Judging quality in science. (Editorial)
The joint inspection report by Australia, Peru and the United Kingdom, presented at the last ATCM in Stockholm, contained an unusual recommendation. On the basis of the science that they had seen at the research stations the inspection team had concluded that there was both very good science and ver...
Published in: | Antarctic Science |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2005
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/2042/ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102005002993 |
id |
ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:2042 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:2042 2024-06-09T07:39:57+00:00 Judging quality in science. (Editorial) Walton, David 2005 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/2042/ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102005002993 unknown Cambridge University Press Walton, David orcid:0000-0002-7103-4043 . 2005 Judging quality in science. (Editorial). Antarctic Science, 17 (4). 481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102005002993 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102005002993> Science Policy Publication - Article NonPeerReviewed 2005 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102005002993 2024-05-15T08:42:16Z The joint inspection report by Australia, Peru and the United Kingdom, presented at the last ATCM in Stockholm, contained an unusual recommendation. On the basis of the science that they had seen at the research stations the inspection team had concluded that there was both very good science and very poor science being undertaken. They apparently believed that this pattern was probably true of the whole continent but needed a more expert examination. Their recommendation was that SCAR should undertake an in situ assessment of all scientific research in the Antarctic. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Science 17 4 481 486 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive |
op_collection_id |
ftnerc |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Science Policy |
spellingShingle |
Science Policy Walton, David Judging quality in science. (Editorial) |
topic_facet |
Science Policy |
description |
The joint inspection report by Australia, Peru and the United Kingdom, presented at the last ATCM in Stockholm, contained an unusual recommendation. On the basis of the science that they had seen at the research stations the inspection team had concluded that there was both very good science and very poor science being undertaken. They apparently believed that this pattern was probably true of the whole continent but needed a more expert examination. Their recommendation was that SCAR should undertake an in situ assessment of all scientific research in the Antarctic. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Walton, David |
author_facet |
Walton, David |
author_sort |
Walton, David |
title |
Judging quality in science. (Editorial) |
title_short |
Judging quality in science. (Editorial) |
title_full |
Judging quality in science. (Editorial) |
title_fullStr |
Judging quality in science. (Editorial) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judging quality in science. (Editorial) |
title_sort |
judging quality in science. (editorial) |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press |
publishDate |
2005 |
url |
http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/2042/ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102005002993 |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science |
op_relation |
Walton, David orcid:0000-0002-7103-4043 . 2005 Judging quality in science. (Editorial). Antarctic Science, 17 (4). 481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102005002993 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102005002993> |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102005002993 |
container_title |
Antarctic Science |
container_volume |
17 |
container_issue |
4 |
container_start_page |
481 |
op_container_end_page |
486 |
_version_ |
1801383409202757632 |