Trends in river floods: why is there no clear signal in observations?

Floods are of great concern in many areas of the world, with the last decade seeing major fluvial flood events in, for example, Asia, Europe and North America. This has focused attention on whether or not these are a result of a changing climate. River flows calculated from outputs from global clima...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Svensson, C., Hannaford, J., Kundzewicz, A. W., Marsh, T. J.
Other Authors: Tchiguuirinskaia, I., Thein, K. N. N., Hubert, P.
Format: Conference Object
Language:unknown
Published: IAHS 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/3187/
http://iahs.info/redbooks/a305/305001.htm
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:3187
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:3187 2024-06-09T07:48:21+00:00 Trends in river floods: why is there no clear signal in observations? Svensson, C. Hannaford, J. Kundzewicz, A. W. Marsh, T. J. Tchiguuirinskaia, I. Thein, K. N. N. Hubert, P. 2006 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/3187/ http://iahs.info/redbooks/a305/305001.htm unknown IAHS Svensson, C.; Hannaford, J. orcid:0000-0002-5256-3310 Kundzewicz, A. W.; Marsh, T. J. 2006 Trends in river floods: why is there no clear signal in observations? In: Frontiers in flood research, 8th Kovacs Colloquium, UNESCO, Paris, 30 June - 1 July 2006. IAHS, 1-18. Ecology and Environment Hydrology Publication - Conference Item NonPeerReviewed 2006 ftnerc 2024-05-15T08:44:37Z Floods are of great concern in many areas of the world, with the last decade seeing major fluvial flood events in, for example, Asia, Europe and North America. This has focused attention on whether or not these are a result of a changing climate. River flows calculated from outputs from global climate models often suggest that high river flows will increase in a warmer, future climate. However, the future projections are not necessarily in tune with the records collected so far—the observational evidence is more ambiguous. A recent study of trends in long time series of annual maximum river flows at 195 gauging stations worldwide suggests that the majority of these flow records (70%) do not exhibit any statistically significant trends. Trends in the remaining records are almost evenly split between having a positive and a negative direction. This paper discusses factors that influence the results of trend estimates of floods, and that contribute to the general lack of compelling observational evidence of any long-term increase in extreme river flows. Recent results of trend analysis of observed floods are outlined. Expected impacts of indirect anthropogenic climate change are discussed, and a summary is given of the direct impact of man’s influence on river flows in terms of catchment and river management. Different methodologies to detect trends are briefly outlined, and examples are given of how the choice of method can interact with climatological features to result in different estimates of trend. The examples illustrate the effects of using different types of flow indices and different periods of record. The effects on trend estimates of decadal-scale oscillations that have been shown to occur in many river flow records are discussed. Oscillations compound the problem of untangling trends from normal climatic variability as the cycles of the underlying climatic phenomena (e.g. the North Atlantic Oscillation) may also be predicted to change in a greenhouse gas-induced warmer climate. Initiatives to compile ... Conference Object North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language unknown
topic Ecology and Environment
Hydrology
spellingShingle Ecology and Environment
Hydrology
Svensson, C.
Hannaford, J.
Kundzewicz, A. W.
Marsh, T. J.
Trends in river floods: why is there no clear signal in observations?
topic_facet Ecology and Environment
Hydrology
description Floods are of great concern in many areas of the world, with the last decade seeing major fluvial flood events in, for example, Asia, Europe and North America. This has focused attention on whether or not these are a result of a changing climate. River flows calculated from outputs from global climate models often suggest that high river flows will increase in a warmer, future climate. However, the future projections are not necessarily in tune with the records collected so far—the observational evidence is more ambiguous. A recent study of trends in long time series of annual maximum river flows at 195 gauging stations worldwide suggests that the majority of these flow records (70%) do not exhibit any statistically significant trends. Trends in the remaining records are almost evenly split between having a positive and a negative direction. This paper discusses factors that influence the results of trend estimates of floods, and that contribute to the general lack of compelling observational evidence of any long-term increase in extreme river flows. Recent results of trend analysis of observed floods are outlined. Expected impacts of indirect anthropogenic climate change are discussed, and a summary is given of the direct impact of man’s influence on river flows in terms of catchment and river management. Different methodologies to detect trends are briefly outlined, and examples are given of how the choice of method can interact with climatological features to result in different estimates of trend. The examples illustrate the effects of using different types of flow indices and different periods of record. The effects on trend estimates of decadal-scale oscillations that have been shown to occur in many river flow records are discussed. Oscillations compound the problem of untangling trends from normal climatic variability as the cycles of the underlying climatic phenomena (e.g. the North Atlantic Oscillation) may also be predicted to change in a greenhouse gas-induced warmer climate. Initiatives to compile ...
author2 Tchiguuirinskaia, I.
Thein, K. N. N.
Hubert, P.
format Conference Object
author Svensson, C.
Hannaford, J.
Kundzewicz, A. W.
Marsh, T. J.
author_facet Svensson, C.
Hannaford, J.
Kundzewicz, A. W.
Marsh, T. J.
author_sort Svensson, C.
title Trends in river floods: why is there no clear signal in observations?
title_short Trends in river floods: why is there no clear signal in observations?
title_full Trends in river floods: why is there no clear signal in observations?
title_fullStr Trends in river floods: why is there no clear signal in observations?
title_full_unstemmed Trends in river floods: why is there no clear signal in observations?
title_sort trends in river floods: why is there no clear signal in observations?
publisher IAHS
publishDate 2006
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/3187/
http://iahs.info/redbooks/a305/305001.htm
genre North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
genre_facet North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
op_relation Svensson, C.; Hannaford, J. orcid:0000-0002-5256-3310
Kundzewicz, A. W.; Marsh, T. J. 2006 Trends in river floods: why is there no clear signal in observations? In: Frontiers in flood research, 8th Kovacs Colloquium, UNESCO, Paris, 30 June - 1 July 2006. IAHS, 1-18.
_version_ 1801380027287207936