Acidification effects on biofouling communities: winners and losers

How ocean acidification affects marine life is a major concern for science and society. However, its impacts on encrusting biofouling communities, that are both the initial colonizers of hard substrata and of great economic importance, are almost unknown. We showed that community composition changed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global Change Biology
Main Authors: Peck, Lloyd S., Clark, Melody S., Power, Deborah, Reis, Joao, Batista, Frederico M., Harper, Elizabeth M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/21020/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/21020/1/Acidification%20effects%20on%20biofouling%20communities_%20winners%20and%20losers%20-%20Peck%20-%202015.pdf
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:21020
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:21020 2023-05-15T17:51:29+02:00 Acidification effects on biofouling communities: winners and losers Peck, Lloyd S. Clark, Melody S. Power, Deborah Reis, Joao Batista, Frederico M. Harper, Elizabeth M. 2015-05 text http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/21020/ https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/21020/1/Acidification%20effects%20on%20biofouling%20communities_%20winners%20and%20losers%20-%20Peck%20-%202015.pdf en eng https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/21020/1/Acidification%20effects%20on%20biofouling%20communities_%20winners%20and%20losers%20-%20Peck%20-%202015.pdf Peck, Lloyd S. orcid:0000-0003-3479-6791 Clark, Melody S. orcid:0000-0002-3442-3824 Power, Deborah; Reis, Joao; Batista, Frederico M.; Harper, Elizabeth M. 2015 Acidification effects on biofouling communities: winners and losers. Global Change Biology, 21 (5). 1907-1913. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12841 <https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12841> cc_by_4 CC-BY Publication - Article PeerReviewed 2015 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12841 2023-02-04T19:33:12Z How ocean acidification affects marine life is a major concern for science and society. However, its impacts on encrusting biofouling communities, that are both the initial colonizers of hard substrata and of great economic importance, are almost unknown. We showed that community composition changed significantly, from 92% spirorbids, 3% ascidians and 4% sponges initially to 47% spirorbids, 23% ascidians and 29% sponges after 100 days in acidified conditions (pH 7.7). In low pH, numbers of the spirorbid Neodexiospira pseudocorrugata were reduced ×5 compared to controls. The two ascidians present behaved differently with Aplidium sp. decreasing ×10 in pH 7.7, whereas Molgula sp. numbers were ×4 higher in low pH than controls. Calcareous sponge (Leucosolenia sp.) numbers increased ×2.5 in pH 7.7 over controls. The diatom and filamentous algal community was also more poorly developed in the low pH treatments compared to controls. Colonization of new surfaces likewise showed large decreases in spirorbid numbers, but numbers of sponges and Molgula sp. increased. Spirorbid losses appeared due to both recruitment failure and loss of existing tubes. Spirorbid tubes are comprised of a loose prismatic fabric of calcite crystals. Loss of tube materials appeared due to changes in the binding matrix and not crystal dissolution, as SEM analyses showed crystal surfaces were not pitted or dissolved in low pH conditions. Biofouling communities face dramatic future changes with reductions in groups with hard exposed exoskeletons and domination by soft-bodied ascidians and sponges. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ocean acidification Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Global Change Biology 21 5 1907 1913
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language English
description How ocean acidification affects marine life is a major concern for science and society. However, its impacts on encrusting biofouling communities, that are both the initial colonizers of hard substrata and of great economic importance, are almost unknown. We showed that community composition changed significantly, from 92% spirorbids, 3% ascidians and 4% sponges initially to 47% spirorbids, 23% ascidians and 29% sponges after 100 days in acidified conditions (pH 7.7). In low pH, numbers of the spirorbid Neodexiospira pseudocorrugata were reduced ×5 compared to controls. The two ascidians present behaved differently with Aplidium sp. decreasing ×10 in pH 7.7, whereas Molgula sp. numbers were ×4 higher in low pH than controls. Calcareous sponge (Leucosolenia sp.) numbers increased ×2.5 in pH 7.7 over controls. The diatom and filamentous algal community was also more poorly developed in the low pH treatments compared to controls. Colonization of new surfaces likewise showed large decreases in spirorbid numbers, but numbers of sponges and Molgula sp. increased. Spirorbid losses appeared due to both recruitment failure and loss of existing tubes. Spirorbid tubes are comprised of a loose prismatic fabric of calcite crystals. Loss of tube materials appeared due to changes in the binding matrix and not crystal dissolution, as SEM analyses showed crystal surfaces were not pitted or dissolved in low pH conditions. Biofouling communities face dramatic future changes with reductions in groups with hard exposed exoskeletons and domination by soft-bodied ascidians and sponges.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Peck, Lloyd S.
Clark, Melody S.
Power, Deborah
Reis, Joao
Batista, Frederico M.
Harper, Elizabeth M.
spellingShingle Peck, Lloyd S.
Clark, Melody S.
Power, Deborah
Reis, Joao
Batista, Frederico M.
Harper, Elizabeth M.
Acidification effects on biofouling communities: winners and losers
author_facet Peck, Lloyd S.
Clark, Melody S.
Power, Deborah
Reis, Joao
Batista, Frederico M.
Harper, Elizabeth M.
author_sort Peck, Lloyd S.
title Acidification effects on biofouling communities: winners and losers
title_short Acidification effects on biofouling communities: winners and losers
title_full Acidification effects on biofouling communities: winners and losers
title_fullStr Acidification effects on biofouling communities: winners and losers
title_full_unstemmed Acidification effects on biofouling communities: winners and losers
title_sort acidification effects on biofouling communities: winners and losers
publishDate 2015
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/21020/
https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/21020/1/Acidification%20effects%20on%20biofouling%20communities_%20winners%20and%20losers%20-%20Peck%20-%202015.pdf
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_relation https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/21020/1/Acidification%20effects%20on%20biofouling%20communities_%20winners%20and%20losers%20-%20Peck%20-%202015.pdf
Peck, Lloyd S. orcid:0000-0003-3479-6791
Clark, Melody S. orcid:0000-0002-3442-3824
Power, Deborah; Reis, Joao; Batista, Frederico M.; Harper, Elizabeth M. 2015 Acidification effects on biofouling communities: winners and losers. Global Change Biology, 21 (5). 1907-1913. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12841 <https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12841>
op_rights cc_by_4
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12841
container_title Global Change Biology
container_volume 21
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1907
op_container_end_page 1913
_version_ 1766158651170488320