Is a bipolar seesaw consistent with observed Antarctic climate variability and trends?

A bipolar seesaw of Arctic and Antarctic temperature anomalies has been reported to be evident in instrumental data on decadal timescales during the last century. This finding hinges upon a global temperature data set that for the area poleward of ~60°S is derived from only one sub-Antarctic station...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Other Authors: Schneider, David (author), Noone, David (author)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-520
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050826
id ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_11800
record_format openpolar
spelling ftncar:oai:drupal-site.org:articles_11800 2023-09-05T13:13:59+02:00 Is a bipolar seesaw consistent with observed Antarctic climate variability and trends? Schneider, David (author) Noone, David (author) 2012-03-23 application/pdf http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-520 https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050826 en eng American Geophysical Union Geophysical Research Letters http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-520 doi:10.1029/2011GL050826 ark:/85065/d7cf9qr0 Copyright 2012 American Geophysical Union. Climate variability Bipolar seesaw Antarctica Text article 2012 ftncar https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050826 2023-08-14T18:40:23Z A bipolar seesaw of Arctic and Antarctic temperature anomalies has been reported to be evident in instrumental data on decadal timescales during the last century. This finding hinges upon a global temperature data set that for the area poleward of ~60°S is derived from only one sub-Antarctic station prior to the mid-1940s, and does not include a substantial number of Antarctic stations until the late 1950s. The timeseries of the single-station record for the early period spliced to the data based on broader coverage for the latter period is an artificial estimate of the Antarctic climate trend and its variability. We estimate the real variability using the original timeseries from the sub-Antarctic station, a reconstruction of the Southern Annular Mode index, and an ice-core based reconstruction of Antarctic temperature. None of these Antarctic timeseries are significantly correlated with Arctic or North Atlantic climate records, nor with the index of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, which was proposed as the driving mechanism of the seesaw. Instead, each of these records is consistently correlated with tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures. However, neither the seesaw nor the tropics alone can fully capture the complexity of Antarctic climate variability and climate change. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Arctic Climate change ice core North Atlantic OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research) Antarctic Arctic Pacific The Antarctic Geophysical Research Letters 39 6 n/a n/a
institution Open Polar
collection OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research)
op_collection_id ftncar
language English
topic Climate variability
Bipolar seesaw
Antarctica
spellingShingle Climate variability
Bipolar seesaw
Antarctica
Is a bipolar seesaw consistent with observed Antarctic climate variability and trends?
topic_facet Climate variability
Bipolar seesaw
Antarctica
description A bipolar seesaw of Arctic and Antarctic temperature anomalies has been reported to be evident in instrumental data on decadal timescales during the last century. This finding hinges upon a global temperature data set that for the area poleward of ~60°S is derived from only one sub-Antarctic station prior to the mid-1940s, and does not include a substantial number of Antarctic stations until the late 1950s. The timeseries of the single-station record for the early period spliced to the data based on broader coverage for the latter period is an artificial estimate of the Antarctic climate trend and its variability. We estimate the real variability using the original timeseries from the sub-Antarctic station, a reconstruction of the Southern Annular Mode index, and an ice-core based reconstruction of Antarctic temperature. None of these Antarctic timeseries are significantly correlated with Arctic or North Atlantic climate records, nor with the index of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, which was proposed as the driving mechanism of the seesaw. Instead, each of these records is consistently correlated with tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures. However, neither the seesaw nor the tropics alone can fully capture the complexity of Antarctic climate variability and climate change.
author2 Schneider, David (author)
Noone, David (author)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
title Is a bipolar seesaw consistent with observed Antarctic climate variability and trends?
title_short Is a bipolar seesaw consistent with observed Antarctic climate variability and trends?
title_full Is a bipolar seesaw consistent with observed Antarctic climate variability and trends?
title_fullStr Is a bipolar seesaw consistent with observed Antarctic climate variability and trends?
title_full_unstemmed Is a bipolar seesaw consistent with observed Antarctic climate variability and trends?
title_sort is a bipolar seesaw consistent with observed antarctic climate variability and trends?
publisher American Geophysical Union
publishDate 2012
url http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-520
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050826
geographic Antarctic
Arctic
Pacific
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Arctic
Pacific
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Arctic
Climate change
ice core
North Atlantic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Arctic
Climate change
ice core
North Atlantic
op_relation Geophysical Research Letters
http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-010-520
doi:10.1029/2011GL050826
ark:/85065/d7cf9qr0
op_rights Copyright 2012 American Geophysical Union.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050826
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 39
container_issue 6
container_start_page n/a
op_container_end_page n/a
_version_ 1776205074953928704