Phase zero contracting for U.S. Arctic national security

MBA Professional Report Arctic ice is receding and creating increased activity. A navigable Arctic poses security concerns, but also represents accessible resources and reduced shipping costs. This research investigates the following questions: Does the Department of Defense (DOD) have the capabilit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grant, Ricky A.
Other Authors: Yost, David, Mortlock, Robert, Department of Defense Management (DDM), Business & Policy (GSBPP)
Format: Thesis
Language:unknown
Published: Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10945/55603
id ftnavalpschool:oai:calhoun.nps.edu:10945/55603
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnavalpschool:oai:calhoun.nps.edu:10945/55603 2024-06-09T07:42:53+00:00 Phase zero contracting for U.S. Arctic national security Grant, Ricky A. Yost, David Mortlock, Robert Department of Defense Management (DDM) Business & Policy (GSBPP) 2017-06 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10945/55603 unknown Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School Master of Business Administration (MBA) Professional Reports https://hdl.handle.net/10945/55603 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. Arctic fixed-price cost-contract Agility Discipline and Risk Model Thesis 2017 ftnavalpschool 2024-05-15T00:34:07Z MBA Professional Report Arctic ice is receding and creating increased activity. A navigable Arctic poses security concerns, but also represents accessible resources and reduced shipping costs. This research investigates the following questions: Does the Department of Defense (DOD) have the capabilities to meet U.S. security objectives in the Arctic? What are the DOD's related national strategy responsibilities? What opportunities exist to minimize cost while providing capability? What contract actions are appropriate for Phase Zero of Arctic planning? Included is a literature review of national strategy and international policies, limited to specific research areas. Analysis of procurement stakeholder integration uses Yoder's Three-Tier Model. Examination of successful integration uses Yoder's Three Integrated Pillars. The agility, discipline, and risk pillars are used to determine contract considerations. This research found that the DOD is not prepared to conduct military operations in the Arctic, and has deficiencies in equipment and training for national defense roles. Also, the DOD lacks trained personnel capable in the immersive interagency, international, and non-governmental integration necessary for procurement efforts. There are several tasks the DOD is charged with supporting; only one task was specified. Joint interagency integration and selection of an appropriate contract type are key to meeting U.S. national security objectives in the Arctic. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Captain, United States Army http://archive.org/details/phasezerocontrac1094555603 Thesis Arctic Naval Postgraduate School: Calhoun Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Naval Postgraduate School: Calhoun
op_collection_id ftnavalpschool
language unknown
topic Arctic
fixed-price
cost-contract
Agility
Discipline
and Risk Model
spellingShingle Arctic
fixed-price
cost-contract
Agility
Discipline
and Risk Model
Grant, Ricky A.
Phase zero contracting for U.S. Arctic national security
topic_facet Arctic
fixed-price
cost-contract
Agility
Discipline
and Risk Model
description MBA Professional Report Arctic ice is receding and creating increased activity. A navigable Arctic poses security concerns, but also represents accessible resources and reduced shipping costs. This research investigates the following questions: Does the Department of Defense (DOD) have the capabilities to meet U.S. security objectives in the Arctic? What are the DOD's related national strategy responsibilities? What opportunities exist to minimize cost while providing capability? What contract actions are appropriate for Phase Zero of Arctic planning? Included is a literature review of national strategy and international policies, limited to specific research areas. Analysis of procurement stakeholder integration uses Yoder's Three-Tier Model. Examination of successful integration uses Yoder's Three Integrated Pillars. The agility, discipline, and risk pillars are used to determine contract considerations. This research found that the DOD is not prepared to conduct military operations in the Arctic, and has deficiencies in equipment and training for national defense roles. Also, the DOD lacks trained personnel capable in the immersive interagency, international, and non-governmental integration necessary for procurement efforts. There are several tasks the DOD is charged with supporting; only one task was specified. Joint interagency integration and selection of an appropriate contract type are key to meeting U.S. national security objectives in the Arctic. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Captain, United States Army http://archive.org/details/phasezerocontrac1094555603
author2 Yost, David
Mortlock, Robert
Department of Defense Management (DDM)
Business & Policy (GSBPP)
format Thesis
author Grant, Ricky A.
author_facet Grant, Ricky A.
author_sort Grant, Ricky A.
title Phase zero contracting for U.S. Arctic national security
title_short Phase zero contracting for U.S. Arctic national security
title_full Phase zero contracting for U.S. Arctic national security
title_fullStr Phase zero contracting for U.S. Arctic national security
title_full_unstemmed Phase zero contracting for U.S. Arctic national security
title_sort phase zero contracting for u.s. arctic national security
publisher Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/10945/55603
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation Master of Business Administration (MBA) Professional Reports
https://hdl.handle.net/10945/55603
op_rights This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
_version_ 1801371584003309568