How momentum advection schemes influence current-topography interactions at eddy permitting resolution

Recent studies have shown that the use of an enstrophy-and-energy-conserving momentum advection scheme substantially reduces widespread biases of mean currents in the global 1/4° DRAKKAR model. This paper investigates the origin of these improvements. A series of sensitivity simulations with differe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean Modelling
Main Authors: Le Sommer, Julien, Penduff, Thierry, Theetten, Sébastien, Madec, Gurvan, Barnier, Bernard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/166223/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.11.007
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:166223
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:166223 2023-05-15T17:25:19+02:00 How momentum advection schemes influence current-topography interactions at eddy permitting resolution Le Sommer, Julien Penduff, Thierry Theetten, Sébastien Madec, Gurvan Barnier, Bernard 2009 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/166223/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.11.007 unknown Le Sommer, Julien; Penduff, Thierry; Theetten, Sébastien; Madec, Gurvan; Barnier, Bernard. 2009 How momentum advection schemes influence current-topography interactions at eddy permitting resolution. Ocean Modelling, 29 (1). 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.11.007 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.11.007> Publication - Article PeerReviewed 2009 ftnerc https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.11.007 2023-02-04T19:35:29Z Recent studies have shown that the use of an enstrophy-and-energy-conserving momentum advection scheme substantially reduces widespread biases of mean currents in the global 1/4° DRAKKAR model. This paper investigates the origin of these improvements. A series of sensitivity simulations with different momentum advection schemes is performed with the North Atlantic 1/4° DRAKKAR model. Three second order momentum advection schemes conserving, respectively, enstrophy (ens), energy (efx) and both quantities (een) are tested and their impact on the model solution are compared. The mean kinetic energy vertical profile is found to change up to 10% depending on the chosen scheme. This sensitivity is maximum in bottom layers. The analysis of the vorticity tendency due to horizontal momentum advection reveals that the three schemes differ mostly in bottom layers as well. The average magnitude of this term is enhanced with the efx scheme and reduced with the een scheme. These differences are found to be consistent with the instantaneous tendency of each scheme. In addition, we show that the differences between the schemes are related to the grid-scale irregularity of the velocity field. Both the grid scale irregularity and the differences between the schemes are found to be enhanced in bottom layers. We conclude that the model solution depends crucially on the ability of the momentum advection scheme to handle under-resolved flows close to the bottom topography. This work emphasizes the critical influence of topography in eddy-active regions on mean circulation features such as the position of the North-Atlantic current or the Gulf Stream separation. Article in Journal/Newspaper north atlantic current North Atlantic Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Ocean Modelling 29 1 1 14
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language unknown
description Recent studies have shown that the use of an enstrophy-and-energy-conserving momentum advection scheme substantially reduces widespread biases of mean currents in the global 1/4° DRAKKAR model. This paper investigates the origin of these improvements. A series of sensitivity simulations with different momentum advection schemes is performed with the North Atlantic 1/4° DRAKKAR model. Three second order momentum advection schemes conserving, respectively, enstrophy (ens), energy (efx) and both quantities (een) are tested and their impact on the model solution are compared. The mean kinetic energy vertical profile is found to change up to 10% depending on the chosen scheme. This sensitivity is maximum in bottom layers. The analysis of the vorticity tendency due to horizontal momentum advection reveals that the three schemes differ mostly in bottom layers as well. The average magnitude of this term is enhanced with the efx scheme and reduced with the een scheme. These differences are found to be consistent with the instantaneous tendency of each scheme. In addition, we show that the differences between the schemes are related to the grid-scale irregularity of the velocity field. Both the grid scale irregularity and the differences between the schemes are found to be enhanced in bottom layers. We conclude that the model solution depends crucially on the ability of the momentum advection scheme to handle under-resolved flows close to the bottom topography. This work emphasizes the critical influence of topography in eddy-active regions on mean circulation features such as the position of the North-Atlantic current or the Gulf Stream separation.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Le Sommer, Julien
Penduff, Thierry
Theetten, Sébastien
Madec, Gurvan
Barnier, Bernard
spellingShingle Le Sommer, Julien
Penduff, Thierry
Theetten, Sébastien
Madec, Gurvan
Barnier, Bernard
How momentum advection schemes influence current-topography interactions at eddy permitting resolution
author_facet Le Sommer, Julien
Penduff, Thierry
Theetten, Sébastien
Madec, Gurvan
Barnier, Bernard
author_sort Le Sommer, Julien
title How momentum advection schemes influence current-topography interactions at eddy permitting resolution
title_short How momentum advection schemes influence current-topography interactions at eddy permitting resolution
title_full How momentum advection schemes influence current-topography interactions at eddy permitting resolution
title_fullStr How momentum advection schemes influence current-topography interactions at eddy permitting resolution
title_full_unstemmed How momentum advection schemes influence current-topography interactions at eddy permitting resolution
title_sort how momentum advection schemes influence current-topography interactions at eddy permitting resolution
publishDate 2009
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/166223/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.11.007
genre north atlantic current
North Atlantic
genre_facet north atlantic current
North Atlantic
op_relation Le Sommer, Julien; Penduff, Thierry; Theetten, Sébastien; Madec, Gurvan; Barnier, Bernard. 2009 How momentum advection schemes influence current-topography interactions at eddy permitting resolution. Ocean Modelling, 29 (1). 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.11.007 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.11.007>
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.11.007
container_title Ocean Modelling
container_volume 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 14
_version_ 1766116710316769280