Differences in foraging behaviour and feeding ecology in giant petrels

The two sibling species of giant petrels (northern Macronectes halli and the southern M. giganteus), the dominant scavengers of the sub-Antarctic and Antarctic environment, are one of the best examples of sexual segregation in avian foraging and feeding ecology. During breeding, males and females fe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gonzáles-Solís, J., Croxall, J.P.
Other Authors: Ruckstuhl, K.E., Neuhaus, P.
Format: Book Part
Language:unknown
Published: Cambridge University Press 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/17879/
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:17879
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:17879 2023-05-15T13:45:12+02:00 Differences in foraging behaviour and feeding ecology in giant petrels Gonzáles-Solís, J. Croxall, J.P. Ruckstuhl, K.E. Neuhaus, P. 2005 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/17879/ unknown Cambridge University Press Gonzáles-Solís, J.; Croxall, J.P. 2005 Differences in foraging behaviour and feeding ecology in giant petrels. In: Ruckstuhl, K.E.; Neuhaus, P., (eds.) Sexual segregation in vertebrates: ecology of the two sexes. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 92-111. Publication - Book Section NonPeerReviewed 2005 ftnerc 2023-02-04T19:31:21Z The two sibling species of giant petrels (northern Macronectes halli and the southern M. giganteus), the dominant scavengers of the sub-Antarctic and Antarctic environment, are one of the best examples of sexual segregation in avian foraging and feeding ecology. During breeding, males and females feed mainly on penguin and seal carrion, but females also feed extensively on marine prey such as cephalopods, fish and krill. Sexual differences in diet are reflected not only in analyses of regurgitations, but also in the isotopic composition of carbon and nitrogen, as well as in their heavy metal burdens. Direct observations and tracking of pelagic movements showed that males of both species usually forage closer to the breeding grounds, exploiting carcasses on beaches, whereas females show more pelagic habits. In consequence, foraging effort, foraging efficiency, predictability of resources exploited, optimum foraging time and activity budgets differ between sexes. During winter, however, studies on activity and pelagic movements suggest more similar feeding habits between sexes. Overall, differences in foraging and feeding ecology are probably related to the substantial sexual size dimorphism; males of both species are 16–35% heavier and have disproportionately larger bills than females. The importance of size in contest competition to access carrion may explain their large body size as well as the competitive exclusion of females from coastal habitats, reducing intraspecific competition for food. Ultimately, a differential exploitation of carrion probably increased sexual dimorphism not only in body size but also in the feeding structures such as bill size. Book Part Antarc* Antarctic Giant Petrels Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Antarctic Giganteus ENVELOPE(62.500,62.500,-67.567,-67.567)
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language unknown
description The two sibling species of giant petrels (northern Macronectes halli and the southern M. giganteus), the dominant scavengers of the sub-Antarctic and Antarctic environment, are one of the best examples of sexual segregation in avian foraging and feeding ecology. During breeding, males and females feed mainly on penguin and seal carrion, but females also feed extensively on marine prey such as cephalopods, fish and krill. Sexual differences in diet are reflected not only in analyses of regurgitations, but also in the isotopic composition of carbon and nitrogen, as well as in their heavy metal burdens. Direct observations and tracking of pelagic movements showed that males of both species usually forage closer to the breeding grounds, exploiting carcasses on beaches, whereas females show more pelagic habits. In consequence, foraging effort, foraging efficiency, predictability of resources exploited, optimum foraging time and activity budgets differ between sexes. During winter, however, studies on activity and pelagic movements suggest more similar feeding habits between sexes. Overall, differences in foraging and feeding ecology are probably related to the substantial sexual size dimorphism; males of both species are 16–35% heavier and have disproportionately larger bills than females. The importance of size in contest competition to access carrion may explain their large body size as well as the competitive exclusion of females from coastal habitats, reducing intraspecific competition for food. Ultimately, a differential exploitation of carrion probably increased sexual dimorphism not only in body size but also in the feeding structures such as bill size.
author2 Ruckstuhl, K.E.
Neuhaus, P.
format Book Part
author Gonzáles-Solís, J.
Croxall, J.P.
spellingShingle Gonzáles-Solís, J.
Croxall, J.P.
Differences in foraging behaviour and feeding ecology in giant petrels
author_facet Gonzáles-Solís, J.
Croxall, J.P.
author_sort Gonzáles-Solís, J.
title Differences in foraging behaviour and feeding ecology in giant petrels
title_short Differences in foraging behaviour and feeding ecology in giant petrels
title_full Differences in foraging behaviour and feeding ecology in giant petrels
title_fullStr Differences in foraging behaviour and feeding ecology in giant petrels
title_full_unstemmed Differences in foraging behaviour and feeding ecology in giant petrels
title_sort differences in foraging behaviour and feeding ecology in giant petrels
publisher Cambridge University Press
publishDate 2005
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/17879/
long_lat ENVELOPE(62.500,62.500,-67.567,-67.567)
geographic Antarctic
Giganteus
geographic_facet Antarctic
Giganteus
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Giant Petrels
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Giant Petrels
op_relation Gonzáles-Solís, J.; Croxall, J.P. 2005 Differences in foraging behaviour and feeding ecology in giant petrels. In: Ruckstuhl, K.E.; Neuhaus, P., (eds.) Sexual segregation in vertebrates: ecology of the two sexes. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 92-111.
_version_ 1766216464289759232