Joint-bounded crescentic scars formed by subglacial clast-bed contact forces: implications for bedrock failure beneath glaciers

Glaciers and ice sheets are important agents of bedrock erosion, yet the precise processes of bedrock failure beneath glacier ice are incompletely known. Subglacially formed erosional crescentic markings (crescentic gouges, lunate fractures) on bedrock surfaces occur locally in glaciated areas and c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geomorphology
Main Authors: Krabbendam, M., Bradwell, T., Everest, J.D., Eyles, N.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/517113/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/517113/1/Crescentic_Scars_IV_NORA_withFigs_tables.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.021
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:517113
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:517113 2023-05-15T16:21:47+02:00 Joint-bounded crescentic scars formed by subglacial clast-bed contact forces: implications for bedrock failure beneath glaciers Krabbendam, M. Bradwell, T. Everest, J.D. Eyles, N. 2017 text http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/517113/ https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/517113/1/Crescentic_Scars_IV_NORA_withFigs_tables.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.021 en eng Elsevier https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/517113/1/Crescentic_Scars_IV_NORA_withFigs_tables.pdf Krabbendam, M.; Bradwell, T.; Everest, J.D.; Eyles, N. 2017 Joint-bounded crescentic scars formed by subglacial clast-bed contact forces: implications for bedrock failure beneath glaciers. Geomorphology, 290. 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.021 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.021> Publication - Article PeerReviewed 2017 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.021 2023-02-04T19:44:58Z Glaciers and ice sheets are important agents of bedrock erosion, yet the precise processes of bedrock failure beneath glacier ice are incompletely known. Subglacially formed erosional crescentic markings (crescentic gouges, lunate fractures) on bedrock surfaces occur locally in glaciated areas and comprise a conchoidal fracture dipping down-ice and a steep fracture that faces up-ice. Here we report morphologically distinct crescentic scars that are closely associated with preexisting joints, termed here joint-bounded crescentic scars. These hitherto unreported features are ca. 50–200 mm deep and involve considerably more rock removal than previously described crescentic markings. The joint-bounded crescentic scars were found on abraded rhyolite surfaces recently exposed (< 20 years) beneath a retreating glacier in Iceland, as well as on glacially sculpted Precambrian gneisses in NW Scotland and various Precambrian rocks in Ontario, glaciated during the Late Pleistocene. We suggest a common formation mechanism for these contemporary and relict features, whereby a boulder embedded in basal ice produces a continuously migrating clast-bed contact force as it is dragged over the hard (bedrock) bed. As the ice-embedded boulder approaches a preexisting joint in the bedrock, stress concentrations build up in the bed that exceed the intact rock strength, resulting in conchoidal fracturing and detachment of a crescentic wedge-shaped rock fragment. Subsequent removal of the rock fragment probably involves further fracturing or crushing (comminution) under high contact forces. Formation of joint-bounded crescentic scars is favoured by large boulders at the base of the ice, high basal melting rates, and the presence of preexisting subvertical joints in the bedrock bed. We infer that the relative scarcity of crescentic markings in general on deglaciated surfaces shows that fracturing of intact bedrock below ice is difficult, but that preexisting weaknesses such as joints greatly facilitate rock failure. This implies that ... Article in Journal/Newspaper glacier Iceland Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Geomorphology 290 114 127
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language English
description Glaciers and ice sheets are important agents of bedrock erosion, yet the precise processes of bedrock failure beneath glacier ice are incompletely known. Subglacially formed erosional crescentic markings (crescentic gouges, lunate fractures) on bedrock surfaces occur locally in glaciated areas and comprise a conchoidal fracture dipping down-ice and a steep fracture that faces up-ice. Here we report morphologically distinct crescentic scars that are closely associated with preexisting joints, termed here joint-bounded crescentic scars. These hitherto unreported features are ca. 50–200 mm deep and involve considerably more rock removal than previously described crescentic markings. The joint-bounded crescentic scars were found on abraded rhyolite surfaces recently exposed (< 20 years) beneath a retreating glacier in Iceland, as well as on glacially sculpted Precambrian gneisses in NW Scotland and various Precambrian rocks in Ontario, glaciated during the Late Pleistocene. We suggest a common formation mechanism for these contemporary and relict features, whereby a boulder embedded in basal ice produces a continuously migrating clast-bed contact force as it is dragged over the hard (bedrock) bed. As the ice-embedded boulder approaches a preexisting joint in the bedrock, stress concentrations build up in the bed that exceed the intact rock strength, resulting in conchoidal fracturing and detachment of a crescentic wedge-shaped rock fragment. Subsequent removal of the rock fragment probably involves further fracturing or crushing (comminution) under high contact forces. Formation of joint-bounded crescentic scars is favoured by large boulders at the base of the ice, high basal melting rates, and the presence of preexisting subvertical joints in the bedrock bed. We infer that the relative scarcity of crescentic markings in general on deglaciated surfaces shows that fracturing of intact bedrock below ice is difficult, but that preexisting weaknesses such as joints greatly facilitate rock failure. This implies that ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Krabbendam, M.
Bradwell, T.
Everest, J.D.
Eyles, N.
spellingShingle Krabbendam, M.
Bradwell, T.
Everest, J.D.
Eyles, N.
Joint-bounded crescentic scars formed by subglacial clast-bed contact forces: implications for bedrock failure beneath glaciers
author_facet Krabbendam, M.
Bradwell, T.
Everest, J.D.
Eyles, N.
author_sort Krabbendam, M.
title Joint-bounded crescentic scars formed by subglacial clast-bed contact forces: implications for bedrock failure beneath glaciers
title_short Joint-bounded crescentic scars formed by subglacial clast-bed contact forces: implications for bedrock failure beneath glaciers
title_full Joint-bounded crescentic scars formed by subglacial clast-bed contact forces: implications for bedrock failure beneath glaciers
title_fullStr Joint-bounded crescentic scars formed by subglacial clast-bed contact forces: implications for bedrock failure beneath glaciers
title_full_unstemmed Joint-bounded crescentic scars formed by subglacial clast-bed contact forces: implications for bedrock failure beneath glaciers
title_sort joint-bounded crescentic scars formed by subglacial clast-bed contact forces: implications for bedrock failure beneath glaciers
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2017
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/517113/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/517113/1/Crescentic_Scars_IV_NORA_withFigs_tables.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.021
genre glacier
Iceland
genre_facet glacier
Iceland
op_relation https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/517113/1/Crescentic_Scars_IV_NORA_withFigs_tables.pdf
Krabbendam, M.; Bradwell, T.; Everest, J.D.; Eyles, N. 2017 Joint-bounded crescentic scars formed by subglacial clast-bed contact forces: implications for bedrock failure beneath glaciers. Geomorphology, 290. 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.021 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.021>
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.021
container_title Geomorphology
container_volume 290
container_start_page 114
op_container_end_page 127
_version_ 1766009770458742784