Electric fields at L = 2.5 during geomagnetically disturbed conditions

We have used observations of the group time delay and Doppler shift of ducted VLF whistler mode signals propagating near L = 2.5 to deduce the azimuthal component of the plasmaspheric electric field during geomagnetically disturbed periods in June and July 1986. The whistler mode signals originated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Planetary and Space Science
Main Authors: Saxton, J.M., Smith, A.J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Elsevier 1991
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/520170/
https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(91)90046-D
_version_ 1829943088241442816
author Saxton, J.M.
Smith, A.J.
author_facet Saxton, J.M.
Smith, A.J.
author_sort Saxton, J.M.
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1305
container_title Planetary and Space Science
container_volume 39
description We have used observations of the group time delay and Doppler shift of ducted VLF whistler mode signals propagating near L = 2.5 to deduce the azimuthal component of the plasmaspheric electric field during geomagnetically disturbed periods in June and July 1986. The whistler mode signals originated in the US Navy transmitters NAA and NSS and were recorded at Faraday, Antarctica. The average Ewversus LT curve for periods when Kp > 2+ has been compiled; when this is compared with the Ewversus LT curve for quiet times, it is found that the electric field is more eastwards from 18–22 LT and more westwards from 00–01 LT in disturbed times. This difference is consistent with published calculations of the penetration of the dawn-dusk electric field to L = 2.5. A variety of behaviour is evident when the data are examined on a case to case basis. Sometimes the dawn-dusk electric field becomes apparent during isolated intense substorms; this is attributed to increased penetration due to an increase in the auroral zone Pedersen conductivity. On one night the drifts seemed to be partly due to the ionospheric disturbance dynamo.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
geographic Faraday
Pedersen
geographic_facet Faraday
Pedersen
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:520170
institution Open Polar
language unknown
long_lat ENVELOPE(-64.256,-64.256,-65.246,-65.246)
ENVELOPE(140.013,140.013,-66.668,-66.668)
op_collection_id ftnerc
op_container_end_page 1320
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(91)90046-D
op_relation Saxton, J.M.; Smith, A.J. 1991 Electric fields at L = 2.5 during geomagnetically disturbed conditions. Planetary and Space Science, 39 (9). 1305-1320. 10.1016/0032-0633(91)90046-D <https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633%2891%2990046-D>
publishDate 1991
publisher Elsevier
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:520170 2025-04-20T14:25:29+00:00 Electric fields at L = 2.5 during geomagnetically disturbed conditions Saxton, J.M. Smith, A.J. 1991-09 https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/520170/ https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(91)90046-D unknown Elsevier Saxton, J.M.; Smith, A.J. 1991 Electric fields at L = 2.5 during geomagnetically disturbed conditions. Planetary and Space Science, 39 (9). 1305-1320. 10.1016/0032-0633(91)90046-D <https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633%2891%2990046-D> Publication - Article PeerReviewed 1991 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(91)90046-D 2025-04-09T03:58:26Z We have used observations of the group time delay and Doppler shift of ducted VLF whistler mode signals propagating near L = 2.5 to deduce the azimuthal component of the plasmaspheric electric field during geomagnetically disturbed periods in June and July 1986. The whistler mode signals originated in the US Navy transmitters NAA and NSS and were recorded at Faraday, Antarctica. The average Ewversus LT curve for periods when Kp > 2+ has been compiled; when this is compared with the Ewversus LT curve for quiet times, it is found that the electric field is more eastwards from 18–22 LT and more westwards from 00–01 LT in disturbed times. This difference is consistent with published calculations of the penetration of the dawn-dusk electric field to L = 2.5. A variety of behaviour is evident when the data are examined on a case to case basis. Sometimes the dawn-dusk electric field becomes apparent during isolated intense substorms; this is attributed to increased penetration due to an increase in the auroral zone Pedersen conductivity. On one night the drifts seemed to be partly due to the ionospheric disturbance dynamo. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Faraday ENVELOPE(-64.256,-64.256,-65.246,-65.246) Pedersen ENVELOPE(140.013,140.013,-66.668,-66.668) Planetary and Space Science 39 9 1305 1320
spellingShingle Saxton, J.M.
Smith, A.J.
Electric fields at L = 2.5 during geomagnetically disturbed conditions
title Electric fields at L = 2.5 during geomagnetically disturbed conditions
title_full Electric fields at L = 2.5 during geomagnetically disturbed conditions
title_fullStr Electric fields at L = 2.5 during geomagnetically disturbed conditions
title_full_unstemmed Electric fields at L = 2.5 during geomagnetically disturbed conditions
title_short Electric fields at L = 2.5 during geomagnetically disturbed conditions
title_sort electric fields at l = 2.5 during geomagnetically disturbed conditions
url https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/520170/
https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(91)90046-D