the effect of wind on volcanic plumes: implications for plume modeling

The considerable effects that wind can have on estimates of mass eruption rates (MERs) in explosive eruptions based on volcanic plume height are well known but difficult to quantify rigorously. Many explicitly wind-affected plume models have the additional difficulty that they require the use of cen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Main Authors: Dürig, Tobias, Gudmundsson, Magnús T., Dioguardi, Fabio, Schmidt, Louise Steffensen
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/534117/
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037781
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:534117
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:534117 2023-05-15T16:09:38+02:00 Quantifying the effect of wind on volcanic plumes: implications for plume modeling Dürig, Tobias Gudmundsson, Magnús T. Dioguardi, Fabio Schmidt, Louise Steffensen 2023-01-27 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/534117/ https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037781 unknown Dürig, Tobias; Gudmundsson, Magnús T.; Dioguardi, Fabio; Schmidt, Louise Steffensen. 2023 Quantifying the effect of wind on volcanic plumes: implications for plume modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 128 (2), e2022JD037781. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037781 <https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037781> Publication - Article PeerReviewed 2023 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037781 2023-03-10T00:02:30Z The considerable effects that wind can have on estimates of mass eruption rates (MERs) in explosive eruptions based on volcanic plume height are well known but difficult to quantify rigorously. Many explicitly wind-affected plume models have the additional difficulty that they require the use of centerline heights of bent-over plumes, a parameter not easily obtained directly from observational data. We tested two such models by using the time series of varying plume heights and windspeeds of the 2010 eruption. The mapped fallout and photos taken during this eruption allow us to estimate the plume geometry and to empirically constrain input parameters for the two models tested. Two strategies are presented to correct the difference in maximum plume height and centerline height: (a) based on plume radius, and (b) by using the plume type parameter Π, which quantifies the relative influence of buoyancy and cross-wind on the plume dynamics, to discriminate weak, intermediate and strong plumes. The results indicate that it may be more appropriate to classify plumes as either wind-dominated, intermediate or buoyancy-dominated, where the relative effects of both wind and MER define the type. The analysis of the Eyjafjallajökull data shows that the MER estimates from both models are considerably improved when a plume-type dependent centerline-correction is applied. For one model, we varied the wind entrainment coefficient β. For this particular eruption, we find that the best value for β lies between 0.28 and 0.36, unlike previous suggestions that set this parameter to 0.50. Article in Journal/Newspaper Eyjafjallajökull Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 128 2
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language unknown
description The considerable effects that wind can have on estimates of mass eruption rates (MERs) in explosive eruptions based on volcanic plume height are well known but difficult to quantify rigorously. Many explicitly wind-affected plume models have the additional difficulty that they require the use of centerline heights of bent-over plumes, a parameter not easily obtained directly from observational data. We tested two such models by using the time series of varying plume heights and windspeeds of the 2010 eruption. The mapped fallout and photos taken during this eruption allow us to estimate the plume geometry and to empirically constrain input parameters for the two models tested. Two strategies are presented to correct the difference in maximum plume height and centerline height: (a) based on plume radius, and (b) by using the plume type parameter Π, which quantifies the relative influence of buoyancy and cross-wind on the plume dynamics, to discriminate weak, intermediate and strong plumes. The results indicate that it may be more appropriate to classify plumes as either wind-dominated, intermediate or buoyancy-dominated, where the relative effects of both wind and MER define the type. The analysis of the Eyjafjallajökull data shows that the MER estimates from both models are considerably improved when a plume-type dependent centerline-correction is applied. For one model, we varied the wind entrainment coefficient β. For this particular eruption, we find that the best value for β lies between 0.28 and 0.36, unlike previous suggestions that set this parameter to 0.50.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Dürig, Tobias
Gudmundsson, Magnús T.
Dioguardi, Fabio
Schmidt, Louise Steffensen
spellingShingle Dürig, Tobias
Gudmundsson, Magnús T.
Dioguardi, Fabio
Schmidt, Louise Steffensen
Quantifying the effect of wind on volcanic plumes: implications for plume modeling
author_facet Dürig, Tobias
Gudmundsson, Magnús T.
Dioguardi, Fabio
Schmidt, Louise Steffensen
author_sort Dürig, Tobias
title Quantifying the effect of wind on volcanic plumes: implications for plume modeling
title_short Quantifying the effect of wind on volcanic plumes: implications for plume modeling
title_full Quantifying the effect of wind on volcanic plumes: implications for plume modeling
title_fullStr Quantifying the effect of wind on volcanic plumes: implications for plume modeling
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the effect of wind on volcanic plumes: implications for plume modeling
title_sort quantifying the effect of wind on volcanic plumes: implications for plume modeling
publishDate 2023
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/534117/
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037781
genre Eyjafjallajökull
genre_facet Eyjafjallajökull
op_relation Dürig, Tobias; Gudmundsson, Magnús T.; Dioguardi, Fabio; Schmidt, Louise Steffensen. 2023 Quantifying the effect of wind on volcanic plumes: implications for plume modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 128 (2), e2022JD037781. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037781 <https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037781>
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037781
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
container_volume 128
container_issue 2
_version_ 1766405486648754176