Arctic Ocean freshwater: How robust are model simulations?

The Arctic freshwater (FW) has been the focus of many modeling studies, due to the potential impact of Arctic FW on the deep water formation in the North Atlantic. A comparison of the hindcasts from ten ocean-sea ice models shows that the simulation of the Arctic FW budget is quite different in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Main Authors: Jahn, A., Aksenov, Y., de Cuevas, B.A., de Steur, L., Häkkinen, S., Hansen, E., Herbaut, C., Houssais, M.-N., Karcher, M., Kauker, F., Lique, C., Nguyen, A., Pemberton, P., Worthen, D., Zhang, J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/443016/
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:443016
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:443016 2023-05-15T14:26:44+02:00 Arctic Ocean freshwater: How robust are model simulations? Jahn, A. Aksenov, Y. de Cuevas, B.A. de Steur, L. Häkkinen, S. Hansen, E. Herbaut, C. Houssais, M.-N. Karcher, M. Kauker, F. Lique, C. Nguyen, A. Pemberton, P. Worthen, D. Zhang, J. 2012 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/443016/ unknown Jahn, A.; Aksenov, Y. orcid:0000-0001-6132-3434 de Cuevas, B.A.; de Steur, L.; Häkkinen, S.; Hansen, E.; Herbaut, C.; Houssais, M.-N.; Karcher, M.; Kauker, F.; Lique, C.; Nguyen, A.; Pemberton, P.; Worthen, D.; Zhang, J. 2012 Arctic Ocean freshwater: How robust are model simulations? Journal of Geophysical Research, 117. C00D16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC007907 <https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC007907> Publication - Article PeerReviewed 2012 ftnerc 2023-02-04T19:36:05Z The Arctic freshwater (FW) has been the focus of many modeling studies, due to the potential impact of Arctic FW on the deep water formation in the North Atlantic. A comparison of the hindcasts from ten ocean-sea ice models shows that the simulation of the Arctic FW budget is quite different in the investigated models. While they agree on the general sink and source terms of the Arctic FW budget, the long-term means as well as the variability of the FW export vary among models. The best model-to-model agreement is found for the interannual and seasonal variability of the solid FW export and the solid FW storage, which also agree well with observations. For the interannual and seasonal variability of the liquid FW export, the agreement among models is better for the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) than for Fram Strait. The reason for this is that models are more consistent in simulating volume flux anomalies than salinity anomalies and volume-flux anomalies dominate the liquid FW export variability in the CAA but not in Fram Strait. The seasonal cycle of the liquid FW export generally shows a better agreement among models than the interannual variability, and compared to observations the models capture the seasonality of the liquid FW export rather well. In order to improve future simulations of the Arctic FW budget, the simulation of the salinity field needs to be improved, so that model results on the variability of the liquid FW export and storage become more robust. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Archipelago Arctic Arctic Ocean Canadian Arctic Archipelago Fram Strait North Atlantic Sea ice Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Arctic Arctic Ocean Canadian Arctic Archipelago Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 117 C8 n/a n/a
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language unknown
description The Arctic freshwater (FW) has been the focus of many modeling studies, due to the potential impact of Arctic FW on the deep water formation in the North Atlantic. A comparison of the hindcasts from ten ocean-sea ice models shows that the simulation of the Arctic FW budget is quite different in the investigated models. While they agree on the general sink and source terms of the Arctic FW budget, the long-term means as well as the variability of the FW export vary among models. The best model-to-model agreement is found for the interannual and seasonal variability of the solid FW export and the solid FW storage, which also agree well with observations. For the interannual and seasonal variability of the liquid FW export, the agreement among models is better for the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) than for Fram Strait. The reason for this is that models are more consistent in simulating volume flux anomalies than salinity anomalies and volume-flux anomalies dominate the liquid FW export variability in the CAA but not in Fram Strait. The seasonal cycle of the liquid FW export generally shows a better agreement among models than the interannual variability, and compared to observations the models capture the seasonality of the liquid FW export rather well. In order to improve future simulations of the Arctic FW budget, the simulation of the salinity field needs to be improved, so that model results on the variability of the liquid FW export and storage become more robust.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jahn, A.
Aksenov, Y.
de Cuevas, B.A.
de Steur, L.
Häkkinen, S.
Hansen, E.
Herbaut, C.
Houssais, M.-N.
Karcher, M.
Kauker, F.
Lique, C.
Nguyen, A.
Pemberton, P.
Worthen, D.
Zhang, J.
spellingShingle Jahn, A.
Aksenov, Y.
de Cuevas, B.A.
de Steur, L.
Häkkinen, S.
Hansen, E.
Herbaut, C.
Houssais, M.-N.
Karcher, M.
Kauker, F.
Lique, C.
Nguyen, A.
Pemberton, P.
Worthen, D.
Zhang, J.
Arctic Ocean freshwater: How robust are model simulations?
author_facet Jahn, A.
Aksenov, Y.
de Cuevas, B.A.
de Steur, L.
Häkkinen, S.
Hansen, E.
Herbaut, C.
Houssais, M.-N.
Karcher, M.
Kauker, F.
Lique, C.
Nguyen, A.
Pemberton, P.
Worthen, D.
Zhang, J.
author_sort Jahn, A.
title Arctic Ocean freshwater: How robust are model simulations?
title_short Arctic Ocean freshwater: How robust are model simulations?
title_full Arctic Ocean freshwater: How robust are model simulations?
title_fullStr Arctic Ocean freshwater: How robust are model simulations?
title_full_unstemmed Arctic Ocean freshwater: How robust are model simulations?
title_sort arctic ocean freshwater: how robust are model simulations?
publishDate 2012
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/443016/
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Canadian Arctic Archipelago
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Canadian Arctic Archipelago
genre Arctic
Arctic Archipelago
Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Canadian Arctic Archipelago
Fram Strait
North Atlantic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Archipelago
Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Canadian Arctic Archipelago
Fram Strait
North Atlantic
Sea ice
op_relation Jahn, A.; Aksenov, Y. orcid:0000-0001-6132-3434
de Cuevas, B.A.; de Steur, L.; Häkkinen, S.; Hansen, E.; Herbaut, C.; Houssais, M.-N.; Karcher, M.; Kauker, F.; Lique, C.; Nguyen, A.; Pemberton, P.; Worthen, D.; Zhang, J. 2012 Arctic Ocean freshwater: How robust are model simulations? Journal of Geophysical Research, 117. C00D16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC007907 <https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC007907>
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
container_volume 117
container_issue C8
container_start_page n/a
op_container_end_page n/a
_version_ 1766300132468326400