Is vertical shear in an ice shelf negligible?

Vertical shear stress in ice shelves cannot be precisely zero, since the upper and lower surfaces are generally not parallel. By performing stress balance on a vertical column in an ice shelf we calculate what its magnitude must be. This is done for an unconfined glacier tongue and for a confined ba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: Sanderson, T.J.O., Doake, C.S.M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: International Glaciological Society 1979
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/525201/
https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000014271
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:525201
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:525201 2023-05-15T13:22:02+02:00 Is vertical shear in an ice shelf negligible? Sanderson, T.J.O. Doake, C.S.M. 1979 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/525201/ https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000014271 unknown International Glaciological Society Sanderson, T.J.O.; Doake, C.S.M. 1979 Is vertical shear in an ice shelf negligible? Journal of Glaciology, 22 (87). 285-292. https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000014271 <https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000014271> Publication - Article PeerReviewed 1979 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000014271 2023-02-04T19:49:18Z Vertical shear stress in ice shelves cannot be precisely zero, since the upper and lower surfaces are generally not parallel. By performing stress balance on a vertical column in an ice shelf we calculate what its magnitude must be. This is done for an unconfined glacier tongue and for a confined bay ice shelf; first, using the assumption of constant temperature and density with depth, and secondly, using realistic data and profiles for Erebus Glacier tongue and for the Amery ice shelf. Shear stresses increase almost linearly with depth and are proportional to surface slope. For Erebus Glacier tongue the shear stress is at most 5% of the magnitude of the direct stress deviators and its action through the ice shell should result in differential movement of 1.8 cm a−1 between the top and bottom of the ice shelf. For the Amery ice shelf, the shear stress is at most 0.4% of the magnitude of the direct stress deviators and this should lead to differential movement of 2.5 cm a−1 between the top and bottom of the ice shelf. Shear stresses are therefore generally negligible in comparison with direct stress deviators and can be ignored when considering the overall dynamics of ice shelves. Differential movement is unlikely to be detectable. Article in Journal/Newspaper Amery Ice Shelf Erebus Glacier Ice Shelf Ice Shelves Journal of Glaciology Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Amery ENVELOPE(-94.063,-94.063,56.565,56.565) Amery Ice Shelf ENVELOPE(71.000,71.000,-69.750,-69.750) Erebus Glacier ENVELOPE(167.000,167.000,-77.683,-77.683) Erebus Glacier Tongue ENVELOPE(166.667,166.667,-77.700,-77.700) Journal of Glaciology 22 87 285 292
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language unknown
description Vertical shear stress in ice shelves cannot be precisely zero, since the upper and lower surfaces are generally not parallel. By performing stress balance on a vertical column in an ice shelf we calculate what its magnitude must be. This is done for an unconfined glacier tongue and for a confined bay ice shelf; first, using the assumption of constant temperature and density with depth, and secondly, using realistic data and profiles for Erebus Glacier tongue and for the Amery ice shelf. Shear stresses increase almost linearly with depth and are proportional to surface slope. For Erebus Glacier tongue the shear stress is at most 5% of the magnitude of the direct stress deviators and its action through the ice shell should result in differential movement of 1.8 cm a−1 between the top and bottom of the ice shelf. For the Amery ice shelf, the shear stress is at most 0.4% of the magnitude of the direct stress deviators and this should lead to differential movement of 2.5 cm a−1 between the top and bottom of the ice shelf. Shear stresses are therefore generally negligible in comparison with direct stress deviators and can be ignored when considering the overall dynamics of ice shelves. Differential movement is unlikely to be detectable.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sanderson, T.J.O.
Doake, C.S.M.
spellingShingle Sanderson, T.J.O.
Doake, C.S.M.
Is vertical shear in an ice shelf negligible?
author_facet Sanderson, T.J.O.
Doake, C.S.M.
author_sort Sanderson, T.J.O.
title Is vertical shear in an ice shelf negligible?
title_short Is vertical shear in an ice shelf negligible?
title_full Is vertical shear in an ice shelf negligible?
title_fullStr Is vertical shear in an ice shelf negligible?
title_full_unstemmed Is vertical shear in an ice shelf negligible?
title_sort is vertical shear in an ice shelf negligible?
publisher International Glaciological Society
publishDate 1979
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/525201/
https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000014271
long_lat ENVELOPE(-94.063,-94.063,56.565,56.565)
ENVELOPE(71.000,71.000,-69.750,-69.750)
ENVELOPE(167.000,167.000,-77.683,-77.683)
ENVELOPE(166.667,166.667,-77.700,-77.700)
geographic Amery
Amery Ice Shelf
Erebus Glacier
Erebus Glacier Tongue
geographic_facet Amery
Amery Ice Shelf
Erebus Glacier
Erebus Glacier Tongue
genre Amery Ice Shelf
Erebus Glacier
Ice Shelf
Ice Shelves
Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet Amery Ice Shelf
Erebus Glacier
Ice Shelf
Ice Shelves
Journal of Glaciology
op_relation Sanderson, T.J.O.; Doake, C.S.M. 1979 Is vertical shear in an ice shelf negligible? Journal of Glaciology, 22 (87). 285-292. https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000014271 <https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000014271>
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000014271
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 22
container_issue 87
container_start_page 285
op_container_end_page 292
_version_ 1766362942220009472