Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?

The recently published Bedmap2 datasets mark the culmination of several decades of subice and subocean Antarctic topographic surveying by many nations, but maps of the topographic data distribution show that in the global context, the Antarctic bed remains very poorly sampled. Most of the remaining...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Author: Pritchard, Hamish
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/1/Pritchard.pdf
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:505322
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:505322 2023-05-15T13:48:08+02:00 Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping? Pritchard, Hamish 2014-12-01 text http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/ https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/1/Pritchard.pdf en eng Cambridge University Press https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/1/Pritchard.pdf Pritchard, Hamish orcid:0000-0003-2936-1734 . 2014 Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping? Antarctic Science, 26 (06). 742-757. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095410201400025X <https://doi.org/10.1017/S095410201400025X> cc_by CC-BY Publication - Article PeerReviewed 2014 ftnerc 2023-02-04T19:38:49Z The recently published Bedmap2 datasets mark the culmination of several decades of subice and subocean Antarctic topographic surveying by many nations, but maps of the topographic data distribution show that in the global context, the Antarctic bed remains very poorly sampled. Most of the remaining large unmapped areas on Earth lie under Antarctic ice and polar surveying continues to be difficult and expensive, thus it is important to identify where future efforts should be concentrated. A survey of 75 experts in various aspects of polar science shows that a lack of adequate topographic data is an important constraint in several themes, but the data gaps and the data needs do not tend to coincide. There is strong demand for higher resolution surveying in previously visited areas, particularly in the most dynamic and most rapidly changing regions as identified by glaciologists, oceanographers, hydrologists, biologists and geomorphologists, while geologists and ice core scientists focus on the most important areas for understanding Antarctica over deeper time. The data requirements identified here could be addressed for most areas given sufficient time and funding, but the technology needed to survey the interiors of the large ice shelf cavities has only just been developed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Antarctica ice core Ice Shelf Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Science 26 6 742 757
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language English
description The recently published Bedmap2 datasets mark the culmination of several decades of subice and subocean Antarctic topographic surveying by many nations, but maps of the topographic data distribution show that in the global context, the Antarctic bed remains very poorly sampled. Most of the remaining large unmapped areas on Earth lie under Antarctic ice and polar surveying continues to be difficult and expensive, thus it is important to identify where future efforts should be concentrated. A survey of 75 experts in various aspects of polar science shows that a lack of adequate topographic data is an important constraint in several themes, but the data gaps and the data needs do not tend to coincide. There is strong demand for higher resolution surveying in previously visited areas, particularly in the most dynamic and most rapidly changing regions as identified by glaciologists, oceanographers, hydrologists, biologists and geomorphologists, while geologists and ice core scientists focus on the most important areas for understanding Antarctica over deeper time. The data requirements identified here could be addressed for most areas given sufficient time and funding, but the technology needed to survey the interiors of the large ice shelf cavities has only just been developed.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Pritchard, Hamish
spellingShingle Pritchard, Hamish
Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?
author_facet Pritchard, Hamish
author_sort Pritchard, Hamish
title Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?
title_short Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?
title_full Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?
title_fullStr Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?
title_full_unstemmed Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?
title_sort bedgap – where next for antarctic subglacial mapping?
publisher Cambridge University Press
publishDate 2014
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/1/Pritchard.pdf
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
ice core
Ice Shelf
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
ice core
Ice Shelf
op_relation https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/1/Pritchard.pdf
Pritchard, Hamish orcid:0000-0003-2936-1734 . 2014 Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping? Antarctic Science, 26 (06). 742-757. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095410201400025X <https://doi.org/10.1017/S095410201400025X>
op_rights cc_by
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 26
container_issue 6
container_start_page 742
op_container_end_page 757
_version_ 1766248746237034496