Sensitivity to glacial forcing in the CCSM4

Results are presented from the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4), simulation of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) at the standard 1° resolution, the same resolution as the majority of the CCSM4 CMIP5 long-term simulations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Climate
Other Authors: Brady, Esther (author), Otto-Bliesner, Bette (author), Kay, Jennifer (author), Rosenbloom, Nan (author)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Meteorological Society 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-015-454
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00416.1
id ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_12492
record_format openpolar
spelling ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_12492 2023-09-05T13:13:22+02:00 Sensitivity to glacial forcing in the CCSM4 Brady, Esther (author) Otto-Bliesner, Bette (author) Kay, Jennifer (author) Rosenbloom, Nan (author) 2013-03-01 application/pdf http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-015-454 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00416.1 en eng American Meteorological Society Journal of Climate http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-015-454 doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00416.1 ark:/85065/d79g5nn1 Copyright 2013 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 USC, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the Society's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statements, requires written permission or license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policies, available from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or amspubs@ametsoc.org. Permission to place a copy of this work on this server has been provided by the AMS. The AMS does not guarantee that the copy provided here is an accurate copy of the published work. Text article 2013 ftncar https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00416.1 2023-08-14T18:39:45Z Results are presented from the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4), simulation of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) at the standard 1° resolution, the same resolution as the majority of the CCSM4 CMIP5 long-term simulations for the historical and future projection scenarios. The forcings and boundary conditions for this simulation follow the protocols of the Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project, version 3 (PMIP3). Two additional CCSM4 CO₂ sensitivity simulations, in which the concentrations are abruptly changed at the start of the simulation to the low 185 ppm LGM concentrations (LGMCO₂) and to a quadrupling of the preindustrial concentration (4×CO₂), are also analyzed. For the full LGM simulation, the estimated equilibrium cooling of the global mean annual surface temperature is 5.5°C with an estimated radiative forcing of -6.2 W m⁻². The radiative forcing includes the effects of the reduced LGM greenhouse gases, ice sheets, continental distribution with sea level lowered by approximately 120 m from the present, and orbital parameters, but not changes to atmospheric aerosols or vegetation biogeography. The LGM simulation has an equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) of 3.1(±0.3)°C, comparable to the CCSM4 4×CO₂ result. The LGMCO₂ simulation shows a greater ECS of 4.2°C. Other responses found at the LGM in CCSM4 include a global precipitation rate decrease at a rate of ~2% °C−1, similar to climate change simulations in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC AR4); a strengthening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) with a shoaling of North Atlantic Deep Water and a filling of the deep basin up to sill depth with Antarctic Bottom Water; and an enhanced seasonal cycle accompanied by reduced ENSO variability in the eastern Pacific Ocean’s SSTs. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic North Atlantic Deep Water North Atlantic OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research) Antarctic Pacific Journal of Climate 26 6 1901 1925
institution Open Polar
collection OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research)
op_collection_id ftncar
language English
description Results are presented from the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4), simulation of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) at the standard 1° resolution, the same resolution as the majority of the CCSM4 CMIP5 long-term simulations for the historical and future projection scenarios. The forcings and boundary conditions for this simulation follow the protocols of the Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project, version 3 (PMIP3). Two additional CCSM4 CO₂ sensitivity simulations, in which the concentrations are abruptly changed at the start of the simulation to the low 185 ppm LGM concentrations (LGMCO₂) and to a quadrupling of the preindustrial concentration (4×CO₂), are also analyzed. For the full LGM simulation, the estimated equilibrium cooling of the global mean annual surface temperature is 5.5°C with an estimated radiative forcing of -6.2 W m⁻². The radiative forcing includes the effects of the reduced LGM greenhouse gases, ice sheets, continental distribution with sea level lowered by approximately 120 m from the present, and orbital parameters, but not changes to atmospheric aerosols or vegetation biogeography. The LGM simulation has an equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) of 3.1(±0.3)°C, comparable to the CCSM4 4×CO₂ result. The LGMCO₂ simulation shows a greater ECS of 4.2°C. Other responses found at the LGM in CCSM4 include a global precipitation rate decrease at a rate of ~2% °C−1, similar to climate change simulations in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC AR4); a strengthening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) with a shoaling of North Atlantic Deep Water and a filling of the deep basin up to sill depth with Antarctic Bottom Water; and an enhanced seasonal cycle accompanied by reduced ENSO variability in the eastern Pacific Ocean’s SSTs.
author2 Brady, Esther (author)
Otto-Bliesner, Bette (author)
Kay, Jennifer (author)
Rosenbloom, Nan (author)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
title Sensitivity to glacial forcing in the CCSM4
spellingShingle Sensitivity to glacial forcing in the CCSM4
title_short Sensitivity to glacial forcing in the CCSM4
title_full Sensitivity to glacial forcing in the CCSM4
title_fullStr Sensitivity to glacial forcing in the CCSM4
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity to glacial forcing in the CCSM4
title_sort sensitivity to glacial forcing in the ccsm4
publisher American Meteorological Society
publishDate 2013
url http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-015-454
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00416.1
geographic Antarctic
Pacific
geographic_facet Antarctic
Pacific
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
North Atlantic Deep Water
North Atlantic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
North Atlantic Deep Water
North Atlantic
op_relation Journal of Climate
http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-015-454
doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00416.1
ark:/85065/d79g5nn1
op_rights Copyright 2013 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 USC, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the Society's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statements, requires written permission or license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policies, available from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or amspubs@ametsoc.org. Permission to place a copy of this work on this server has been provided by the AMS. The AMS does not guarantee that the copy provided here is an accurate copy of the published work.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00416.1
container_title Journal of Climate
container_volume 26
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1901
op_container_end_page 1925
_version_ 1776204669186473984