Observed structure, evolution, and potential intensity of category 5 Hurricane Isabel (2003) from 12 to 14 September

• Published in: Monthly Weather Review
• Other Authors: Bell, Michael (author), Montgomery, Michael (author)
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: American Meteorological Society 2008
• Subjects: North Atlantic Ocean; Observational data; North Atlantic
• Online Access: http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-003-102; https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR1858.1

Unprecedented observations of Hurricane Isabel (2003) at category 5 intensity were collected from 12 to 14 September. This study presents a detailed analysis of the inner-core structure, atmospheric boundary layer, sea surface temperature, and outflow layer of a superintense tropical cyclone using high-resolution in situ flight-level, NCAR GPS dropwindsonde, Doppler radar, and satellite measurements. The analysis of the dropwindsonde and in situ data includes a comprehensive discussion of the uncertainties associated with this observational dataset and provides an estimate of the storm-relative axisymmetric inner-core structure using Barnes objective analysis. An assessment of gradient and thermal wind balance in the inner core is also presented. The axisymmetric data composites presented in this study suggest that Isabel built a reservoir of high moist entropy air by sea-to-air latent heat flux inside the low-level eye that was utilized as an additional energy source to nearly maintain its extreme intensity even after crossing the cool wake of Hurricane Fabian. It is argued here that the combined mean and asymmetric eddy flux of high moist entropy air from the low-level eye into the eyewall represents an additional power source or ?turbo boost? to the hurricane heat engine. Recent estimates of the ratio of sea-to-air enthalpy and momentum exchange at high wind speeds are used to suggest that Isabel utilized this extra power to exceed the previously assumed intensity upper bound for the given environmental conditions on all three days. This discrepancy between a priori potential intensity theory and observations may be as high as 35 m s?? on 13 September.