A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias
The Antarctic euphausiids Euphausia superba and E. crystallorophias were sampled using an 8 m2 rectangular midwater trawl inside the caldera of Deception Island. Specimens of the same species were collected on the same day from the strandline and sublittoral fringe within the caldera at a bay where...
Published in: | Polar Biology |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Springer-Verlag
1999
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/503042/ http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs003000050397.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397 |
id |
ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:503042 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:503042 2023-05-15T13:48:07+02:00 A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias Brierley, Andrew S. 1999 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/503042/ http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs003000050397.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397 unknown Springer-Verlag Brierley, Andrew S. 1999 A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias. Polar Biology, 22 (2). 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397> Publication - Article PeerReviewed 1999 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397 2023-02-04T19:37:38Z The Antarctic euphausiids Euphausia superba and E. crystallorophias were sampled using an 8 m2 rectangular midwater trawl inside the caldera of Deception Island. Specimens of the same species were collected on the same day from the strandline and sublittoral fringe within the caldera at a bay where these euphausiids had been incapacitated by high temperature geothermally heated waters. Differences between length frequency distributions of samples obtained by both methods were investigated once net-caught specimens had been subject to the simulated effects of geothermally heated waters. Differences between maturity stage/sex ratios for E. superba samples were also assessed. No significant differences between sizes of net-caught or beach-sampled E. crystallorophias were detected, but significant differences were found between both the sizes and sex/maturity stages for E. superba samples. Possible explanations for these differences are discussed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Deception Island Euphausia superba Polar Biology Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Antarctic The Antarctic Deception Island ENVELOPE(-60.633,-60.633,-62.950,-62.950) Polar Biology 22 2 109 114 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive |
op_collection_id |
ftnerc |
language |
unknown |
description |
The Antarctic euphausiids Euphausia superba and E. crystallorophias were sampled using an 8 m2 rectangular midwater trawl inside the caldera of Deception Island. Specimens of the same species were collected on the same day from the strandline and sublittoral fringe within the caldera at a bay where these euphausiids had been incapacitated by high temperature geothermally heated waters. Differences between length frequency distributions of samples obtained by both methods were investigated once net-caught specimens had been subject to the simulated effects of geothermally heated waters. Differences between maturity stage/sex ratios for E. superba samples were also assessed. No significant differences between sizes of net-caught or beach-sampled E. crystallorophias were detected, but significant differences were found between both the sizes and sex/maturity stages for E. superba samples. Possible explanations for these differences are discussed. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Brierley, Andrew S. |
spellingShingle |
Brierley, Andrew S. A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias |
author_facet |
Brierley, Andrew S. |
author_sort |
Brierley, Andrew S. |
title |
A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias |
title_short |
A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias |
title_full |
A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias |
title_sort |
comparison of antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias |
publisher |
Springer-Verlag |
publishDate |
1999 |
url |
http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/503042/ http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs003000050397.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-60.633,-60.633,-62.950,-62.950) |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic Deception Island |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic Deception Island |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Deception Island Euphausia superba Polar Biology |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Deception Island Euphausia superba Polar Biology |
op_relation |
Brierley, Andrew S. 1999 A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias. Polar Biology, 22 (2). 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397> |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397 |
container_title |
Polar Biology |
container_volume |
22 |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
109 |
op_container_end_page |
114 |
_version_ |
1766248674088714240 |