Impact of Ural blocking on winter warm Arctic--cold Eurasian anomalies. Part I: Blocking-induced amplification

In Part I of this study, the impact of Ural blocking (UB) on the warm Arctic–cold Eurasian (WACE) pattern associated with the winter (DJF) arctic sea ice loss during 1979-2013 is examined by dividing the arctic sea ice reduction region into two dominant subregions: the Barents and Kara Seas (BKS) an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Climate
Other Authors: Luo, Dehai (author), Xiao, Yiqing (author), Yao, Yao (author), Dai, Aiguo (author), Simmonds, Ian (author), Franzke, Christian (author)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Meteorological Society 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-022-909
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0611.1
id ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_18461
record_format openpolar
spelling ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_18461 2023-09-05T13:16:30+02:00 Impact of Ural blocking on winter warm Arctic--cold Eurasian anomalies. Part I: Blocking-induced amplification Luo, Dehai (author) Xiao, Yiqing (author) Yao, Yao (author) Dai, Aiguo (author) Simmonds, Ian (author) Franzke, Christian (author) 2016-06-01 application/pdf http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-022-909 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0611.1 en eng American Meteorological Society Journal of Climate articles:18461 ark:/85065/d7g162d9 http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-022-909 doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0611.1 Copyright 2016 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 USC, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the Society's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statements, requires written permission or license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policies, available from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or amspubs@ametsoc.org. Permission to place a copy of this work on this server has been provided by the AMS. The AMS does not guarantee that the copy provided here is an accurate copy of the published work. Text article 2016 ftncar https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0611.1 2023-08-14T18:43:32Z In Part I of this study, the impact of Ural blocking (UB) on the warm Arctic–cold Eurasian (WACE) pattern associated with the winter (DJF) arctic sea ice loss during 1979-2013 is examined by dividing the arctic sea ice reduction region into two dominant subregions: the Barents and Kara Seas (BKS) and the North American high-latitude (NAH) region (Baffin and Hudson Bay, Davis Strait, and Labrador Sea). It is found that atmospheric response to arctic sea ice loss resembles a negative Arctic response oscillation with a dominant positive height anomaly over the Eurasian subarctic region. Regression analyses of the two subregions further show that the sea ice loss over the BKS corresponds to the UB pattern together with a positive North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO+) and is followed by a WACE anomaly, while the sea ice reduction in the NAH region corresponds to a negative NAO (NAO−) pattern with a cold anomaly over northern Eurasia. Further analyses reveal that the UB pattern is more persistent during the period 2000-13 (P2) than 1979-99 (P1) because of the reduced middle-to-high-latitude mean westerly winds over Eurasia associated with the intense BKS warming. During P2 the establishment of the UB becomes a slow process because of the role of the BKS warming, while its decay is slightly rapid. In the presence of the long-lived UB that often occurs with the NAO+, the BKS-warming-induced DJF-mean anticyclonic anomaly is intensified and widened and then expands southward during P2 to amplify the WACE pattern and induce the southward displacement of its cold anomaly and the further loss of the BKS sea ice. Thus, midlatitude Eurasian cold events should be more frequent as the sea ice loss continues over the BKS. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Baffin Davis Strait Hudson Bay Labrador Sea North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation Sea ice Subarctic OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research) Arctic Hudson Hudson Bay Journal of Climate 29 11 3925 3947
institution Open Polar
collection OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research)
op_collection_id ftncar
language English
description In Part I of this study, the impact of Ural blocking (UB) on the warm Arctic–cold Eurasian (WACE) pattern associated with the winter (DJF) arctic sea ice loss during 1979-2013 is examined by dividing the arctic sea ice reduction region into two dominant subregions: the Barents and Kara Seas (BKS) and the North American high-latitude (NAH) region (Baffin and Hudson Bay, Davis Strait, and Labrador Sea). It is found that atmospheric response to arctic sea ice loss resembles a negative Arctic response oscillation with a dominant positive height anomaly over the Eurasian subarctic region. Regression analyses of the two subregions further show that the sea ice loss over the BKS corresponds to the UB pattern together with a positive North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO+) and is followed by a WACE anomaly, while the sea ice reduction in the NAH region corresponds to a negative NAO (NAO−) pattern with a cold anomaly over northern Eurasia. Further analyses reveal that the UB pattern is more persistent during the period 2000-13 (P2) than 1979-99 (P1) because of the reduced middle-to-high-latitude mean westerly winds over Eurasia associated with the intense BKS warming. During P2 the establishment of the UB becomes a slow process because of the role of the BKS warming, while its decay is slightly rapid. In the presence of the long-lived UB that often occurs with the NAO+, the BKS-warming-induced DJF-mean anticyclonic anomaly is intensified and widened and then expands southward during P2 to amplify the WACE pattern and induce the southward displacement of its cold anomaly and the further loss of the BKS sea ice. Thus, midlatitude Eurasian cold events should be more frequent as the sea ice loss continues over the BKS.
author2 Luo, Dehai (author)
Xiao, Yiqing (author)
Yao, Yao (author)
Dai, Aiguo (author)
Simmonds, Ian (author)
Franzke, Christian (author)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
title Impact of Ural blocking on winter warm Arctic--cold Eurasian anomalies. Part I: Blocking-induced amplification
spellingShingle Impact of Ural blocking on winter warm Arctic--cold Eurasian anomalies. Part I: Blocking-induced amplification
title_short Impact of Ural blocking on winter warm Arctic--cold Eurasian anomalies. Part I: Blocking-induced amplification
title_full Impact of Ural blocking on winter warm Arctic--cold Eurasian anomalies. Part I: Blocking-induced amplification
title_fullStr Impact of Ural blocking on winter warm Arctic--cold Eurasian anomalies. Part I: Blocking-induced amplification
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Ural blocking on winter warm Arctic--cold Eurasian anomalies. Part I: Blocking-induced amplification
title_sort impact of ural blocking on winter warm arctic--cold eurasian anomalies. part i: blocking-induced amplification
publisher American Meteorological Society
publishDate 2016
url http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-022-909
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0611.1
geographic Arctic
Hudson
Hudson Bay
geographic_facet Arctic
Hudson
Hudson Bay
genre Arctic
Baffin
Davis Strait
Hudson Bay
Labrador Sea
North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
Sea ice
Subarctic
genre_facet Arctic
Baffin
Davis Strait
Hudson Bay
Labrador Sea
North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
Sea ice
Subarctic
op_relation Journal of Climate
articles:18461
ark:/85065/d7g162d9
http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-022-909
doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0611.1
op_rights Copyright 2016 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 USC, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the Society's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statements, requires written permission or license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policies, available from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or amspubs@ametsoc.org. Permission to place a copy of this work on this server has been provided by the AMS. The AMS does not guarantee that the copy provided here is an accurate copy of the published work.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0611.1
container_title Journal of Climate
container_volume 29
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3925
op_container_end_page 3947
_version_ 1776198054204932096