Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4

The representation of permafrost and seasonally frozen ground and their projected twenty-first century trends is assessed in the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) and the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4). The combined impact of advances in CLM and a better Arctic climate simulat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Climate
Other Authors: Lawrence, David (author), Slater, Andrew (author), Swenson, Sean (author)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Meteorological Society 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-667
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1
_version_ 1821849541483167744
author2 Lawrence, David (author)
Slater, Andrew (author)
Swenson, Sean (author)
collection OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research)
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2207
container_title Journal of Climate
container_volume 25
description The representation of permafrost and seasonally frozen ground and their projected twenty-first century trends is assessed in the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) and the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4). The combined impact of advances in CLM and a better Arctic climate simulation, especially for air temperature, improve the permafrost simulation in CCSM4 compared to CCSM3. Present-day continuous plus discontinuous permafrost extent is comparable to that observed [12.5 × 10⁶ versus (11.8-14.6) × 10⁶ km²], but active-layer thickness (ALT) is generally too thick and deep ground (>15 m) temperatures are too warm in CCSM4. Present-day seasonally frozen ground area is well simulated (47.5 × 10⁶ versus 48.1 × 10⁶ km²). ALT and deep ground temperatures are much better simulated in offline CLM4 (i.e., forced with observed climate), which indicates that the remaining climate biases, particularly excessive high-latitude snowfall biases, degrade the CCSM4 permafrost simulation. Near-surface permafrost (NSP) and seasonally frozen ground (SFG) area are projected to decline substantially during the twenty-first century [representative concentration projections (RCPs); RCP8.5: NSP by 9.0 × 10⁶ km², 72%, SFG by 7.1 × 10⁶, 15%; RCP2.6: NSP by 4.1 × 10⁶, 33%, SFG by 2.1 × 10⁶, 4%]. The permafrost degradation rate is slower (2000-50) than in CCSM3 by ~35% because of the improved soil physics. Under the low RCP2.6 emissions pathway, permafrost state stabilizes by 2100, suggesting that permafrost related feedbacks could be minimized if greenhouse emissions could be reduced. The trajectory of permafrost degradation is affected by CCSM4 climate biases. In simulations with this climate bias ameliorated, permafrost degradation in RCP8.5 is lower by ~29%. Further reductions of Arctic climate biases will increase the reliability of permafrost projections and feedback studies in earth system models.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Active layer thickness
Arctic
permafrost
genre_facet Active layer thickness
Arctic
permafrost
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
id ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_11914
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftncar
op_container_end_page 2225
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1
op_relation Journal of Climate
http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-667
doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1
ark:/85065/d71z454g
op_rights Copyright 2012 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 USC, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the Society's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statements, requires written permission or license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policies, available from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or amspubs@ametsoc.org. Permission to place a copy of this work on this server has been provided by the AMS. The AMS does not guarantee that the copy provided here is an accurate copy of the published work.
publishDate 2012
publisher American Meteorological Society
record_format openpolar
spelling ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_11914 2025-01-16T18:35:19+00:00 Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4 Lawrence, David (author) Slater, Andrew (author) Swenson, Sean (author) 2012-04-01 application/pdf http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-667 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1 en eng American Meteorological Society Journal of Climate http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-667 doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1 ark:/85065/d71z454g Copyright 2012 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 USC, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the Society's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statements, requires written permission or license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policies, available from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or amspubs@ametsoc.org. Permission to place a copy of this work on this server has been provided by the AMS. The AMS does not guarantee that the copy provided here is an accurate copy of the published work. Climate prediction Atmosphere-land interaction Land surface model Climate models Coupled models Text article 2012 ftncar https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1 2023-08-14T18:40:31Z The representation of permafrost and seasonally frozen ground and their projected twenty-first century trends is assessed in the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) and the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4). The combined impact of advances in CLM and a better Arctic climate simulation, especially for air temperature, improve the permafrost simulation in CCSM4 compared to CCSM3. Present-day continuous plus discontinuous permafrost extent is comparable to that observed [12.5 × 10⁶ versus (11.8-14.6) × 10⁶ km²], but active-layer thickness (ALT) is generally too thick and deep ground (>15 m) temperatures are too warm in CCSM4. Present-day seasonally frozen ground area is well simulated (47.5 × 10⁶ versus 48.1 × 10⁶ km²). ALT and deep ground temperatures are much better simulated in offline CLM4 (i.e., forced with observed climate), which indicates that the remaining climate biases, particularly excessive high-latitude snowfall biases, degrade the CCSM4 permafrost simulation. Near-surface permafrost (NSP) and seasonally frozen ground (SFG) area are projected to decline substantially during the twenty-first century [representative concentration projections (RCPs); RCP8.5: NSP by 9.0 × 10⁶ km², 72%, SFG by 7.1 × 10⁶, 15%; RCP2.6: NSP by 4.1 × 10⁶, 33%, SFG by 2.1 × 10⁶, 4%]. The permafrost degradation rate is slower (2000-50) than in CCSM3 by ~35% because of the improved soil physics. Under the low RCP2.6 emissions pathway, permafrost state stabilizes by 2100, suggesting that permafrost related feedbacks could be minimized if greenhouse emissions could be reduced. The trajectory of permafrost degradation is affected by CCSM4 climate biases. In simulations with this climate bias ameliorated, permafrost degradation in RCP8.5 is lower by ~29%. Further reductions of Arctic climate biases will increase the reliability of permafrost projections and feedback studies in earth system models. Article in Journal/Newspaper Active layer thickness Arctic permafrost OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research) Arctic Journal of Climate 25 7 2207 2225
spellingShingle Climate prediction
Atmosphere-land interaction
Land surface model
Climate models
Coupled models
Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4
title Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4
title_full Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4
title_fullStr Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4
title_full_unstemmed Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4
title_short Simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in CCSM4
title_sort simulation of present-day and future permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions in ccsm4
topic Climate prediction
Atmosphere-land interaction
Land surface model
Climate models
Coupled models
topic_facet Climate prediction
Atmosphere-land interaction
Land surface model
Climate models
Coupled models
url http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-667
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00334.1