Moho depths of Antarctica: comparison of seismic, gravity, and isostatic results
The lithospheric structure of Antarctica is still under‐explored. Moho depth estimate studies are in disagreement by more than 10 km in several regions, including for example the hinterland of the Transantarctic Mountains. Taking account the sparseness of seismological stations and the non‐uniquenes...
Published in: | Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Geophysical Union
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/522630/ https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/522630/1/Pappa_et_al-2019-Geochemistry,_Geophysics,_Geosystems.pdf https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2018GC008111 |
id |
ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:522630 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:522630 2023-05-15T13:41:43+02:00 Moho depths of Antarctica: comparison of seismic, gravity, and isostatic results Pappa, F. Ebbing, J. Ferraccioli, Fausto 2019-03 text http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/522630/ https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/522630/1/Pappa_et_al-2019-Geochemistry,_Geophysics,_Geosystems.pdf https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2018GC008111 en eng American Geophysical Union https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/522630/1/Pappa_et_al-2019-Geochemistry,_Geophysics,_Geosystems.pdf Pappa, F.; Ebbing, J.; Ferraccioli, Fausto orcid:0000-0002-9347-4736 . 2019 Moho depths of Antarctica: comparison of seismic, gravity, and isostatic results. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 20 (3). 1629-1645. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC008111 <https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC008111> Earth Sciences Publication - Article PeerReviewed 2019 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC008111 2023-02-04T19:47:57Z The lithospheric structure of Antarctica is still under‐explored. Moho depth estimate studies are in disagreement by more than 10 km in several regions, including for example the hinterland of the Transantarctic Mountains. Taking account the sparseness of seismological stations and the non‐uniqueness of potential field methods, inversions of Moho depth are performed here based on satellite gravity data in combination with currently available seismically constrained Moho depth estimates. Our results confirm that a lower density contrast at the Moho is present under East Antarctica than beneath West Antarctica. A comparison between the Moho depth derived from our inversion and an Airy‐isostatic Moho model also reveals a spatially variable buoyancy contribution from the lithospheric mantle beneath contrasting sectors of East Antarctica. Finally, to test the plausibility of different Moho depths scenarios for the Transantarctic Mountains–Wilkes Subglacial Basin system, we present 2‐D lithospheric models along the TAMSEIS/GAMSEIS seismic profile. Our models show that if a moderately depleted lithospheric mantle of inferred Proterozoic age underlies the region, then a shallower Moho is more likely beneath the Wilkes Subglacial Basin. If however, re‐fertilisation processes occurred in the upper mantle, for example in response to Ross‐age subduction, then a deeper Moho scenario is preferred. We conclude that 3D lithospheric modeling, coupled with the availability of new seismic information in the hinterland of the Transantarctic Mountains is required to help resolve this controversy, thereby also reducing the ambiguities in geothermal heat flux estimation beneath this key part of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica East Antarctica Ice Sheet West Antarctica Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Antarctic East Antarctica West Antarctica East Antarctic Ice Sheet Transantarctic Mountains Wilkes Subglacial Basin ENVELOPE(145.000,145.000,-75.000,-75.000) Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 20 3 1629 1645 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive |
op_collection_id |
ftnerc |
language |
English |
topic |
Earth Sciences |
spellingShingle |
Earth Sciences Pappa, F. Ebbing, J. Ferraccioli, Fausto Moho depths of Antarctica: comparison of seismic, gravity, and isostatic results |
topic_facet |
Earth Sciences |
description |
The lithospheric structure of Antarctica is still under‐explored. Moho depth estimate studies are in disagreement by more than 10 km in several regions, including for example the hinterland of the Transantarctic Mountains. Taking account the sparseness of seismological stations and the non‐uniqueness of potential field methods, inversions of Moho depth are performed here based on satellite gravity data in combination with currently available seismically constrained Moho depth estimates. Our results confirm that a lower density contrast at the Moho is present under East Antarctica than beneath West Antarctica. A comparison between the Moho depth derived from our inversion and an Airy‐isostatic Moho model also reveals a spatially variable buoyancy contribution from the lithospheric mantle beneath contrasting sectors of East Antarctica. Finally, to test the plausibility of different Moho depths scenarios for the Transantarctic Mountains–Wilkes Subglacial Basin system, we present 2‐D lithospheric models along the TAMSEIS/GAMSEIS seismic profile. Our models show that if a moderately depleted lithospheric mantle of inferred Proterozoic age underlies the region, then a shallower Moho is more likely beneath the Wilkes Subglacial Basin. If however, re‐fertilisation processes occurred in the upper mantle, for example in response to Ross‐age subduction, then a deeper Moho scenario is preferred. We conclude that 3D lithospheric modeling, coupled with the availability of new seismic information in the hinterland of the Transantarctic Mountains is required to help resolve this controversy, thereby also reducing the ambiguities in geothermal heat flux estimation beneath this key part of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Pappa, F. Ebbing, J. Ferraccioli, Fausto |
author_facet |
Pappa, F. Ebbing, J. Ferraccioli, Fausto |
author_sort |
Pappa, F. |
title |
Moho depths of Antarctica: comparison of seismic, gravity, and isostatic results |
title_short |
Moho depths of Antarctica: comparison of seismic, gravity, and isostatic results |
title_full |
Moho depths of Antarctica: comparison of seismic, gravity, and isostatic results |
title_fullStr |
Moho depths of Antarctica: comparison of seismic, gravity, and isostatic results |
title_full_unstemmed |
Moho depths of Antarctica: comparison of seismic, gravity, and isostatic results |
title_sort |
moho depths of antarctica: comparison of seismic, gravity, and isostatic results |
publisher |
American Geophysical Union |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/522630/ https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/522630/1/Pappa_et_al-2019-Geochemistry,_Geophysics,_Geosystems.pdf https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2018GC008111 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(145.000,145.000,-75.000,-75.000) |
geographic |
Antarctic East Antarctica West Antarctica East Antarctic Ice Sheet Transantarctic Mountains Wilkes Subglacial Basin |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic East Antarctica West Antarctica East Antarctic Ice Sheet Transantarctic Mountains Wilkes Subglacial Basin |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica East Antarctica Ice Sheet West Antarctica |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica East Antarctica Ice Sheet West Antarctica |
op_relation |
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/522630/1/Pappa_et_al-2019-Geochemistry,_Geophysics,_Geosystems.pdf Pappa, F.; Ebbing, J.; Ferraccioli, Fausto orcid:0000-0002-9347-4736 . 2019 Moho depths of Antarctica: comparison of seismic, gravity, and isostatic results. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 20 (3). 1629-1645. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC008111 <https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC008111> |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC008111 |
container_title |
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems |
container_volume |
20 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
1629 |
op_container_end_page |
1645 |
_version_ |
1766154433995997184 |