Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?
The recently published Bedmap2 datasets mark the culmination of several decades of subice and subocean Antarctic topographic surveying by many nations, but maps of the topographic data distribution show that in the global context, the Antarctic bed remains very poorly sampled. Most of the remaining...
Published in: | Antarctic Science |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/ https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/1/Pritchard.pdf |
id |
ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:505322 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:505322 2023-05-15T13:48:08+02:00 Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping? Pritchard, Hamish 2014-12-01 text http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/ https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/1/Pritchard.pdf en eng Cambridge University Press https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/1/Pritchard.pdf Pritchard, Hamish orcid:0000-0003-2936-1734 . 2014 Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping? Antarctic Science, 26 (06). 742-757. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095410201400025X <https://doi.org/10.1017/S095410201400025X> cc_by CC-BY Publication - Article PeerReviewed 2014 ftnerc 2023-02-04T19:38:49Z The recently published Bedmap2 datasets mark the culmination of several decades of subice and subocean Antarctic topographic surveying by many nations, but maps of the topographic data distribution show that in the global context, the Antarctic bed remains very poorly sampled. Most of the remaining large unmapped areas on Earth lie under Antarctic ice and polar surveying continues to be difficult and expensive, thus it is important to identify where future efforts should be concentrated. A survey of 75 experts in various aspects of polar science shows that a lack of adequate topographic data is an important constraint in several themes, but the data gaps and the data needs do not tend to coincide. There is strong demand for higher resolution surveying in previously visited areas, particularly in the most dynamic and most rapidly changing regions as identified by glaciologists, oceanographers, hydrologists, biologists and geomorphologists, while geologists and ice core scientists focus on the most important areas for understanding Antarctica over deeper time. The data requirements identified here could be addressed for most areas given sufficient time and funding, but the technology needed to survey the interiors of the large ice shelf cavities has only just been developed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Antarctica ice core Ice Shelf Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Science 26 6 742 757 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive |
op_collection_id |
ftnerc |
language |
English |
description |
The recently published Bedmap2 datasets mark the culmination of several decades of subice and subocean Antarctic topographic surveying by many nations, but maps of the topographic data distribution show that in the global context, the Antarctic bed remains very poorly sampled. Most of the remaining large unmapped areas on Earth lie under Antarctic ice and polar surveying continues to be difficult and expensive, thus it is important to identify where future efforts should be concentrated. A survey of 75 experts in various aspects of polar science shows that a lack of adequate topographic data is an important constraint in several themes, but the data gaps and the data needs do not tend to coincide. There is strong demand for higher resolution surveying in previously visited areas, particularly in the most dynamic and most rapidly changing regions as identified by glaciologists, oceanographers, hydrologists, biologists and geomorphologists, while geologists and ice core scientists focus on the most important areas for understanding Antarctica over deeper time. The data requirements identified here could be addressed for most areas given sufficient time and funding, but the technology needed to survey the interiors of the large ice shelf cavities has only just been developed. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Pritchard, Hamish |
spellingShingle |
Pritchard, Hamish Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping? |
author_facet |
Pritchard, Hamish |
author_sort |
Pritchard, Hamish |
title |
Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping? |
title_short |
Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping? |
title_full |
Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping? |
title_fullStr |
Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping? |
title_sort |
bedgap – where next for antarctic subglacial mapping? |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/ https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/1/Pritchard.pdf |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Antarctica ice core Ice Shelf |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Antarctica ice core Ice Shelf |
op_relation |
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/505322/1/Pritchard.pdf Pritchard, Hamish orcid:0000-0003-2936-1734 . 2014 Bedgap – where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping? Antarctic Science, 26 (06). 742-757. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095410201400025X <https://doi.org/10.1017/S095410201400025X> |
op_rights |
cc_by |
op_rightsnorm |
CC-BY |
container_title |
Antarctic Science |
container_volume |
26 |
container_issue |
6 |
container_start_page |
742 |
op_container_end_page |
757 |
_version_ |
1766248746237034496 |