Atmospheric drivers of melt on Larsen C Ice Shelf: surface energy budget regimes and the impact of foehn

• Published in: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
• Main Authors: Elvidge, Andrew D., Kuipers Munneke, Peter, King, John C., Renfrew, Ian A., Gilbert, Ella
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: American Geophysical Union 2020
• Subjects: Antarctic; The Antarctic; Antarctic Peninsula; Cabinet Inlet; Antarc*; Ice Shelf; Ice Shelves
• Online Access: http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/527839/; https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/527839/1/2020JD032463.pdf; https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2020JD032463

Recent ice shelf retreat on the east coast of the Antarctic Peninsula has been principally attributed to atmospherically driven melt. However, previous studies on the largest of these ice shelves – Larsen C – have struggled to reconcile atmospheric forcing with observed melt. This study provides the first comprehensive quantification and explanation of the atmospheric drivers of melt across Larsen C, using 31‐months’ worth of observations from Cabinet Inlet, a 6‐month, high‐resolution atmospheric model simulation and a novel approach to ascertain the surface energy budget (SEB) regime. The dominant meteorological controls on melt are shown to be the occurrence, strength and warmth of mountain winds called foehn. At Cabinet Inlet, foehn occurs 15 % of the time and causes 45 % of melt. The primary effect of foehn on the SEB is elevated turbulent heat fluxes. Under typical, warm foehn conditions, this means elevated surface heating and melting, the intensity of which increases as foehn wind speed increases. Less commonly – during cooler‐than‐normal foehn windsover radiatively‐warmed ice – the relationship between wind speed and net surface heat flux reverses, which explains the seemingly contradictory results of previous studies. In the model, spatial variability in cumulative melt across Larsen C is largely explained by foehn, with melt maxima in inlets reflecting maxima in foehn wind strength. However, most accumulated melt (58%) occurs due to solar radiation in the absence of foehn. A broad north‐south gradient in melt is explained by the combined influence of foehn and non‐foehn conditions.