Force, Statecraft and German Unity: The Struggle to Adapt Institutions and Practices

Concerning Bonn's ongoing attempt to adapt institutions and practices, German policy making is clearly a manifestation of officials largely navigating in a little-known policy milieu. Realpolitik, let alone Machtpolitik (either as mere terms, let alone as concepts) are neither freely used in &q...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Young, Thomas-Durell
Language:unknown
Published: 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10945/42364
id ftnavalpschool:oai:calhoun.nps.edu:10945/42364
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnavalpschool:oai:calhoun.nps.edu:10945/42364 2024-06-09T07:48:22+00:00 Force, Statecraft and German Unity: The Struggle to Adapt Institutions and Practices Young, Thomas-Durell 1996 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10945/42364 unknown https://hdl.handle.net/10945/42364 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. 1996 ftnavalpschool 2024-05-15T00:52:29Z Concerning Bonn's ongoing attempt to adapt institutions and practices, German policy making is clearly a manifestation of officials largely navigating in a little-known policy milieu. Realpolitik, let alone Machtpolitik (either as mere terms, let alone as concepts) are neither freely used in "polite" political discord in Germany, nor widely contemplated. One can make two general observations concerning Bonn's ongoing attempt to adapt institutions and practices. First, confusion in German policy making is clearly a manifestation of officials largely navigating in a little-known policy milieu. Realpolitik, let alone Machtpolitik (either as mere terms, let alone as concepts) are neither freely used in "polite" political discord in Germany, nor widely contemplated. As a result of a wide-spread political culture governed by self-restraint, confronting difficult issues in their proper context has made decision making frequently complicated and confusing to outside observers. What we are presently witnessing is a learning period in German external policy making, with all of its attendant errors. It is an open question how long this educational process will last or if the German body politic is prepared for such straight forward discussion. Second, perturbations in policy formation are partly a result of Bonn's approach to foreign and security policies which remains exclusively defined and expressed by the German government in the context of the North Atlantic Alliance and the emerging European Security and Defense Identity. Indeed, there is no sizeable political bloc in the Federal Republic that argues otherwise. In consequence, there is no evidence that Bonn is prepared to consider adopting a national approach to national security. In sum, German statecraft has the unenviable task of legitimizing its new national status, not only before its allies and neighbors, but also before a skeptical German public. Given the history of statecraft in a unified Germany, this will surely be a difficult and potentially time- ... Other/Unknown Material North Atlantic Naval Postgraduate School: Calhoun
institution Open Polar
collection Naval Postgraduate School: Calhoun
op_collection_id ftnavalpschool
language unknown
description Concerning Bonn's ongoing attempt to adapt institutions and practices, German policy making is clearly a manifestation of officials largely navigating in a little-known policy milieu. Realpolitik, let alone Machtpolitik (either as mere terms, let alone as concepts) are neither freely used in "polite" political discord in Germany, nor widely contemplated. One can make two general observations concerning Bonn's ongoing attempt to adapt institutions and practices. First, confusion in German policy making is clearly a manifestation of officials largely navigating in a little-known policy milieu. Realpolitik, let alone Machtpolitik (either as mere terms, let alone as concepts) are neither freely used in "polite" political discord in Germany, nor widely contemplated. As a result of a wide-spread political culture governed by self-restraint, confronting difficult issues in their proper context has made decision making frequently complicated and confusing to outside observers. What we are presently witnessing is a learning period in German external policy making, with all of its attendant errors. It is an open question how long this educational process will last or if the German body politic is prepared for such straight forward discussion. Second, perturbations in policy formation are partly a result of Bonn's approach to foreign and security policies which remains exclusively defined and expressed by the German government in the context of the North Atlantic Alliance and the emerging European Security and Defense Identity. Indeed, there is no sizeable political bloc in the Federal Republic that argues otherwise. In consequence, there is no evidence that Bonn is prepared to consider adopting a national approach to national security. In sum, German statecraft has the unenviable task of legitimizing its new national status, not only before its allies and neighbors, but also before a skeptical German public. Given the history of statecraft in a unified Germany, this will surely be a difficult and potentially time- ...
author2 Young, Thomas-Durell
title Force, Statecraft and German Unity: The Struggle to Adapt Institutions and Practices
spellingShingle Force, Statecraft and German Unity: The Struggle to Adapt Institutions and Practices
title_short Force, Statecraft and German Unity: The Struggle to Adapt Institutions and Practices
title_full Force, Statecraft and German Unity: The Struggle to Adapt Institutions and Practices
title_fullStr Force, Statecraft and German Unity: The Struggle to Adapt Institutions and Practices
title_full_unstemmed Force, Statecraft and German Unity: The Struggle to Adapt Institutions and Practices
title_sort force, statecraft and german unity: the struggle to adapt institutions and practices
publishDate 1996
url https://hdl.handle.net/10945/42364
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_relation https://hdl.handle.net/10945/42364
op_rights This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
_version_ 1801380044358025216