Was the 2015 North Atlantic subpolar cold anomaly predictable?

The subpolar North Atlantic (SPNA) experienced extreme cold during 2015, an event often called the "cold blob." The evolution of this event in the Community Earth System Model version 1 Decadal Prediction Large Ensemble (CESM1-DPLE) hindcast initialized in November 2014 is compared to obse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Climate
Other Authors: Maroon, Elizabeth A. (author), Yeager, Stephen G. (author), Danabasoglu, Gokhan (author), Rosenbloom, Nan (author)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0750.1
id ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_25277
record_format openpolar
spelling ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_25277 2024-04-14T08:15:32+00:00 Was the 2015 North Atlantic subpolar cold anomaly predictable? Maroon, Elizabeth A. (author) Yeager, Stephen G. (author) Danabasoglu, Gokhan (author) Rosenbloom, Nan (author) 2021-07 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0750.1 en eng Journal of Climate--0894-8755--1520-0442 CESM1 2015 Cold Blob Sensitivity Experiments--10.5281/zenodo.4050559 NOAA Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature (ERSST), Version 5--10.7289/V5T72FNM articles:25277 doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0750.1 ark:/85065/d7jw8jhf Copyright author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. article Text 2021 ftncar https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0750.1 2024-03-21T18:00:26Z The subpolar North Atlantic (SPNA) experienced extreme cold during 2015, an event often called the "cold blob." The evolution of this event in the Community Earth System Model version 1 Decadal Prediction Large Ensemble (CESM1-DPLE) hindcast initialized in November 2014 is compared to observations. This CESM1-DPLE hindcast failed to predict cold conditions during 2015 despite already cold SPNA initial conditions and despite having high sea surface temperature skill in the SPNA in all other years. The goal of this paper is to understand what led to this prediction failure in order to provide insight for future decadal prediction efforts. Our analysis shows that strongly positive North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) conditions during winter and spring 2015 likely sustained the cold blob but were not simulated in any CESM1-DPLE members. We examine the rarity of the 2015 event using the CESM1-DPLE's uninitialized counterpart, the CESM1 Large Ensemble (CESM1-LE). Results from the CESM1-LE indicate that the exceptional state of the observed NAO in the winter of 2015 is at least part of the explanation for why this event was not encompassed in the CESM1-DPLE spread. To test another possibility-namely, that deficiencies in the initial conditions degraded the prediction-we performed additional hindcasts using the CESM1-DPLE protocol but different initial conditions. Altering the initial conditions did not improve the simulation of the 2015 cold blob, and in some cases, degraded it. Given the difficulty of predicting this event, this case could be a useful test bed for future prediction system development. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research) Blob The ENVELOPE(-124.933,-124.933,-73.400,-73.400) Journal of Climate 1 69
institution Open Polar
collection OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research)
op_collection_id ftncar
language English
description The subpolar North Atlantic (SPNA) experienced extreme cold during 2015, an event often called the "cold blob." The evolution of this event in the Community Earth System Model version 1 Decadal Prediction Large Ensemble (CESM1-DPLE) hindcast initialized in November 2014 is compared to observations. This CESM1-DPLE hindcast failed to predict cold conditions during 2015 despite already cold SPNA initial conditions and despite having high sea surface temperature skill in the SPNA in all other years. The goal of this paper is to understand what led to this prediction failure in order to provide insight for future decadal prediction efforts. Our analysis shows that strongly positive North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) conditions during winter and spring 2015 likely sustained the cold blob but were not simulated in any CESM1-DPLE members. We examine the rarity of the 2015 event using the CESM1-DPLE's uninitialized counterpart, the CESM1 Large Ensemble (CESM1-LE). Results from the CESM1-LE indicate that the exceptional state of the observed NAO in the winter of 2015 is at least part of the explanation for why this event was not encompassed in the CESM1-DPLE spread. To test another possibility-namely, that deficiencies in the initial conditions degraded the prediction-we performed additional hindcasts using the CESM1-DPLE protocol but different initial conditions. Altering the initial conditions did not improve the simulation of the 2015 cold blob, and in some cases, degraded it. Given the difficulty of predicting this event, this case could be a useful test bed for future prediction system development.
author2 Maroon, Elizabeth A. (author)
Yeager, Stephen G. (author)
Danabasoglu, Gokhan (author)
Rosenbloom, Nan (author)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
title Was the 2015 North Atlantic subpolar cold anomaly predictable?
spellingShingle Was the 2015 North Atlantic subpolar cold anomaly predictable?
title_short Was the 2015 North Atlantic subpolar cold anomaly predictable?
title_full Was the 2015 North Atlantic subpolar cold anomaly predictable?
title_fullStr Was the 2015 North Atlantic subpolar cold anomaly predictable?
title_full_unstemmed Was the 2015 North Atlantic subpolar cold anomaly predictable?
title_sort was the 2015 north atlantic subpolar cold anomaly predictable?
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0750.1
long_lat ENVELOPE(-124.933,-124.933,-73.400,-73.400)
geographic Blob The
geographic_facet Blob The
genre North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
genre_facet North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
op_relation Journal of Climate--0894-8755--1520-0442
CESM1 2015 Cold Blob Sensitivity Experiments--10.5281/zenodo.4050559
NOAA Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature (ERSST), Version 5--10.7289/V5T72FNM
articles:25277
doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0750.1
ark:/85065/d7jw8jhf
op_rights Copyright author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0750.1
container_title Journal of Climate
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 69
_version_ 1796313903782690816