Current logistical capacity is sufficient to deliver the implementation and management of a representative Antarctic protected area system

Antarctica’s terrestrial ecosystems are vulnerable to impacts resulting from climate change and local human activities. The Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) provides for the designation of protected areas through the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. Unsystematic use of agre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Research
Main Authors: Hughes, Kevin, Grant, Susie
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/521857/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/521857/1/Current%20logistical%20capacity%20is%20sufficient%20to%20deliver%20the%20implementation%20and%20management%20of%20a%20representative%20Antarctic%20protected%20area%20system.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2018.1521686
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:521857
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:521857 2023-05-15T13:41:42+02:00 Current logistical capacity is sufficient to deliver the implementation and management of a representative Antarctic protected area system Hughes, Kevin Grant, Susie 2018-12-05 text http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/521857/ https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/521857/1/Current%20logistical%20capacity%20is%20sufficient%20to%20deliver%20the%20implementation%20and%20management%20of%20a%20representative%20Antarctic%20protected%20area%20system.pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2018.1521686 en eng https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/521857/1/Current%20logistical%20capacity%20is%20sufficient%20to%20deliver%20the%20implementation%20and%20management%20of%20a%20representative%20Antarctic%20protected%20area%20system.pdf Hughes, Kevin orcid:0000-0003-2701-726X Grant, Susie. 2018 Current logistical capacity is sufficient to deliver the implementation and management of a representative Antarctic protected area system. Polar Research, 37 (1521686). https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2018.1521686 <https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2018.1521686> Publication - Article PeerReviewed 2018 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2018.1521686 2023-02-04T19:47:35Z Antarctica’s terrestrial ecosystems are vulnerable to impacts resulting from climate change and local human activities. The Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) provides for the designation of protected areas through the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. Unsystematic use of agreed management tools, including Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs), has resulted in a protected area system lacking representation across the full range of Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems and Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Regions (ACBRs). Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP) methods provide established mechanisms to fulfil ATS protected area designation goals. However, how would a continent-wide ASPA system be delivered should appropriate sites be identified using SCP or other methods? Although the rate of area protection has slowed recently, we show that newer Consultative Parties to the Antarctic Treaty are increasingly active as ASPA proponents and may have scope for further engagement with protected area management activities. Furthermore, all 16 ACBRs were found to be within the operational footprint of at least two Parties, indicating that this current logistical footprint could support the implementation and management of a continent-wide ASPA system. Effective management of a representative Antarctic protected areas system could be delivered through greater participation by those Parties with currently more limited protected area management esponsibilities and greater use of remote-sensing technologies for protected area monitoring, where appropriate. Crucially, political will to implement an ASPA system identified through SCP approaches may be greater once a pragmatic means of delivery and effective management has been identified. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Polar Research Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Antarctic The Antarctic Polar Research 37 1 1521686
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language English
description Antarctica’s terrestrial ecosystems are vulnerable to impacts resulting from climate change and local human activities. The Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) provides for the designation of protected areas through the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. Unsystematic use of agreed management tools, including Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs), has resulted in a protected area system lacking representation across the full range of Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems and Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Regions (ACBRs). Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP) methods provide established mechanisms to fulfil ATS protected area designation goals. However, how would a continent-wide ASPA system be delivered should appropriate sites be identified using SCP or other methods? Although the rate of area protection has slowed recently, we show that newer Consultative Parties to the Antarctic Treaty are increasingly active as ASPA proponents and may have scope for further engagement with protected area management activities. Furthermore, all 16 ACBRs were found to be within the operational footprint of at least two Parties, indicating that this current logistical footprint could support the implementation and management of a continent-wide ASPA system. Effective management of a representative Antarctic protected areas system could be delivered through greater participation by those Parties with currently more limited protected area management esponsibilities and greater use of remote-sensing technologies for protected area monitoring, where appropriate. Crucially, political will to implement an ASPA system identified through SCP approaches may be greater once a pragmatic means of delivery and effective management has been identified.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hughes, Kevin
Grant, Susie
spellingShingle Hughes, Kevin
Grant, Susie
Current logistical capacity is sufficient to deliver the implementation and management of a representative Antarctic protected area system
author_facet Hughes, Kevin
Grant, Susie
author_sort Hughes, Kevin
title Current logistical capacity is sufficient to deliver the implementation and management of a representative Antarctic protected area system
title_short Current logistical capacity is sufficient to deliver the implementation and management of a representative Antarctic protected area system
title_full Current logistical capacity is sufficient to deliver the implementation and management of a representative Antarctic protected area system
title_fullStr Current logistical capacity is sufficient to deliver the implementation and management of a representative Antarctic protected area system
title_full_unstemmed Current logistical capacity is sufficient to deliver the implementation and management of a representative Antarctic protected area system
title_sort current logistical capacity is sufficient to deliver the implementation and management of a representative antarctic protected area system
publishDate 2018
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/521857/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/521857/1/Current%20logistical%20capacity%20is%20sufficient%20to%20deliver%20the%20implementation%20and%20management%20of%20a%20representative%20Antarctic%20protected%20area%20system.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2018.1521686
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Polar Research
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Polar Research
op_relation https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/521857/1/Current%20logistical%20capacity%20is%20sufficient%20to%20deliver%20the%20implementation%20and%20management%20of%20a%20representative%20Antarctic%20protected%20area%20system.pdf
Hughes, Kevin orcid:0000-0003-2701-726X
Grant, Susie. 2018 Current logistical capacity is sufficient to deliver the implementation and management of a representative Antarctic protected area system. Polar Research, 37 (1521686). https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2018.1521686 <https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2018.1521686>
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2018.1521686
container_title Polar Research
container_volume 37
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1521686
_version_ 1766154252527337472