Aerosol Retrievals from Different Polarimeters During the ACEPOL Campaign Using a Common Retrieval Algorithm

In this paper, we present aerosol retrieval results from the ACEPOL (Aerosol Characterization from Polarimeter and Lidar) campaign, which was a joint initiative between NASA and SRON the Netherlands Institute for Space Research. The campaign took place in OctoberNovember 2017 over the western part o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diner, David, Seidel, Felix, Smit, Martijn, Knobelspiesse, Kirk, Di Noia, Antonio, Ferrare, Richard, da Silva, Arlindo, Cairns, Brian, Hostetler, Chris, Hair, John, Rietjens, Jeroen, Burton, Sharon, Gao, Meng, Fu, Guangliang, Wasilewski, Andrzej, Hasekamp, Otto, Xu, Feng
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20200002040
id ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:20200002040
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:20200002040 2023-05-15T13:07:15+02:00 Aerosol Retrievals from Different Polarimeters During the ACEPOL Campaign Using a Common Retrieval Algorithm Diner, David Seidel, Felix Smit, Martijn Knobelspiesse, Kirk Di Noia, Antonio Ferrare, Richard da Silva, Arlindo Cairns, Brian Hostetler, Chris Hair, John Rietjens, Jeroen Burton, Sharon Gao, Meng Fu, Guangliang Wasilewski, Andrzej Hasekamp, Otto Xu, Feng Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available February 7, 2020 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20200002040 unknown Document ID: 20200002040 http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20200002040 Copyright, Use by or on behalf of the U.S. Government permitted CASI Meteorology and Climatology Earth Resources and Remote Sensing GSFC-E-DAA-TN78033 Atmospheric Measurement Techniques; 13; 2; 553–573 2020 ftnasantrs 2020-04-11T22:47:51Z In this paper, we present aerosol retrieval results from the ACEPOL (Aerosol Characterization from Polarimeter and Lidar) campaign, which was a joint initiative between NASA and SRON the Netherlands Institute for Space Research. The campaign took place in OctoberNovember 2017 over the western part of the United States. During ACEPOL six different instruments were deployed on the NASA ER-2 high-altitude aircraft, including four multi-angle polarimeters (MAPs): SPEX airborne, the Airborne Hyper Angular Rainbow Polarimeter (AirHARP), the Airborne Multi-angle SpectroPolarimetric Imager (AirMSPI), and the Research Scanning Polarimeter (RSP). Also, two lidars participated: the High Spectral Resolution Lidar-2 (HSRL-2) and the Cloud Physics Lidar (CPL). Flights were conducted mainly for scenes with low aerosol load over land, but some cases with higher AOD were also observed. We perform aerosol retrievals from SPEX airborne, RSP (410865 nm range only), and AirMSPI using the SRON aerosol retrieval algorithm and compare the results against AERONET (AErosol RObotic NETwork) and HSRL-2 measurements (for SPEX airborne and RSP). All three MAPs compare well against AERONET for the aerosol optical depth (AOD), with a mean absolute error (MAE) between 0.014 and 0.024 at 440 nm. For the fine-mode effective radius the MAE ranges between 0.021 and 0.028 m. For the comparison with HSRL-2 we focus on a day with low AOD (0.020.14 at 532 nm) over the California Central Valley, Arizona, and Nevada (26 October) as well as a flight with high AOD (including measurements with AOD>1.0 at 532 nm) over a prescribed forest fire in Arizona (9 November). For the day with low AOD the MAEs in AOD (at 532 nm) with HSRL-2 are 0.014 and 0.022 for SPEX and RSP, respectively, showing the capability of MAPs to provide accurate AOD retrievals for the challenging case of low AOD over land. For the retrievals over the smoke plume a reasonable agreement in AOD between the MAPs and HSRL-2 was also found (MAE 0.088 and 0.079 for SPEX and RSP, respectively), despite the fact that the comparison is hampered by large spatial variability in AOD throughout the smoke plume. A good comparison is also found between the MAPs and HSRL-2 for the aerosol depolarization ratio (a measure of particle sphericity), with an MAE of 0.023 and 0.016 for SPEX and RSP, respectively. Finally, SPEX and RSP agree very well for the retrieved microphysical and optical properties of the smoke plume. Other/Unknown Material Aerosol Robotic Network NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
institution Open Polar
collection NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
op_collection_id ftnasantrs
language unknown
topic Meteorology and Climatology
Earth Resources and Remote Sensing
spellingShingle Meteorology and Climatology
Earth Resources and Remote Sensing
Diner, David
Seidel, Felix
Smit, Martijn
Knobelspiesse, Kirk
Di Noia, Antonio
Ferrare, Richard
da Silva, Arlindo
Cairns, Brian
Hostetler, Chris
Hair, John
Rietjens, Jeroen
Burton, Sharon
Gao, Meng
Fu, Guangliang
Wasilewski, Andrzej
Hasekamp, Otto
Xu, Feng
Aerosol Retrievals from Different Polarimeters During the ACEPOL Campaign Using a Common Retrieval Algorithm
topic_facet Meteorology and Climatology
Earth Resources and Remote Sensing
description In this paper, we present aerosol retrieval results from the ACEPOL (Aerosol Characterization from Polarimeter and Lidar) campaign, which was a joint initiative between NASA and SRON the Netherlands Institute for Space Research. The campaign took place in OctoberNovember 2017 over the western part of the United States. During ACEPOL six different instruments were deployed on the NASA ER-2 high-altitude aircraft, including four multi-angle polarimeters (MAPs): SPEX airborne, the Airborne Hyper Angular Rainbow Polarimeter (AirHARP), the Airborne Multi-angle SpectroPolarimetric Imager (AirMSPI), and the Research Scanning Polarimeter (RSP). Also, two lidars participated: the High Spectral Resolution Lidar-2 (HSRL-2) and the Cloud Physics Lidar (CPL). Flights were conducted mainly for scenes with low aerosol load over land, but some cases with higher AOD were also observed. We perform aerosol retrievals from SPEX airborne, RSP (410865 nm range only), and AirMSPI using the SRON aerosol retrieval algorithm and compare the results against AERONET (AErosol RObotic NETwork) and HSRL-2 measurements (for SPEX airborne and RSP). All three MAPs compare well against AERONET for the aerosol optical depth (AOD), with a mean absolute error (MAE) between 0.014 and 0.024 at 440 nm. For the fine-mode effective radius the MAE ranges between 0.021 and 0.028 m. For the comparison with HSRL-2 we focus on a day with low AOD (0.020.14 at 532 nm) over the California Central Valley, Arizona, and Nevada (26 October) as well as a flight with high AOD (including measurements with AOD>1.0 at 532 nm) over a prescribed forest fire in Arizona (9 November). For the day with low AOD the MAEs in AOD (at 532 nm) with HSRL-2 are 0.014 and 0.022 for SPEX and RSP, respectively, showing the capability of MAPs to provide accurate AOD retrievals for the challenging case of low AOD over land. For the retrievals over the smoke plume a reasonable agreement in AOD between the MAPs and HSRL-2 was also found (MAE 0.088 and 0.079 for SPEX and RSP, respectively), despite the fact that the comparison is hampered by large spatial variability in AOD throughout the smoke plume. A good comparison is also found between the MAPs and HSRL-2 for the aerosol depolarization ratio (a measure of particle sphericity), with an MAE of 0.023 and 0.016 for SPEX and RSP, respectively. Finally, SPEX and RSP agree very well for the retrieved microphysical and optical properties of the smoke plume.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Diner, David
Seidel, Felix
Smit, Martijn
Knobelspiesse, Kirk
Di Noia, Antonio
Ferrare, Richard
da Silva, Arlindo
Cairns, Brian
Hostetler, Chris
Hair, John
Rietjens, Jeroen
Burton, Sharon
Gao, Meng
Fu, Guangliang
Wasilewski, Andrzej
Hasekamp, Otto
Xu, Feng
author_facet Diner, David
Seidel, Felix
Smit, Martijn
Knobelspiesse, Kirk
Di Noia, Antonio
Ferrare, Richard
da Silva, Arlindo
Cairns, Brian
Hostetler, Chris
Hair, John
Rietjens, Jeroen
Burton, Sharon
Gao, Meng
Fu, Guangliang
Wasilewski, Andrzej
Hasekamp, Otto
Xu, Feng
author_sort Diner, David
title Aerosol Retrievals from Different Polarimeters During the ACEPOL Campaign Using a Common Retrieval Algorithm
title_short Aerosol Retrievals from Different Polarimeters During the ACEPOL Campaign Using a Common Retrieval Algorithm
title_full Aerosol Retrievals from Different Polarimeters During the ACEPOL Campaign Using a Common Retrieval Algorithm
title_fullStr Aerosol Retrievals from Different Polarimeters During the ACEPOL Campaign Using a Common Retrieval Algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Aerosol Retrievals from Different Polarimeters During the ACEPOL Campaign Using a Common Retrieval Algorithm
title_sort aerosol retrievals from different polarimeters during the acepol campaign using a common retrieval algorithm
publishDate 2020
url http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20200002040
op_coverage Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available
genre Aerosol Robotic Network
genre_facet Aerosol Robotic Network
op_source CASI
op_relation Document ID: 20200002040
http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20200002040
op_rights Copyright, Use by or on behalf of the U.S. Government permitted
_version_ 1766042596483792896