Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies

We explore the impact of different stratospheric sulfur injection strategies to counter greenhouse gas induced warming on total column ozone (TCO), including high and low altitude injections at four latitudes, equatorial injections, and using a configuration with higher vertical resolution, based on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Other Authors: Tilmes, Simone (author), Richter, Jadwiga H. (author), Kravitz, B. (author), MacMartin, D. G. (author), Glanville, Anne S. (author), Visioni, D. (author), Kinnison, Douglas E. (author), Müller, R. (author)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094058
id ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_24786
record_format openpolar
spelling ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_24786 2024-04-28T08:01:33+00:00 Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies Tilmes, Simone (author) Richter, Jadwiga H. (author) Kravitz, B. (author) MacMartin, D. G. (author) Glanville, Anne S. (author) Visioni, D. (author) Kinnison, Douglas E. (author) Müller, R. (author) 2021-10-16 https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094058 en eng Geophysical Research Letters--Geophys Res Lett--0094-8276--1944-8007 articles:24786 doi:10.1029/2021GL094058 ark:/85065/d7j67mdn Copyright 2021 American Geophysical Union. article Text 2021 ftncar https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094058 2024-04-04T17:32:42Z We explore the impact of different stratospheric sulfur injection strategies to counter greenhouse gas induced warming on total column ozone (TCO), including high and low altitude injections at four latitudes, equatorial injections, and using a configuration with higher vertical resolution, based on a state-of-the-art Earth system model. The experiments maintain global surface temperatures at 2020 conditions, while following the unmitigated future scenario. Within the first 10 years of the injection, we find an abrupt deepening of the Antarctic ozone hole by 8%-20% and changes up to +/- 5% for other regions and seasons. The ozone hole recovery is delayed by similar to 25 to over 55 years, with the fastest recovery for low-altitude injections and slowest for equatorial injections. Mid to high-latitude TCO increases by similar to 15% in Northern Hemisphere winter and spring between 2010-2019 and 2080-2089 due to both increasing greenhouse gases and increasing sulfur injections. Implications for ecosystems need to be investigated. 1852977 Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research) Geophysical Research Letters 48 19
institution Open Polar
collection OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research)
op_collection_id ftncar
language English
description We explore the impact of different stratospheric sulfur injection strategies to counter greenhouse gas induced warming on total column ozone (TCO), including high and low altitude injections at four latitudes, equatorial injections, and using a configuration with higher vertical resolution, based on a state-of-the-art Earth system model. The experiments maintain global surface temperatures at 2020 conditions, while following the unmitigated future scenario. Within the first 10 years of the injection, we find an abrupt deepening of the Antarctic ozone hole by 8%-20% and changes up to +/- 5% for other regions and seasons. The ozone hole recovery is delayed by similar to 25 to over 55 years, with the fastest recovery for low-altitude injections and slowest for equatorial injections. Mid to high-latitude TCO increases by similar to 15% in Northern Hemisphere winter and spring between 2010-2019 and 2080-2089 due to both increasing greenhouse gases and increasing sulfur injections. Implications for ecosystems need to be investigated. 1852977
author2 Tilmes, Simone (author)
Richter, Jadwiga H. (author)
Kravitz, B. (author)
MacMartin, D. G. (author)
Glanville, Anne S. (author)
Visioni, D. (author)
Kinnison, Douglas E. (author)
Müller, R. (author)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
title Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies
spellingShingle Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies
title_short Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies
title_full Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies
title_fullStr Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies
title_sort sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094058
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_relation Geophysical Research Letters--Geophys Res Lett--0094-8276--1944-8007
articles:24786
doi:10.1029/2021GL094058
ark:/85065/d7j67mdn
op_rights Copyright 2021 American Geophysical Union.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094058
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 48
container_issue 19
_version_ 1797573245667377152