Variations in the altitude of the F2 peak associated with trough-formation processes

A novel approach is described which can help to determine, from ground-based data, which of the possible production mechanisms for the mid-latitude F-region ionospheric trough is dominant during a particular event. This approach involves numerically modelling the possible causal mechanisms of the mi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annales Geophysicae
Main Authors: Crickmore, R. I., Jenkins, B., Bailey, G. J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Springer 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/515010/
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-0628-z
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:515010
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:515010 2023-05-15T13:49:33+02:00 Variations in the altitude of the F2 peak associated with trough-formation processes Crickmore, R. I. Jenkins, B. Bailey, G. J. 1996-06 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/515010/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-0628-z unknown Springer Crickmore, R. I.; Jenkins, B.; Bailey, G. J. 1996 Variations in the altitude of the F2 peak associated with trough-formation processes. Annales Geophysicae, 14 (6). 628-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-0628-z <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-0628-z> Publication - Article PeerReviewed 1996 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-0628-z 2023-02-04T19:43:48Z A novel approach is described which can help to determine, from ground-based data, which of the possible production mechanisms for the mid-latitude F-region ionospheric trough is dominant during a particular event. This approach involves numerically modelling the possible causal mechanisms of the mid-latitude trough to see how each will affect the altitude of the F2-layer electron-concentration peak (hmF2), and then comparing these predictions with the observed variation of hmF2 during trough formation. The modelling work predicts that, if the neutral-wind velocity does not vary, hmF2 will remain almost constant if the trough is formed via stagnation, but will rise if it is formed as a result of high ion velocities or neutral upwelling. Observations made at Halley (76°S, 27°W, L=4.2), Antarctica, show that most frequently the only changes in hmF2 during trough formation are those expected due to variations in the neutral wind, which suggests that stagnation is the most common production mechanism. During the most geomagnetically active night studied, on which Ap varied between 18 and 32, there was a rise in hmF2 that cannot be explained by changes in the neutral wind. On this night the plasma also decayed faster, and the poleward edge of the trough was seen earlier than on other nights. These differences, together with the fact that the ion velocities remained relatively low, suggest the trough was caused by a change in neutral composition, possibly advected into the observing area. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Annales Geophysicae 14 6 628 636
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language unknown
description A novel approach is described which can help to determine, from ground-based data, which of the possible production mechanisms for the mid-latitude F-region ionospheric trough is dominant during a particular event. This approach involves numerically modelling the possible causal mechanisms of the mid-latitude trough to see how each will affect the altitude of the F2-layer electron-concentration peak (hmF2), and then comparing these predictions with the observed variation of hmF2 during trough formation. The modelling work predicts that, if the neutral-wind velocity does not vary, hmF2 will remain almost constant if the trough is formed via stagnation, but will rise if it is formed as a result of high ion velocities or neutral upwelling. Observations made at Halley (76°S, 27°W, L=4.2), Antarctica, show that most frequently the only changes in hmF2 during trough formation are those expected due to variations in the neutral wind, which suggests that stagnation is the most common production mechanism. During the most geomagnetically active night studied, on which Ap varied between 18 and 32, there was a rise in hmF2 that cannot be explained by changes in the neutral wind. On this night the plasma also decayed faster, and the poleward edge of the trough was seen earlier than on other nights. These differences, together with the fact that the ion velocities remained relatively low, suggest the trough was caused by a change in neutral composition, possibly advected into the observing area.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Crickmore, R. I.
Jenkins, B.
Bailey, G. J.
spellingShingle Crickmore, R. I.
Jenkins, B.
Bailey, G. J.
Variations in the altitude of the F2 peak associated with trough-formation processes
author_facet Crickmore, R. I.
Jenkins, B.
Bailey, G. J.
author_sort Crickmore, R. I.
title Variations in the altitude of the F2 peak associated with trough-formation processes
title_short Variations in the altitude of the F2 peak associated with trough-formation processes
title_full Variations in the altitude of the F2 peak associated with trough-formation processes
title_fullStr Variations in the altitude of the F2 peak associated with trough-formation processes
title_full_unstemmed Variations in the altitude of the F2 peak associated with trough-formation processes
title_sort variations in the altitude of the f2 peak associated with trough-formation processes
publisher Springer
publishDate 1996
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/515010/
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-0628-z
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_relation Crickmore, R. I.; Jenkins, B.; Bailey, G. J. 1996 Variations in the altitude of the F2 peak associated with trough-formation processes. Annales Geophysicae, 14 (6). 628-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-0628-z <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-0628-z>
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-0628-z
container_title Annales Geophysicae
container_volume 14
container_issue 6
container_start_page 628
op_container_end_page 636
_version_ 1766251582233509888