Effects of short-term dehydration and rehydration on photosynthesis and respiration by Antarctic bryophytes

The hypothesis that rates of carbon exchange and recovery following dehydration by Antarctic bryophytes are related to habitat water availability was investigated. Carbon fixation was measured using an infra-red gas analysis system. As the water content of the bryophytes was reduced, respiration rat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental and Experimental Botany
Main Author: Davey, Martin C.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Elsevier 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/514454/
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(96)01052-0
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:514454
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:514454 2023-05-15T13:49:33+02:00 Effects of short-term dehydration and rehydration on photosynthesis and respiration by Antarctic bryophytes Davey, Martin C. 1997-06 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/514454/ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(96)01052-0 unknown Elsevier Davey, Martin C. 1997 Effects of short-term dehydration and rehydration on photosynthesis and respiration by Antarctic bryophytes. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 37 (2-3). 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(96)01052-0 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(96)01052-0> Publication - Article PeerReviewed 1997 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(96)01052-0 2023-02-04T19:43:29Z The hypothesis that rates of carbon exchange and recovery following dehydration by Antarctic bryophytes are related to habitat water availability was investigated. Carbon fixation was measured using an infra-red gas analysis system. As the water content of the bryophytes was reduced, respiration rates fell less quickly than those for gross photosynthesis. As a result, net photosynthesis moved from positive to negative, before tending to zero. Xeric species maintained a greater percentage of their photosynthetic capacity at reduced water contents than hydric species, although this trend was not reflected in terms of absolute carbon fixation. Comparison of the experimental observations with measurements of field water contents suggested that water contents of hydric and mesic species remained above those required to maintain maximal rates of photosynthesis through most of the growing season, whereas photosynthesis by xeric species was often water-limited. Recovery following rehydration demonstrated the typical bryophyte resaturation respiration burst and slower recovery of photosynthesis. Times taken to reach the compensation point were generally longer than those reported for non-polar species. Recovery was faster in xeric than in hydric species, although there was no correlation with the final degree of recovery. The results partially support the hypothesis tested, and provide a basis for the inclusion of water content and desiccation events in models of Antarctic bryophyte productivity. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Antarctic Environmental and Experimental Botany 37 2-3 187 198
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language unknown
description The hypothesis that rates of carbon exchange and recovery following dehydration by Antarctic bryophytes are related to habitat water availability was investigated. Carbon fixation was measured using an infra-red gas analysis system. As the water content of the bryophytes was reduced, respiration rates fell less quickly than those for gross photosynthesis. As a result, net photosynthesis moved from positive to negative, before tending to zero. Xeric species maintained a greater percentage of their photosynthetic capacity at reduced water contents than hydric species, although this trend was not reflected in terms of absolute carbon fixation. Comparison of the experimental observations with measurements of field water contents suggested that water contents of hydric and mesic species remained above those required to maintain maximal rates of photosynthesis through most of the growing season, whereas photosynthesis by xeric species was often water-limited. Recovery following rehydration demonstrated the typical bryophyte resaturation respiration burst and slower recovery of photosynthesis. Times taken to reach the compensation point were generally longer than those reported for non-polar species. Recovery was faster in xeric than in hydric species, although there was no correlation with the final degree of recovery. The results partially support the hypothesis tested, and provide a basis for the inclusion of water content and desiccation events in models of Antarctic bryophyte productivity.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Davey, Martin C.
spellingShingle Davey, Martin C.
Effects of short-term dehydration and rehydration on photosynthesis and respiration by Antarctic bryophytes
author_facet Davey, Martin C.
author_sort Davey, Martin C.
title Effects of short-term dehydration and rehydration on photosynthesis and respiration by Antarctic bryophytes
title_short Effects of short-term dehydration and rehydration on photosynthesis and respiration by Antarctic bryophytes
title_full Effects of short-term dehydration and rehydration on photosynthesis and respiration by Antarctic bryophytes
title_fullStr Effects of short-term dehydration and rehydration on photosynthesis and respiration by Antarctic bryophytes
title_full_unstemmed Effects of short-term dehydration and rehydration on photosynthesis and respiration by Antarctic bryophytes
title_sort effects of short-term dehydration and rehydration on photosynthesis and respiration by antarctic bryophytes
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 1997
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/514454/
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(96)01052-0
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_relation Davey, Martin C. 1997 Effects of short-term dehydration and rehydration on photosynthesis and respiration by Antarctic bryophytes. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 37 (2-3). 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(96)01052-0 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(96)01052-0>
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(96)01052-0
container_title Environmental and Experimental Botany
container_volume 37
container_issue 2-3
container_start_page 187
op_container_end_page 198
_version_ 1766251546313490432