Can classic biological invasion hypotheses be applied to reported cases of non-native terrestrial species in the Maritime Antarctic?

Understanding the success factors underlying each step in the process of biological invasion provides a robust foundation upon which to develop appropriate biosecurity measures. Insights into the processes occurring can be gained through clarifying the circumstances applying to non-native species th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pertierra, Luis R., Convey, Peter, Martinez, Pablo Ariel, Tejedo, Pablo, Benayas, Javier, Olalla-Tárraga, Miguel Ángel
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/529621/
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antarctic-science/article/abs/can-classic-biological-invasion-hypotheses-be-applied-to-reported-cases-of-nonnative-terrestrial-species-in-the-maritime-antarctic/AD09C11B1A8C5A0545E9F19703D13E03
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:529621
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:529621 2023-05-15T13:41:45+02:00 Can classic biological invasion hypotheses be applied to reported cases of non-native terrestrial species in the Maritime Antarctic? Pertierra, Luis R. Convey, Peter Martinez, Pablo Ariel Tejedo, Pablo Benayas, Javier Olalla-Tárraga, Miguel Ángel 2022-06 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/529621/ https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antarctic-science/article/abs/can-classic-biological-invasion-hypotheses-be-applied-to-reported-cases-of-nonnative-terrestrial-species-in-the-maritime-antarctic/AD09C11B1A8C5A0545E9F19703D13E03 unknown Cambridge University Press Pertierra, Luis R.; Convey, Peter orcid:0000-0001-8497-9903 Martinez, Pablo Ariel; Tejedo, Pablo; Benayas, Javier; Olalla-Tárraga, Miguel Ángel. 2022 Can classic biological invasion hypotheses be applied to reported cases of non-native terrestrial species in the Maritime Antarctic? Antarctic Science, 34 (3). 226-245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102022000037 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102022000037> Publication - Article PeerReviewed 2022 ftnerc 2023-02-04T19:51:46Z Understanding the success factors underlying each step in the process of biological invasion provides a robust foundation upon which to develop appropriate biosecurity measures. Insights into the processes occurring can be gained through clarifying the circumstances applying to non-native species that have arrived, established and, in some cases, successfully spread in terrestrial Antarctica. To date, examples include a small number of vascular plants and a greater diversity of invertebrates (including Diptera, Collembola, Acari and Oligochaeta), which share features of pre-adaptation to the environmental stresses experienced in Antarctica. In this synthesis, we examine multiple classic invasion science hypotheses that are widely considered to have relevance in invasion ecology and assess their utility in understanding the different invasion histories so far documented in the continent. All of these existing hypotheses appear relevant to some degree in explaining invasion processes in Antarctica. They are also relevant in understanding failed invasions and identifying barriers to invasion. However, the limited number of cases currently available constrains the possibility of establishing patterns and processes. To conclude, we discuss several new and emerging confirmatory methods as relevant tools to test and compare these hypotheses given the availability of appropriate sample sizes in the future. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Antarctica Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language unknown
description Understanding the success factors underlying each step in the process of biological invasion provides a robust foundation upon which to develop appropriate biosecurity measures. Insights into the processes occurring can be gained through clarifying the circumstances applying to non-native species that have arrived, established and, in some cases, successfully spread in terrestrial Antarctica. To date, examples include a small number of vascular plants and a greater diversity of invertebrates (including Diptera, Collembola, Acari and Oligochaeta), which share features of pre-adaptation to the environmental stresses experienced in Antarctica. In this synthesis, we examine multiple classic invasion science hypotheses that are widely considered to have relevance in invasion ecology and assess their utility in understanding the different invasion histories so far documented in the continent. All of these existing hypotheses appear relevant to some degree in explaining invasion processes in Antarctica. They are also relevant in understanding failed invasions and identifying barriers to invasion. However, the limited number of cases currently available constrains the possibility of establishing patterns and processes. To conclude, we discuss several new and emerging confirmatory methods as relevant tools to test and compare these hypotheses given the availability of appropriate sample sizes in the future.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Pertierra, Luis R.
Convey, Peter
Martinez, Pablo Ariel
Tejedo, Pablo
Benayas, Javier
Olalla-Tárraga, Miguel Ángel
spellingShingle Pertierra, Luis R.
Convey, Peter
Martinez, Pablo Ariel
Tejedo, Pablo
Benayas, Javier
Olalla-Tárraga, Miguel Ángel
Can classic biological invasion hypotheses be applied to reported cases of non-native terrestrial species in the Maritime Antarctic?
author_facet Pertierra, Luis R.
Convey, Peter
Martinez, Pablo Ariel
Tejedo, Pablo
Benayas, Javier
Olalla-Tárraga, Miguel Ángel
author_sort Pertierra, Luis R.
title Can classic biological invasion hypotheses be applied to reported cases of non-native terrestrial species in the Maritime Antarctic?
title_short Can classic biological invasion hypotheses be applied to reported cases of non-native terrestrial species in the Maritime Antarctic?
title_full Can classic biological invasion hypotheses be applied to reported cases of non-native terrestrial species in the Maritime Antarctic?
title_fullStr Can classic biological invasion hypotheses be applied to reported cases of non-native terrestrial species in the Maritime Antarctic?
title_full_unstemmed Can classic biological invasion hypotheses be applied to reported cases of non-native terrestrial species in the Maritime Antarctic?
title_sort can classic biological invasion hypotheses be applied to reported cases of non-native terrestrial species in the maritime antarctic?
publisher Cambridge University Press
publishDate 2022
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/529621/
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antarctic-science/article/abs/can-classic-biological-invasion-hypotheses-be-applied-to-reported-cases-of-nonnative-terrestrial-species-in-the-maritime-antarctic/AD09C11B1A8C5A0545E9F19703D13E03
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
op_relation Pertierra, Luis R.; Convey, Peter orcid:0000-0001-8497-9903
Martinez, Pablo Ariel; Tejedo, Pablo; Benayas, Javier; Olalla-Tárraga, Miguel Ángel. 2022 Can classic biological invasion hypotheses be applied to reported cases of non-native terrestrial species in the Maritime Antarctic? Antarctic Science, 34 (3). 226-245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102022000037 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102022000037>
_version_ 1766157273537708032