Zooplankton communities of the lena river delta (Siberia, Russia)

© SGEM2016.The article represents the current status of zooplankton communities in different types of water bodies of the Lena River Delta (The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)), Eastern Siberia, Russia. Zooplankton species compositions have been investigated in each of thermokarst and polygonal lakes of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nigamatzyanova G., Frolova L.
Format: Conference Object
Language:unknown
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://openrepository.ru/article?id=183632
id ftneicon:oai:rour.neicon.ru:rour/183632
record_format openpolar
spelling ftneicon:oai:rour.neicon.ru:rour/183632 2023-05-15T15:06:58+02:00 Zooplankton communities of the lena river delta (Siberia, Russia) Nigamatzyanova G. Frolova L. 2016 https://openrepository.ru/article?id=183632 unknown International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM 2 643 http://rour.neicon.ru:80/xmlui/bitstream/rour/183632/1/nora.pdf 1314-2704 https://openrepository.ru/article?id=183632 SCOPUS13142704-2016-2-SID84994174599 Arctic Hydrobiology Permafrost Water assessment Zooplankton Conference Paper 2016 ftneicon 2020-07-21T12:01:51Z © SGEM2016.The article represents the current status of zooplankton communities in different types of water bodies of the Lena River Delta (The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)), Eastern Siberia, Russia. Zooplankton species compositions have been investigated in each of thermokarst and polygonal lakes of the areas of study. The diversity of zooplankton species was clearly dominated by representatives of the type of Rotifera. On the other hand, Cladocera and Copepoda species were represented approximately in equal proportions. The abundance of Rotifera was higher in zooplankton communities. The zooplankton abundance was determined by rotifers, the biomass – by Copepods. The main species complex consisted of Kellicottia longispina, Keratella cochlearis, Conochilus unicornis, Eudiaptomus graciloides, Cyclopos genera and juvenile cladocerans. The reservoirs were characterized as clean or moderately polluted and oligosaprobic with deviation in β-mezosaprobic zone. The communities were dominated by widespread zooplankton species where Holarctic and Palearctic organisms were presented approximately in equal proportions. According to biotopic distribution eurytopic species represent half of all the specific composition, planktonic and littoral species we re presented in equal proportions. Zooplankton communities in thermokar st lakes we re more similar to themselves than the thermokarst and polygonal waterbodies’ zooplankton communities. There wa s clearly seasonality in dominance of zooplankton species and their association with a type of the water body. Conference Object Arctic lena river permafrost Republic of Sakha Sakha Thermokarst Yakutia Zooplankton Copepods Siberia NORA (National aggregator of open repositories of Russian universities) Arctic Sakha
institution Open Polar
collection NORA (National aggregator of open repositories of Russian universities)
op_collection_id ftneicon
language unknown
topic Arctic
Hydrobiology
Permafrost
Water assessment
Zooplankton
spellingShingle Arctic
Hydrobiology
Permafrost
Water assessment
Zooplankton
Nigamatzyanova G.
Frolova L.
Zooplankton communities of the lena river delta (Siberia, Russia)
topic_facet Arctic
Hydrobiology
Permafrost
Water assessment
Zooplankton
description © SGEM2016.The article represents the current status of zooplankton communities in different types of water bodies of the Lena River Delta (The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)), Eastern Siberia, Russia. Zooplankton species compositions have been investigated in each of thermokarst and polygonal lakes of the areas of study. The diversity of zooplankton species was clearly dominated by representatives of the type of Rotifera. On the other hand, Cladocera and Copepoda species were represented approximately in equal proportions. The abundance of Rotifera was higher in zooplankton communities. The zooplankton abundance was determined by rotifers, the biomass – by Copepods. The main species complex consisted of Kellicottia longispina, Keratella cochlearis, Conochilus unicornis, Eudiaptomus graciloides, Cyclopos genera and juvenile cladocerans. The reservoirs were characterized as clean or moderately polluted and oligosaprobic with deviation in β-mezosaprobic zone. The communities were dominated by widespread zooplankton species where Holarctic and Palearctic organisms were presented approximately in equal proportions. According to biotopic distribution eurytopic species represent half of all the specific composition, planktonic and littoral species we re presented in equal proportions. Zooplankton communities in thermokar st lakes we re more similar to themselves than the thermokarst and polygonal waterbodies’ zooplankton communities. There wa s clearly seasonality in dominance of zooplankton species and their association with a type of the water body.
format Conference Object
author Nigamatzyanova G.
Frolova L.
author_facet Nigamatzyanova G.
Frolova L.
author_sort Nigamatzyanova G.
title Zooplankton communities of the lena river delta (Siberia, Russia)
title_short Zooplankton communities of the lena river delta (Siberia, Russia)
title_full Zooplankton communities of the lena river delta (Siberia, Russia)
title_fullStr Zooplankton communities of the lena river delta (Siberia, Russia)
title_full_unstemmed Zooplankton communities of the lena river delta (Siberia, Russia)
title_sort zooplankton communities of the lena river delta (siberia, russia)
publishDate 2016
url https://openrepository.ru/article?id=183632
geographic Arctic
Sakha
geographic_facet Arctic
Sakha
genre Arctic
lena river
permafrost
Republic of Sakha
Sakha
Thermokarst
Yakutia
Zooplankton
Copepods
Siberia
genre_facet Arctic
lena river
permafrost
Republic of Sakha
Sakha
Thermokarst
Yakutia
Zooplankton
Copepods
Siberia
op_source SCOPUS13142704-2016-2-SID84994174599
op_relation International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM
2
643
http://rour.neicon.ru:80/xmlui/bitstream/rour/183632/1/nora.pdf
1314-2704
https://openrepository.ru/article?id=183632
_version_ 1766338544837591040