Surface forcing of the North Atlantic: accuracy and variability

A new methodology to estimate the turbulent air – sea heat and moisture fluxes and their uncertainty is developed and assessed using Voluntary Observing Ship (VOS) observations. Whilst important drivers of the global oceanic and atmospheric circulation these fluxes remain poorly quantified, both in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Berry, David Inglis
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/245001/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/245001/1/Berry_2009_PhD.pdf
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:245001
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:245001 2023-05-15T17:36:04+02:00 Surface forcing of the North Atlantic: accuracy and variability Berry, David Inglis 2009-11 application/pdf http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/245001/ https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/245001/1/Berry_2009_PhD.pdf en eng https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/245001/1/Berry_2009_PhD.pdf Berry, David Inglis. 2009 Surface forcing of the North Atlantic: accuracy and variability. University of Southampton, School of Ocean and Earth Science, PhD Thesis, 176pp. Publication - Thesis NonPeerReviewed 2009 ftnerc 2023-02-04T19:35:37Z A new methodology to estimate the turbulent air – sea heat and moisture fluxes and their uncertainty is developed and assessed using Voluntary Observing Ship (VOS) observations. Whilst important drivers of the global oceanic and atmospheric circulation these fluxes remain poorly quantified, both in terms of mean value and uncertainty. The new methodology addresses both of these issues and is extensible to other data sources. The individual observations are first bias and height adjusted to remove systematic errors and the impact of changing observing heights. They are then characterised in terms of random errors using a semi-variogram analysis and a range of variogram models. The data quality and sampling are then taken into account using optimal interpolation (OI) to grid the observations, producing daily mean fields and uncertainty estimates. These are then used to estimate the fluxes and flux uncertainty on both daily and monthly time scales. Comparisons of the mean fields and fluxes to the original input data and to independent buoy observations show the fields not to be significantly biased. The adjustments applied before gridding and flux calculation are also shown to improve the agreement with the buoy observations. The uncertainty estimates are assessed using a series of cross validation experiments and 3-way error analyses to make alternative estimates of the uncertainty. These alternative estimates are shown to be of the same order of magnitude as the OI uncertainty estimates and generally to be within 10 – 20% of the OI estimate. Whilst all three estimates are similar there are some systematic differences. The OI uncertainty estimates tend to be lower (higher) than the alternative estimates in high (low) variability regions. The representation of the variability in the new dataset is examined and shown to be improved compared to previous VOS based datasets. The adjustments are shown to have little impact on the temporal trends in temperature and humidity whilst reducing the wind speed and sensible and ... Text North Atlantic Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language English
description A new methodology to estimate the turbulent air – sea heat and moisture fluxes and their uncertainty is developed and assessed using Voluntary Observing Ship (VOS) observations. Whilst important drivers of the global oceanic and atmospheric circulation these fluxes remain poorly quantified, both in terms of mean value and uncertainty. The new methodology addresses both of these issues and is extensible to other data sources. The individual observations are first bias and height adjusted to remove systematic errors and the impact of changing observing heights. They are then characterised in terms of random errors using a semi-variogram analysis and a range of variogram models. The data quality and sampling are then taken into account using optimal interpolation (OI) to grid the observations, producing daily mean fields and uncertainty estimates. These are then used to estimate the fluxes and flux uncertainty on both daily and monthly time scales. Comparisons of the mean fields and fluxes to the original input data and to independent buoy observations show the fields not to be significantly biased. The adjustments applied before gridding and flux calculation are also shown to improve the agreement with the buoy observations. The uncertainty estimates are assessed using a series of cross validation experiments and 3-way error analyses to make alternative estimates of the uncertainty. These alternative estimates are shown to be of the same order of magnitude as the OI uncertainty estimates and generally to be within 10 – 20% of the OI estimate. Whilst all three estimates are similar there are some systematic differences. The OI uncertainty estimates tend to be lower (higher) than the alternative estimates in high (low) variability regions. The representation of the variability in the new dataset is examined and shown to be improved compared to previous VOS based datasets. The adjustments are shown to have little impact on the temporal trends in temperature and humidity whilst reducing the wind speed and sensible and ...
format Text
author Berry, David Inglis
spellingShingle Berry, David Inglis
Surface forcing of the North Atlantic: accuracy and variability
author_facet Berry, David Inglis
author_sort Berry, David Inglis
title Surface forcing of the North Atlantic: accuracy and variability
title_short Surface forcing of the North Atlantic: accuracy and variability
title_full Surface forcing of the North Atlantic: accuracy and variability
title_fullStr Surface forcing of the North Atlantic: accuracy and variability
title_full_unstemmed Surface forcing of the North Atlantic: accuracy and variability
title_sort surface forcing of the north atlantic: accuracy and variability
publishDate 2009
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/245001/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/245001/1/Berry_2009_PhD.pdf
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_relation https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/245001/1/Berry_2009_PhD.pdf
Berry, David Inglis. 2009 Surface forcing of the North Atlantic: accuracy and variability. University of Southampton, School of Ocean and Earth Science, PhD Thesis, 176pp.
_version_ 1766135435876106240