Overestimated eddy kinetic energy in the eddy‐rich regions simulated by eddy-resolving global ocean–sea ice models

The performance of eddy-resolving global ocean-sea ice models in simulating mesoscale eddies is evaluated using six eddy-resolving experiments forced by different atmospheric reanalysis products. Interestingly, eddy-resolving ocean general circulation models (OGCMs) tend to simulate more (less) ener...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Other Authors: Ding, Mengrong (author), Liu, Hailong (author), Lin, Pengfei (author), Hu, Aixue (author), Meng, Yao (author), Li, Yiwen (author), Liu, Kexiu (author)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098370
id ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_25481
record_format openpolar
spelling ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_25481 2024-04-14T08:03:52+00:00 Overestimated eddy kinetic energy in the eddy‐rich regions simulated by eddy-resolving global ocean–sea ice models Ding, Mengrong (author) Liu, Hailong (author) Lin, Pengfei (author) Hu, Aixue (author) Meng, Yao (author) Li, Yiwen (author) Liu, Kexiu (author) 2022-06-16 https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098370 en eng Geophysical Research Letters--Geophysical Research Letters--0094-8276--1944-8007 Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean-sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)--10.5281/zenodo.3934822 articles:25481 doi:10.1029/2022GL098370 ark:/85065/d74q7zq8 Copyright 2022 American Geophysical Union article Text 2022 ftncar https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098370 2024-03-21T18:00:26Z The performance of eddy-resolving global ocean-sea ice models in simulating mesoscale eddies is evaluated using six eddy-resolving experiments forced by different atmospheric reanalysis products. Interestingly, eddy-resolving ocean general circulation models (OGCMs) tend to simulate more (less) energetic eddy-rich (eddy-poor) regions with a smaller (larger) spatial extent than satellite observation, which finally shows that larger (smaller) mesoscale energy intensity (EI) is simulated in the eddy-rich (eddy-poor) regions. Quantitatively, there is an approximately 27%-60% overestimation of EI in the eddy-rich regions, which are mainly located in the Kuroshio-Oyashio Extension, the Gulf Stream, and the Antarctic Circumpolar Currents regions, although the global mean EI is underestimated by 25%-45%. Apparently, the eddy kinetic energy in the eddy-poor region is underestimated. Further analyses based on coherent mesoscale eddy properties show that the overestimation in the eddy-rich regions is mainly attributed to mesoscale eddies' intensity and is more prominent when mesoscale eddies are in their growth stage. 1852977 1947282 DE-SC0022070 Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Sea ice OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research) Antarctic Oyashio ENVELOPE(157.000,157.000,50.000,50.000) The Antarctic Geophysical Research Letters 49 11
institution Open Polar
collection OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research)
op_collection_id ftncar
language English
description The performance of eddy-resolving global ocean-sea ice models in simulating mesoscale eddies is evaluated using six eddy-resolving experiments forced by different atmospheric reanalysis products. Interestingly, eddy-resolving ocean general circulation models (OGCMs) tend to simulate more (less) energetic eddy-rich (eddy-poor) regions with a smaller (larger) spatial extent than satellite observation, which finally shows that larger (smaller) mesoscale energy intensity (EI) is simulated in the eddy-rich (eddy-poor) regions. Quantitatively, there is an approximately 27%-60% overestimation of EI in the eddy-rich regions, which are mainly located in the Kuroshio-Oyashio Extension, the Gulf Stream, and the Antarctic Circumpolar Currents regions, although the global mean EI is underestimated by 25%-45%. Apparently, the eddy kinetic energy in the eddy-poor region is underestimated. Further analyses based on coherent mesoscale eddy properties show that the overestimation in the eddy-rich regions is mainly attributed to mesoscale eddies' intensity and is more prominent when mesoscale eddies are in their growth stage. 1852977 1947282 DE-SC0022070
author2 Ding, Mengrong (author)
Liu, Hailong (author)
Lin, Pengfei (author)
Hu, Aixue (author)
Meng, Yao (author)
Li, Yiwen (author)
Liu, Kexiu (author)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
title Overestimated eddy kinetic energy in the eddy‐rich regions simulated by eddy-resolving global ocean–sea ice models
spellingShingle Overestimated eddy kinetic energy in the eddy‐rich regions simulated by eddy-resolving global ocean–sea ice models
title_short Overestimated eddy kinetic energy in the eddy‐rich regions simulated by eddy-resolving global ocean–sea ice models
title_full Overestimated eddy kinetic energy in the eddy‐rich regions simulated by eddy-resolving global ocean–sea ice models
title_fullStr Overestimated eddy kinetic energy in the eddy‐rich regions simulated by eddy-resolving global ocean–sea ice models
title_full_unstemmed Overestimated eddy kinetic energy in the eddy‐rich regions simulated by eddy-resolving global ocean–sea ice models
title_sort overestimated eddy kinetic energy in the eddy‐rich regions simulated by eddy-resolving global ocean–sea ice models
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098370
long_lat ENVELOPE(157.000,157.000,50.000,50.000)
geographic Antarctic
Oyashio
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Oyashio
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Sea ice
op_relation Geophysical Research Letters--Geophysical Research Letters--0094-8276--1944-8007
Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean-sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)--10.5281/zenodo.3934822
articles:25481
doi:10.1029/2022GL098370
ark:/85065/d74q7zq8
op_rights Copyright 2022 American Geophysical Union
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098370
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 49
container_issue 11
_version_ 1796300182319529984