An Arctic ozone hole in 2020 if not for the Montreal Protocol

Without the Montreal Protocol, the already extreme Arctic ozone losses in the boreal spring of 2020 would be expected to have produced an Antarctic-like ozone hole, based upon simulations performed using the specified dynamics version of the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (SD-WACCM) and us...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Other Authors: Wilka, Catherine (author), Solomon, Susan (author), Kinneson, Douglas (author), Tarasick, David (author)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15771-2021
_version_ 1821771884722651136
author2 Wilka, Catherine (author)
Solomon, Susan (author)
Kinneson, Douglas (author)
Tarasick, David (author)
collection OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research)
container_issue 20
container_start_page 15771
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 21
description Without the Montreal Protocol, the already extreme Arctic ozone losses in the boreal spring of 2020 would be expected to have produced an Antarctic-like ozone hole, based upon simulations performed using the specified dynamics version of the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (SD-WACCM) and using an alternate emission scenario of 3.5 % growth in ozone-depleting substances from 1985 onwards. In particular, we find that the area of total ozone below 220 DU (Dobson units), a standard metric of Antarctic ozone hole size, would have covered about 20 million km2. Record observed local lows of 0.1 ppmv (parts per million by volume) at some altitudes in the lower stratosphere seen by ozonesondes in March 2020 would have reached 0.01, again similar to the Antarctic. Spring ozone depletion would have begun earlier and lasted longer without the Montreal Protocol, and by 2020, the year-round ozone depletion would have begun to dramatically diverge from the observed case. This extreme year also provides an opportunity to test parameterizations of polar stratospheric cloud impacts on denitrification and, thereby, to improve stratospheric models of both the real world and alternate scenarios. In particular, we find that decreasing the parameterized nitric acid trihydrate number density in SD-WACCM, which subsequently increases denitrification, improves the agreement with observations for both nitric acid and ozone. This study reinforces that the historically extreme 2020 Arctic ozone depletion is not cause for concern over the Montreal Protocol's effectiveness but rather demonstrates that the Montreal Protocol indeed merits celebration for avoiding an Arctic ozone hole. 80NSSC19K0952
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
geographic Arctic
Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Arctic
Antarctic
The Antarctic
id ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_24782
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftncar
op_container_end_page 15781
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15771-2021
op_relation Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
MLS/Aura Level 2 Nitric Acid (HNO3) Mixing Ratio V005--10.5067/Aura/MLS/DATA2511
OMI/Aura TOMS-Like Ozone and Radiative Cloud Fraction Daily L3 Global 0.25x0.25 deg--10.5067/Aura/OMI/DATA3002
articles:24782
ark:/85065/d7280c2z
doi:10.5194/acp-21-15771-2021
op_rights Copyright author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
publishDate 2021
record_format openpolar
spelling ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_24782 2025-01-16T19:38:39+00:00 An Arctic ozone hole in 2020 if not for the Montreal Protocol Wilka, Catherine (author) Solomon, Susan (author) Kinneson, Douglas (author) Tarasick, David (author) 2021-10-22 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15771-2021 en eng Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics MLS/Aura Level 2 Nitric Acid (HNO3) Mixing Ratio V005--10.5067/Aura/MLS/DATA2511 OMI/Aura TOMS-Like Ozone and Radiative Cloud Fraction Daily L3 Global 0.25x0.25 deg--10.5067/Aura/OMI/DATA3002 articles:24782 ark:/85065/d7280c2z doi:10.5194/acp-21-15771-2021 Copyright author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. article Text 2021 ftncar https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15771-2021 2024-03-21T18:00:26Z Without the Montreal Protocol, the already extreme Arctic ozone losses in the boreal spring of 2020 would be expected to have produced an Antarctic-like ozone hole, based upon simulations performed using the specified dynamics version of the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (SD-WACCM) and using an alternate emission scenario of 3.5 % growth in ozone-depleting substances from 1985 onwards. In particular, we find that the area of total ozone below 220 DU (Dobson units), a standard metric of Antarctic ozone hole size, would have covered about 20 million km2. Record observed local lows of 0.1 ppmv (parts per million by volume) at some altitudes in the lower stratosphere seen by ozonesondes in March 2020 would have reached 0.01, again similar to the Antarctic. Spring ozone depletion would have begun earlier and lasted longer without the Montreal Protocol, and by 2020, the year-round ozone depletion would have begun to dramatically diverge from the observed case. This extreme year also provides an opportunity to test parameterizations of polar stratospheric cloud impacts on denitrification and, thereby, to improve stratospheric models of both the real world and alternate scenarios. In particular, we find that decreasing the parameterized nitric acid trihydrate number density in SD-WACCM, which subsequently increases denitrification, improves the agreement with observations for both nitric acid and ozone. This study reinforces that the historically extreme 2020 Arctic ozone depletion is not cause for concern over the Montreal Protocol's effectiveness but rather demonstrates that the Montreal Protocol indeed merits celebration for avoiding an Arctic ozone hole. 80NSSC19K0952 Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Arctic OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research) Arctic Antarctic The Antarctic Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 21 20 15771 15781
spellingShingle An Arctic ozone hole in 2020 if not for the Montreal Protocol
title An Arctic ozone hole in 2020 if not for the Montreal Protocol
title_full An Arctic ozone hole in 2020 if not for the Montreal Protocol
title_fullStr An Arctic ozone hole in 2020 if not for the Montreal Protocol
title_full_unstemmed An Arctic ozone hole in 2020 if not for the Montreal Protocol
title_short An Arctic ozone hole in 2020 if not for the Montreal Protocol
title_sort arctic ozone hole in 2020 if not for the montreal protocol
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15771-2021