Fish in the diet of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) at South Georgia during winter and spring

The occurrence of fish in the diet of the Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella) at Bird Island, South Georgia was investigated by analysis of fish otoliths in scats (faeces) collected during late May to early November 1983. Of the 55 scats examined, 49 contained fish remains, and 45 contained f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Author: North, A.W.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Cambridge University Press 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/515215/
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102096000223
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:515215
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:515215 2023-05-15T13:49:33+02:00 Fish in the diet of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) at South Georgia during winter and spring North, A.W. 1996-06 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/515215/ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102096000223 unknown Cambridge University Press North, A.W. 1996 Fish in the diet of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) at South Georgia during winter and spring. Antarctic Science, 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102096000223 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102096000223> Publication - Article PeerReviewed 1996 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102096000223 2023-02-04T19:43:55Z The occurrence of fish in the diet of the Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella) at Bird Island, South Georgia was investigated by analysis of fish otoliths in scats (faeces) collected during late May to early November 1983. Of the 55 scats examined, 49 contained fish remains, and 45 contained fish otoliths. Ten fish species were represented by 415 otoliths, and 33 otoliths were too digested to be identified unequivocally. Fish size was estimated from otolith size based on published allometric equations. Four coastal notothenioid fishes dominated the fish component of the diet: Champsocephalus gunnari and Gobionotothen gibberifrons each comprised about 40% of the total fish mass; Chaenocephalus aceratus was ranked third by mass and the smaller Lepidonotothen larseni occurred in one quarter of the scats but was of lower importance in terms of mass. The length-frequency distribution of C. gunnari landed by the commercial fishery in October 1982 to June 1983 is similar to that which comprised the bulk of the diet in the present study. Compared with recent studies on the fish component of the diet in the literature, the dominance of C. gunnari is generally similar, however, there was a greater proportion of G. gibberifrons during the 1983 winter and spring than reported for recent winters. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Fur Seal Antarctic Fur Seals Antarctic Science Arctocephalus gazella Bird Island Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Antarctic The Antarctic Bird Island ENVELOPE(-38.060,-38.060,-54.004,-54.004) Antarctic Science 8 2 155 160
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language unknown
description The occurrence of fish in the diet of the Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella) at Bird Island, South Georgia was investigated by analysis of fish otoliths in scats (faeces) collected during late May to early November 1983. Of the 55 scats examined, 49 contained fish remains, and 45 contained fish otoliths. Ten fish species were represented by 415 otoliths, and 33 otoliths were too digested to be identified unequivocally. Fish size was estimated from otolith size based on published allometric equations. Four coastal notothenioid fishes dominated the fish component of the diet: Champsocephalus gunnari and Gobionotothen gibberifrons each comprised about 40% of the total fish mass; Chaenocephalus aceratus was ranked third by mass and the smaller Lepidonotothen larseni occurred in one quarter of the scats but was of lower importance in terms of mass. The length-frequency distribution of C. gunnari landed by the commercial fishery in October 1982 to June 1983 is similar to that which comprised the bulk of the diet in the present study. Compared with recent studies on the fish component of the diet in the literature, the dominance of C. gunnari is generally similar, however, there was a greater proportion of G. gibberifrons during the 1983 winter and spring than reported for recent winters.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author North, A.W.
spellingShingle North, A.W.
Fish in the diet of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) at South Georgia during winter and spring
author_facet North, A.W.
author_sort North, A.W.
title Fish in the diet of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) at South Georgia during winter and spring
title_short Fish in the diet of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) at South Georgia during winter and spring
title_full Fish in the diet of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) at South Georgia during winter and spring
title_fullStr Fish in the diet of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) at South Georgia during winter and spring
title_full_unstemmed Fish in the diet of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) at South Georgia during winter and spring
title_sort fish in the diet of antarctic fur seals (arctocephalus gazella) at south georgia during winter and spring
publisher Cambridge University Press
publishDate 1996
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/515215/
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102096000223
long_lat ENVELOPE(-38.060,-38.060,-54.004,-54.004)
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
Bird Island
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
Bird Island
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Fur Seal
Antarctic Fur Seals
Antarctic Science
Arctocephalus gazella
Bird Island
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Fur Seal
Antarctic Fur Seals
Antarctic Science
Arctocephalus gazella
Bird Island
op_relation North, A.W. 1996 Fish in the diet of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) at South Georgia during winter and spring. Antarctic Science, 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102096000223 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102096000223>
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102096000223
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 8
container_issue 2
container_start_page 155
op_container_end_page 160
_version_ 1766251593405038592