The Soviet Nordic Nuclear Weapon Free Zone proposal

This thesis examines the Soviet proposal and its ramifications for the United States and the West. The central theme running through each Soviet proposal has been removal of American nuclear guarantees. Preservation of US national security interests and hence US ability to extend its forward defense...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lumsden, Catherine Anne
Other Authors: Tritten, James J., Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.), National Security Affairs (NSA), Minott, Rodney K.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School 1990
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10945/30655
id ftnavalpschool:oai:calhoun.nps.edu:10945/30655
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnavalpschool:oai:calhoun.nps.edu:10945/30655 2024-06-09T07:46:23+00:00 The Soviet Nordic Nuclear Weapon Free Zone proposal Lumsden, Catherine Anne Tritten, James J. Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.) National Security Affairs (NSA) Minott, Rodney K. 1990-06 vii, 123 p. application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10945/30655 en_US eng Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School https://hdl.handle.net/10945/30655 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. Arms control nuclear free zones Scandanavia Nuclear-weapon-free zones,Scandinavia Nuclear arms control,Soviet Union Thesis 1990 ftnavalpschool 2024-05-15T01:00:42Z This thesis examines the Soviet proposal and its ramifications for the United States and the West. The central theme running through each Soviet proposal has been removal of American nuclear guarantees. Preservation of US national security interests and hence US ability to extend its forward defense would be gravely threatened by such a NWFZ. However, unilateral agreement on a NWFZ is unlikely by the anticipated members of the Nordic NWFZ the US, USSR, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Iceland, Greenland, and Sweden. The US has military installations in Iceland and Greenland and banning of nuclear weapons during wartime is inconceivable. The question then arises as to which nation or groups of nations will dominate and which will acquiesce. Inevitably the debate breaks down to a tug of war between the two superpowers. It is really the politics surrounding the nuclear weapons that is the heart of the nuclear-free-zone debate. Changing world politics demand that the West develop a unified strategy toward the USSR. Through NATO it must preserve its vital economic political and military objectives in the Northern Flank. Flexible naval forces and strong political and economic ties to the governments of the nations bordering the Baltic are essential. Strong NATO naval forces operating in the Baltic Sea must be seen as guarantors of the West's strategic aims and interests. A Nordic NWFZ would prevent this. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Lieutenant, United States Navy http://archive.org/details/thesovietnordicn1094530655 Thesis Greenland Iceland Naval Postgraduate School: Calhoun Greenland Norway
institution Open Polar
collection Naval Postgraduate School: Calhoun
op_collection_id ftnavalpschool
language English
topic Arms control
nuclear free zones
Scandanavia
Nuclear-weapon-free zones,Scandinavia
Nuclear arms control,Soviet Union
spellingShingle Arms control
nuclear free zones
Scandanavia
Nuclear-weapon-free zones,Scandinavia
Nuclear arms control,Soviet Union
Lumsden, Catherine Anne
The Soviet Nordic Nuclear Weapon Free Zone proposal
topic_facet Arms control
nuclear free zones
Scandanavia
Nuclear-weapon-free zones,Scandinavia
Nuclear arms control,Soviet Union
description This thesis examines the Soviet proposal and its ramifications for the United States and the West. The central theme running through each Soviet proposal has been removal of American nuclear guarantees. Preservation of US national security interests and hence US ability to extend its forward defense would be gravely threatened by such a NWFZ. However, unilateral agreement on a NWFZ is unlikely by the anticipated members of the Nordic NWFZ the US, USSR, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Iceland, Greenland, and Sweden. The US has military installations in Iceland and Greenland and banning of nuclear weapons during wartime is inconceivable. The question then arises as to which nation or groups of nations will dominate and which will acquiesce. Inevitably the debate breaks down to a tug of war between the two superpowers. It is really the politics surrounding the nuclear weapons that is the heart of the nuclear-free-zone debate. Changing world politics demand that the West develop a unified strategy toward the USSR. Through NATO it must preserve its vital economic political and military objectives in the Northern Flank. Flexible naval forces and strong political and economic ties to the governments of the nations bordering the Baltic are essential. Strong NATO naval forces operating in the Baltic Sea must be seen as guarantors of the West's strategic aims and interests. A Nordic NWFZ would prevent this. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Lieutenant, United States Navy http://archive.org/details/thesovietnordicn1094530655
author2 Tritten, James J.
Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
National Security Affairs (NSA)
Minott, Rodney K.
format Thesis
author Lumsden, Catherine Anne
author_facet Lumsden, Catherine Anne
author_sort Lumsden, Catherine Anne
title The Soviet Nordic Nuclear Weapon Free Zone proposal
title_short The Soviet Nordic Nuclear Weapon Free Zone proposal
title_full The Soviet Nordic Nuclear Weapon Free Zone proposal
title_fullStr The Soviet Nordic Nuclear Weapon Free Zone proposal
title_full_unstemmed The Soviet Nordic Nuclear Weapon Free Zone proposal
title_sort soviet nordic nuclear weapon free zone proposal
publisher Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 1990
url https://hdl.handle.net/10945/30655
geographic Greenland
Norway
geographic_facet Greenland
Norway
genre Greenland
Iceland
genre_facet Greenland
Iceland
op_relation https://hdl.handle.net/10945/30655
op_rights This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
_version_ 1801376226359640064