What is the surface mass balance of Antarctica? An intercomparison of regional climate model estimates.

We compare the performance of five different regional climate models (RCMs) (COSMO-CLM2, HIRHAM5, MAR3.10, MetUM, and RACMO2.3p2), forced by ERA-Interim reanalysis, in simulating the near-surface climate and surface mass balance (SMB) of Antarctica. All models simulate Antarctic climate well when co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mottram, R., Hansen, N., Kittel, C., Melchior van Wessem, J., Agosta, C., Amory, C., Boberg, F., Jan van de Berg, W., Fettweis, X., Gossart, A., van Lipzig, N.P.M., van Meijgaard, E., Orr, A., Phillips, T., Webster, S., Simonsen, S.B., Souverijns, N.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: European Geosciences Union 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/530982/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/530982/1/tc-15-3751-2021.pdf
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/3751/2021/
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:530982
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:530982 2023-05-15T13:41:46+02:00 What is the surface mass balance of Antarctica? An intercomparison of regional climate model estimates. Mottram, R. Hansen, N. Kittel, C. Melchior van Wessem, J. Agosta, C. Amory, C. Boberg, F. Jan van de Berg, W. Fettweis, X. Gossart, A. van Lipzig, N.P.M. van Meijgaard, E. Orr, A. Phillips, T. Webster, S. Simonsen, S.B. Souverijns, N. 2021-08-17 text http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/530982/ https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/530982/1/tc-15-3751-2021.pdf https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/3751/2021/ en eng European Geosciences Union https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/530982/1/tc-15-3751-2021.pdf Mottram, R.; Hansen, N.; Kittel, C.; Melchior van Wessem, J.; Agosta, C.; Amory, C.; Boberg, F.; Jan van de Berg, W.; Fettweis, X.; Gossart, A.; van Lipzig, N.P.M.; van Meijgaard, E.; Orr, A. orcid:0000-0001-5111-8402 Phillips, T. orcid:0000-0002-3058-9157 Webster, S.; Simonsen, S.B.; Souverijns, N. 2021 What is the surface mass balance of Antarctica? An intercomparison of regional climate model estimates. [in special issue: The Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP6 (ISMIP6)] The Cryosphere, 15 (8). 3751-3784. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3751-2021 <https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3751-2021> cc_by_4 CC-BY Publication - Article PeerReviewed 2021 ftnerc 2023-02-04T19:52:32Z We compare the performance of five different regional climate models (RCMs) (COSMO-CLM2, HIRHAM5, MAR3.10, MetUM, and RACMO2.3p2), forced by ERA-Interim reanalysis, in simulating the near-surface climate and surface mass balance (SMB) of Antarctica. All models simulate Antarctic climate well when compared with daily observed temperature and pressure, with nudged models matching daily observations slightly better than free-running models. The ensemble mean annual SMB over the Antarctic ice sheet (AIS) including ice shelves is 2329±94 Gt yr−1 over the common 1987–2015 period covered by all models. There is large interannual variability, consistent between models due to variability in the driving ERA-Interim reanalysis. Mean annual SMB is sensitive to the chosen period; over our 30-year climatological mean period (1980 to 2010), the ensemble mean is 2483 Gt yr−1. However, individual model estimates vary from 1961±70 to 2519±118 Gt yr−1. The largest spatial differences between model SMB estimates are in West Antarctica, the Antarctic Peninsula, and around the Transantarctic Mountains. We find no significant trend in Antarctic SMB over either period. Antarctic ice sheet (AIS) mass loss is currently equivalent to around 0.5 mm yr−1 of global mean sea level rise (Shepherd et al., 2020), but our results indicate some uncertainty in the SMB contribution based on RCMs. We compare modelled SMB with a large dataset of observations, which, though biased by undersampling, indicates that many of the biases in SMB are common between models. A drifting-snow scheme improves modelled SMB on ice sheet surface slopes with an elevation between 1000 and 2000 m, where strong katabatic winds form. Different ice masks have a substantial impact on the integrated total SMB and along with model resolution are factored into our analysis. Targeting undersampled regions with high precipitation for observational campaigns will be key to improving future estimates of SMB in Antarctica. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica Ice Sheet Ice Shelves The Cryosphere West Antarctica Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula West Antarctica Transantarctic Mountains
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language English
description We compare the performance of five different regional climate models (RCMs) (COSMO-CLM2, HIRHAM5, MAR3.10, MetUM, and RACMO2.3p2), forced by ERA-Interim reanalysis, in simulating the near-surface climate and surface mass balance (SMB) of Antarctica. All models simulate Antarctic climate well when compared with daily observed temperature and pressure, with nudged models matching daily observations slightly better than free-running models. The ensemble mean annual SMB over the Antarctic ice sheet (AIS) including ice shelves is 2329±94 Gt yr−1 over the common 1987–2015 period covered by all models. There is large interannual variability, consistent between models due to variability in the driving ERA-Interim reanalysis. Mean annual SMB is sensitive to the chosen period; over our 30-year climatological mean period (1980 to 2010), the ensemble mean is 2483 Gt yr−1. However, individual model estimates vary from 1961±70 to 2519±118 Gt yr−1. The largest spatial differences between model SMB estimates are in West Antarctica, the Antarctic Peninsula, and around the Transantarctic Mountains. We find no significant trend in Antarctic SMB over either period. Antarctic ice sheet (AIS) mass loss is currently equivalent to around 0.5 mm yr−1 of global mean sea level rise (Shepherd et al., 2020), but our results indicate some uncertainty in the SMB contribution based on RCMs. We compare modelled SMB with a large dataset of observations, which, though biased by undersampling, indicates that many of the biases in SMB are common between models. A drifting-snow scheme improves modelled SMB on ice sheet surface slopes with an elevation between 1000 and 2000 m, where strong katabatic winds form. Different ice masks have a substantial impact on the integrated total SMB and along with model resolution are factored into our analysis. Targeting undersampled regions with high precipitation for observational campaigns will be key to improving future estimates of SMB in Antarctica.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mottram, R.
Hansen, N.
Kittel, C.
Melchior van Wessem, J.
Agosta, C.
Amory, C.
Boberg, F.
Jan van de Berg, W.
Fettweis, X.
Gossart, A.
van Lipzig, N.P.M.
van Meijgaard, E.
Orr, A.
Phillips, T.
Webster, S.
Simonsen, S.B.
Souverijns, N.
spellingShingle Mottram, R.
Hansen, N.
Kittel, C.
Melchior van Wessem, J.
Agosta, C.
Amory, C.
Boberg, F.
Jan van de Berg, W.
Fettweis, X.
Gossart, A.
van Lipzig, N.P.M.
van Meijgaard, E.
Orr, A.
Phillips, T.
Webster, S.
Simonsen, S.B.
Souverijns, N.
What is the surface mass balance of Antarctica? An intercomparison of regional climate model estimates.
author_facet Mottram, R.
Hansen, N.
Kittel, C.
Melchior van Wessem, J.
Agosta, C.
Amory, C.
Boberg, F.
Jan van de Berg, W.
Fettweis, X.
Gossart, A.
van Lipzig, N.P.M.
van Meijgaard, E.
Orr, A.
Phillips, T.
Webster, S.
Simonsen, S.B.
Souverijns, N.
author_sort Mottram, R.
title What is the surface mass balance of Antarctica? An intercomparison of regional climate model estimates.
title_short What is the surface mass balance of Antarctica? An intercomparison of regional climate model estimates.
title_full What is the surface mass balance of Antarctica? An intercomparison of regional climate model estimates.
title_fullStr What is the surface mass balance of Antarctica? An intercomparison of regional climate model estimates.
title_full_unstemmed What is the surface mass balance of Antarctica? An intercomparison of regional climate model estimates.
title_sort what is the surface mass balance of antarctica? an intercomparison of regional climate model estimates.
publisher European Geosciences Union
publishDate 2021
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/530982/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/530982/1/tc-15-3751-2021.pdf
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/3751/2021/
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
West Antarctica
Transantarctic Mountains
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
West Antarctica
Transantarctic Mountains
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctica
Ice Sheet
Ice Shelves
The Cryosphere
West Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctica
Ice Sheet
Ice Shelves
The Cryosphere
West Antarctica
op_relation https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/530982/1/tc-15-3751-2021.pdf
Mottram, R.; Hansen, N.; Kittel, C.; Melchior van Wessem, J.; Agosta, C.; Amory, C.; Boberg, F.; Jan van de Berg, W.; Fettweis, X.; Gossart, A.; van Lipzig, N.P.M.; van Meijgaard, E.; Orr, A. orcid:0000-0001-5111-8402
Phillips, T. orcid:0000-0002-3058-9157
Webster, S.; Simonsen, S.B.; Souverijns, N. 2021 What is the surface mass balance of Antarctica? An intercomparison of regional climate model estimates. [in special issue: The Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP6 (ISMIP6)] The Cryosphere, 15 (8). 3751-3784. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3751-2021 <https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3751-2021>
op_rights cc_by_4
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
_version_ 1766157576693612544