Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4
The representation of permafrost and seasonally frozen ground and their projected twenty-first century trends is assessed in the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) and the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4). The combined impact of advances in CLM and a better Arctic climate simulat...
Published in: | Journal of Climate |
---|---|
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Meteorological Society
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-667 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1 |
_version_ | 1821849541483167744 |
---|---|
author2 | Lawrence, David (author) Slater, Andrew (author) Swenson, Sean (author) |
collection | OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research) |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2207 |
container_title | Journal of Climate |
container_volume | 25 |
description | The representation of permafrost and seasonally frozen ground and their projected twenty-first century trends is assessed in the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) and the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4). The combined impact of advances in CLM and a better Arctic climate simulation, especially for air temperature, improve the permafrost simulation in CCSM4 compared to CCSM3. Present-day continuous plus discontinuous permafrost extent is comparable to that observed [12.5 × 10⁶ versus (11.8-14.6) × 10⁶ km²], but active-layer thickness (ALT) is generally too thick and deep ground (>15 m) temperatures are too warm in CCSM4. Present-day seasonally frozen ground area is well simulated (47.5 × 10⁶ versus 48.1 × 10⁶ km²). ALT and deep ground temperatures are much better simulated in offline CLM4 (i.e., forced with observed climate), which indicates that the remaining climate biases, particularly excessive high-latitude snowfall biases, degrade the CCSM4 permafrost simulation. Near-surface permafrost (NSP) and seasonally frozen ground (SFG) area are projected to decline substantially during the twenty-first century [representative concentration projections (RCPs); RCP8.5: NSP by 9.0 × 10⁶ km², 72%, SFG by 7.1 × 10⁶, 15%; RCP2.6: NSP by 4.1 × 10⁶, 33%, SFG by 2.1 × 10⁶, 4%]. The permafrost degradation rate is slower (2000-50) than in CCSM3 by ~35% because of the improved soil physics. Under the low RCP2.6 emissions pathway, permafrost state stabilizes by 2100, suggesting that permafrost related feedbacks could be minimized if greenhouse emissions could be reduced. The trajectory of permafrost degradation is affected by CCSM4 climate biases. In simulations with this climate bias ameliorated, permafrost degradation in RCP8.5 is lower by ~29%. Further reductions of Arctic climate biases will increase the reliability of permafrost projections and feedback studies in earth system models. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Active layer thickness Arctic permafrost |
genre_facet | Active layer thickness Arctic permafrost |
geographic | Arctic |
geographic_facet | Arctic |
id | ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_11914 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftncar |
op_container_end_page | 2225 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1 |
op_relation | Journal of Climate http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-667 doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1 ark:/85065/d71z454g |
op_rights | Copyright 2012 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 USC, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the Society's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statements, requires written permission or license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policies, available from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or amspubs@ametsoc.org. Permission to place a copy of this work on this server has been provided by the AMS. The AMS does not guarantee that the copy provided here is an accurate copy of the published work. |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | American Meteorological Society |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_11914 2025-01-16T18:35:19+00:00 Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4 Lawrence, David (author) Slater, Andrew (author) Swenson, Sean (author) 2012-04-01 application/pdf http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-667 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1 en eng American Meteorological Society Journal of Climate http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-667 doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1 ark:/85065/d71z454g Copyright 2012 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 USC, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the Society's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statements, requires written permission or license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policies, available from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or amspubs@ametsoc.org. Permission to place a copy of this work on this server has been provided by the AMS. The AMS does not guarantee that the copy provided here is an accurate copy of the published work. Climate prediction Atmosphere-land interaction Land surface model Climate models Coupled models Text article 2012 ftncar https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1 2023-08-14T18:40:31Z The representation of permafrost and seasonally frozen ground and their projected twenty-first century trends is assessed in the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) and the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4). The combined impact of advances in CLM and a better Arctic climate simulation, especially for air temperature, improve the permafrost simulation in CCSM4 compared to CCSM3. Present-day continuous plus discontinuous permafrost extent is comparable to that observed [12.5 × 10⁶ versus (11.8-14.6) × 10⁶ km²], but active-layer thickness (ALT) is generally too thick and deep ground (>15 m) temperatures are too warm in CCSM4. Present-day seasonally frozen ground area is well simulated (47.5 × 10⁶ versus 48.1 × 10⁶ km²). ALT and deep ground temperatures are much better simulated in offline CLM4 (i.e., forced with observed climate), which indicates that the remaining climate biases, particularly excessive high-latitude snowfall biases, degrade the CCSM4 permafrost simulation. Near-surface permafrost (NSP) and seasonally frozen ground (SFG) area are projected to decline substantially during the twenty-first century [representative concentration projections (RCPs); RCP8.5: NSP by 9.0 × 10⁶ km², 72%, SFG by 7.1 × 10⁶, 15%; RCP2.6: NSP by 4.1 × 10⁶, 33%, SFG by 2.1 × 10⁶, 4%]. The permafrost degradation rate is slower (2000-50) than in CCSM3 by ~35% because of the improved soil physics. Under the low RCP2.6 emissions pathway, permafrost state stabilizes by 2100, suggesting that permafrost related feedbacks could be minimized if greenhouse emissions could be reduced. The trajectory of permafrost degradation is affected by CCSM4 climate biases. In simulations with this climate bias ameliorated, permafrost degradation in RCP8.5 is lower by ~29%. Further reductions of Arctic climate biases will increase the reliability of permafrost projections and feedback studies in earth system models. Article in Journal/Newspaper Active layer thickness Arctic permafrost OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research) Arctic Journal of Climate 25 7 2207 2225 |
spellingShingle | Climate prediction Atmosphere-land interaction Land surface model Climate models Coupled models Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4 |
title | Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4 |
title_full | Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4 |
title_fullStr | Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4 |
title_full_unstemmed | Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4 |
title_short | Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4 |
title_sort | simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in ccsm4 |
topic | Climate prediction Atmosphere-land interaction Land surface model Climate models Coupled models |
topic_facet | Climate prediction Atmosphere-land interaction Land surface model Climate models Coupled models |
url | http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-667 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1 |