Calibration of a frontal ablation parameterization applied to Greenland's peripheral calving glaciers

Greenland's Peripheral Glaciers (PGs) are glaciers that are weakly or not connected to the Ice Sheet. Many are tidewater, losing mass via frontal ablation. Without comprehensive regional observations or enough individual estimates of frontal ablation, constraining model parameters remains a cha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Recinos Rivas, Beatriz, Maussion, Fabien, Noël, Brice, Möller, Marco, Marzeion, Ben
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/530327/
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-2926
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:530327
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:530327 2023-05-15T16:41:14+02:00 Calibration of a frontal ablation parameterization applied to Greenland's peripheral calving glaciers Recinos Rivas, Beatriz Maussion, Fabien Noël, Brice Möller, Marco Marzeion, Ben 2021-04 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/530327/ https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-2926 unknown Recinos Rivas, Beatriz orcid:0000-0002-0647-8131 Maussion, Fabien; Noël, Brice; Möller, Marco; Marzeion, Ben. 2021 Calibration of a frontal ablation parameterization applied to Greenland's peripheral calving glaciers. In: EGU General Assembly 2021, Online, 19-30 April 2021. Publication - Conference Item NonPeerReviewed 2021 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-2926 2023-02-04T19:52:08Z Greenland's Peripheral Glaciers (PGs) are glaciers that are weakly or not connected to the Ice Sheet. Many are tidewater, losing mass via frontal ablation. Without comprehensive regional observations or enough individual estimates of frontal ablation, constraining model parameters remains a challenging task in this region. We present three independent ways to calibrate the calving parameterization implemented in the Open Global Glacier Model (OGGM) and asses the impact of accounting for frontal ablation on the estimate of ice stored in PGs. We estimate an average regional frontal ablation flux for PGs of 7.94±4.15 Gtyr-1 after calibrating the model with two different satellite velocity products, and of 0.75±0.55 Gt yr-1 if the model is constrained using frontal ablation fluxes derived from independent modelled Surface Mass Balance (SMB) averaged over an equilibrium reference period (1961-1990). This second method is based on the assumption that most PGs during that time have an equilibrium between mass gain via SMB and mass loss via frontal ablation. This assumption can serve as a basis to assess the order of magnitude of dynamic mass loss of glaciers when compared to the SMB imbalance. By comparing the model output after applying both calibration methods, we find that the model is not able to predict individual tidewater glacier dynamics if it relies only on SMB estimates and the assumption of a closed budget to constrain the model. The differences between the results from both calibration methods serve as an indication of how strong the dynamic imbalance might have been for PGs during that reference period. Text Ice Sheet Tidewater Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language unknown
description Greenland's Peripheral Glaciers (PGs) are glaciers that are weakly or not connected to the Ice Sheet. Many are tidewater, losing mass via frontal ablation. Without comprehensive regional observations or enough individual estimates of frontal ablation, constraining model parameters remains a challenging task in this region. We present three independent ways to calibrate the calving parameterization implemented in the Open Global Glacier Model (OGGM) and asses the impact of accounting for frontal ablation on the estimate of ice stored in PGs. We estimate an average regional frontal ablation flux for PGs of 7.94±4.15 Gtyr-1 after calibrating the model with two different satellite velocity products, and of 0.75±0.55 Gt yr-1 if the model is constrained using frontal ablation fluxes derived from independent modelled Surface Mass Balance (SMB) averaged over an equilibrium reference period (1961-1990). This second method is based on the assumption that most PGs during that time have an equilibrium between mass gain via SMB and mass loss via frontal ablation. This assumption can serve as a basis to assess the order of magnitude of dynamic mass loss of glaciers when compared to the SMB imbalance. By comparing the model output after applying both calibration methods, we find that the model is not able to predict individual tidewater glacier dynamics if it relies only on SMB estimates and the assumption of a closed budget to constrain the model. The differences between the results from both calibration methods serve as an indication of how strong the dynamic imbalance might have been for PGs during that reference period.
format Text
author Recinos Rivas, Beatriz
Maussion, Fabien
Noël, Brice
Möller, Marco
Marzeion, Ben
spellingShingle Recinos Rivas, Beatriz
Maussion, Fabien
Noël, Brice
Möller, Marco
Marzeion, Ben
Calibration of a frontal ablation parameterization applied to Greenland's peripheral calving glaciers
author_facet Recinos Rivas, Beatriz
Maussion, Fabien
Noël, Brice
Möller, Marco
Marzeion, Ben
author_sort Recinos Rivas, Beatriz
title Calibration of a frontal ablation parameterization applied to Greenland's peripheral calving glaciers
title_short Calibration of a frontal ablation parameterization applied to Greenland's peripheral calving glaciers
title_full Calibration of a frontal ablation parameterization applied to Greenland's peripheral calving glaciers
title_fullStr Calibration of a frontal ablation parameterization applied to Greenland's peripheral calving glaciers
title_full_unstemmed Calibration of a frontal ablation parameterization applied to Greenland's peripheral calving glaciers
title_sort calibration of a frontal ablation parameterization applied to greenland's peripheral calving glaciers
publishDate 2021
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/530327/
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-2926
genre Ice Sheet
Tidewater
genre_facet Ice Sheet
Tidewater
op_relation Recinos Rivas, Beatriz orcid:0000-0002-0647-8131
Maussion, Fabien; Noël, Brice; Möller, Marco; Marzeion, Ben. 2021 Calibration of a frontal ablation parameterization applied to Greenland's peripheral calving glaciers. In: EGU General Assembly 2021, Online, 19-30 April 2021.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-2926
_version_ 1766031671384080384