A placename geography for Antarctica

Placenames in Antarctica are uniquely complex. Antarctica’s distinctive political environment results in a situation where many national bodies confer names, but until recently there has been no coordination of this activity. The consequence of this is that many features are multiply named. The poor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cooper, A. Paul R., Fretwell, Peter
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Society of Cartographers 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/12727/
id ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:12727
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnerc:oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:12727 2023-05-15T13:45:11+02:00 A placename geography for Antarctica Cooper, A. Paul R. Fretwell, Peter 2003 http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/12727/ unknown Society of Cartographers Cooper, A. Paul R.; Fretwell, Peter orcid:0000-0002-1988-5844 . 2003 A placename geography for Antarctica. Bulletin of the Society of Cartographers, 37 (2). 53-55. Earth Sciences Data and Information Publication - Article NonPeerReviewed 2003 ftnerc 2023-02-04T19:28:09Z Placenames in Antarctica are uniquely complex. Antarctica’s distinctive political environment results in a situation where many national bodies confer names, but until recently there has been no coordination of this activity. The consequence of this is that many features are multiply named. The poor state of topographic mapping of the continent means that the majority of placenames are only defined by point locations, and in many cases the point location is based on old or inadequate mapping. In 1994 an Italian team started work on the Composite Gazetteer of Antarctica (CGA) on behalf of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR). The first version was presented to SCAR in 1998 and is now the premier source of placename information for Antarctica. This work still continues, and will continue for the foreseeable future as errors are corrected and new content – in particular new descriptions – are provided by national bodies. The present database includes all names currently in official use in Antarctica. Unfortunately, the only geometry provided with the CGA is a point location for each feature, and this is unlikely to change for many reasons. This paper describes how an explicit hierarchical structuring of placenames can provide a geographic structure, and how this structure can assist name selection and placement. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica SCAR Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftnerc
language unknown
topic Earth Sciences
Data and Information
spellingShingle Earth Sciences
Data and Information
Cooper, A. Paul R.
Fretwell, Peter
A placename geography for Antarctica
topic_facet Earth Sciences
Data and Information
description Placenames in Antarctica are uniquely complex. Antarctica’s distinctive political environment results in a situation where many national bodies confer names, but until recently there has been no coordination of this activity. The consequence of this is that many features are multiply named. The poor state of topographic mapping of the continent means that the majority of placenames are only defined by point locations, and in many cases the point location is based on old or inadequate mapping. In 1994 an Italian team started work on the Composite Gazetteer of Antarctica (CGA) on behalf of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR). The first version was presented to SCAR in 1998 and is now the premier source of placename information for Antarctica. This work still continues, and will continue for the foreseeable future as errors are corrected and new content – in particular new descriptions – are provided by national bodies. The present database includes all names currently in official use in Antarctica. Unfortunately, the only geometry provided with the CGA is a point location for each feature, and this is unlikely to change for many reasons. This paper describes how an explicit hierarchical structuring of placenames can provide a geographic structure, and how this structure can assist name selection and placement.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cooper, A. Paul R.
Fretwell, Peter
author_facet Cooper, A. Paul R.
Fretwell, Peter
author_sort Cooper, A. Paul R.
title A placename geography for Antarctica
title_short A placename geography for Antarctica
title_full A placename geography for Antarctica
title_fullStr A placename geography for Antarctica
title_full_unstemmed A placename geography for Antarctica
title_sort placename geography for antarctica
publisher Society of Cartographers
publishDate 2003
url http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/12727/
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
SCAR
Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
SCAR
Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research
op_relation Cooper, A. Paul R.; Fretwell, Peter orcid:0000-0002-1988-5844 . 2003 A placename geography for Antarctica. Bulletin of the Society of Cartographers, 37 (2). 53-55.
_version_ 1766215219362660352