A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias

The Antarctic euphausiids Euphausia superba and E. crystallorophias were sampled using an 8 m2 rectangular midwater trawl inside the caldera of Deception Island. Specimens of the same species were collected on the same day from the strandline and sublittoral fringe within the caldera at a bay where...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Biology
Main Author: Brierley, Andrew S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Springer-Verlag 1999
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/503042/
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs003000050397.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:503042
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:503042 2023-05-15T13:48:07+02:00 A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias Brierley, Andrew S. 1999 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/503042/ http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs003000050397.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397 unknown Springer-Verlag Brierley, Andrew S. 1999 A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias. Polar Biology, 22 (2). 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397> Publication - Article PeerReviewed 1999 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397 2023-02-04T19:37:38Z The Antarctic euphausiids Euphausia superba and E. crystallorophias were sampled using an 8 m2 rectangular midwater trawl inside the caldera of Deception Island. Specimens of the same species were collected on the same day from the strandline and sublittoral fringe within the caldera at a bay where these euphausiids had been incapacitated by high temperature geothermally heated waters. Differences between length frequency distributions of samples obtained by both methods were investigated once net-caught specimens had been subject to the simulated effects of geothermally heated waters. Differences between maturity stage/sex ratios for E. superba samples were also assessed. No significant differences between sizes of net-caught or beach-sampled E. crystallorophias were detected, but significant differences were found between both the sizes and sex/maturity stages for E. superba samples. Possible explanations for these differences are discussed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Deception Island Euphausia superba Polar Biology Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Antarctic The Antarctic Deception Island ENVELOPE(-60.633,-60.633,-62.950,-62.950) Polar Biology 22 2 109 114
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language unknown
description The Antarctic euphausiids Euphausia superba and E. crystallorophias were sampled using an 8 m2 rectangular midwater trawl inside the caldera of Deception Island. Specimens of the same species were collected on the same day from the strandline and sublittoral fringe within the caldera at a bay where these euphausiids had been incapacitated by high temperature geothermally heated waters. Differences between length frequency distributions of samples obtained by both methods were investigated once net-caught specimens had been subject to the simulated effects of geothermally heated waters. Differences between maturity stage/sex ratios for E. superba samples were also assessed. No significant differences between sizes of net-caught or beach-sampled E. crystallorophias were detected, but significant differences were found between both the sizes and sex/maturity stages for E. superba samples. Possible explanations for these differences are discussed.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Brierley, Andrew S.
spellingShingle Brierley, Andrew S.
A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias
author_facet Brierley, Andrew S.
author_sort Brierley, Andrew S.
title A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias
title_short A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias
title_full A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias
title_fullStr A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias
title_sort comparison of antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias
publisher Springer-Verlag
publishDate 1999
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/503042/
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs003000050397.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397
long_lat ENVELOPE(-60.633,-60.633,-62.950,-62.950)
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
Deception Island
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
Deception Island
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Deception Island
Euphausia superba
Polar Biology
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Deception Island
Euphausia superba
Polar Biology
op_relation Brierley, Andrew S. 1999 A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally heated waters: insights into sampling bias. Polar Biology, 22 (2). 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397>
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050397
container_title Polar Biology
container_volume 22
container_issue 2
container_start_page 109
op_container_end_page 114
_version_ 1766248674088714240