Prospects for Dating the South Pole-Aitken Basin through Impact-Melt Rock Samples

Much of the present debate about the ages of the nearside basins arises because of the difficulty in understanding the relationship of recovered samples to their parent basin. The Apollo breccias are from basin ejecta formations, which are ballistically-emplaced distal deposits that have mixed prove...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Coker, R. F., Cohen, B. A., Petro, N. E.
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20160013272
id ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:20160013272
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:20160013272 2023-05-15T18:22:06+02:00 Prospects for Dating the South Pole-Aitken Basin through Impact-Melt Rock Samples Coker, R. F. Cohen, B. A. Petro, N. E. Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available November 2016 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20160013272 unknown Document ID: 20160013272 http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20160013272 No Copyright CASI Lunar and Planetary Science and Exploration MSFC-E-DAA-TN35486 Lunar Exploration and Analysis Group (LEAG); Nov 01, 2016 - Nov 03, 2016; Columbia, MD; United States 2016 ftnasantrs 2019-08-31T23:09:13Z Much of the present debate about the ages of the nearside basins arises because of the difficulty in understanding the relationship of recovered samples to their parent basin. The Apollo breccias are from basin ejecta formations, which are ballistically-emplaced distal deposits that have mixed provenances. The Nectaris, Imbrium, and Serenitatis basins all have mare-basalt fill obscuring their original melt sheets, so geochemical ties are indirect. Though the geological processes acting to vertically and laterally mix materials into regolith are the same as at the Apollo sites, the SPA interior is a fundamentally different geologic setting than the Apollo sites. The South Pole-Aitken basin was likely filled by a large impact melt sheet, possibly differentiated into cumulate horizons. It is on this distinctive melt sheet that the regolith has formed, somewhat diluting but not erasing the prominent geochemical signature seen from orbital assets. By analogy to the Apollo 16 site, a zeroth-order expectation is that bulk samples taken from regolith within SPA will contain abundant samples gardened from the SPA melt sheet. However, questions persist as to whether the SPA melt sheet has been so extensively contaminated with foreign ejecta that a simple robotic scoop sample of such regolith would be unlikely to yield the age of the basin. Other/Unknown Material South pole NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) Aitken ENVELOPE(-44.516,-44.516,-60.733,-60.733) South Pole
institution Open Polar
collection NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
op_collection_id ftnasantrs
language unknown
topic Lunar and Planetary Science and Exploration
spellingShingle Lunar and Planetary Science and Exploration
Coker, R. F.
Cohen, B. A.
Petro, N. E.
Prospects for Dating the South Pole-Aitken Basin through Impact-Melt Rock Samples
topic_facet Lunar and Planetary Science and Exploration
description Much of the present debate about the ages of the nearside basins arises because of the difficulty in understanding the relationship of recovered samples to their parent basin. The Apollo breccias are from basin ejecta formations, which are ballistically-emplaced distal deposits that have mixed provenances. The Nectaris, Imbrium, and Serenitatis basins all have mare-basalt fill obscuring their original melt sheets, so geochemical ties are indirect. Though the geological processes acting to vertically and laterally mix materials into regolith are the same as at the Apollo sites, the SPA interior is a fundamentally different geologic setting than the Apollo sites. The South Pole-Aitken basin was likely filled by a large impact melt sheet, possibly differentiated into cumulate horizons. It is on this distinctive melt sheet that the regolith has formed, somewhat diluting but not erasing the prominent geochemical signature seen from orbital assets. By analogy to the Apollo 16 site, a zeroth-order expectation is that bulk samples taken from regolith within SPA will contain abundant samples gardened from the SPA melt sheet. However, questions persist as to whether the SPA melt sheet has been so extensively contaminated with foreign ejecta that a simple robotic scoop sample of such regolith would be unlikely to yield the age of the basin.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Coker, R. F.
Cohen, B. A.
Petro, N. E.
author_facet Coker, R. F.
Cohen, B. A.
Petro, N. E.
author_sort Coker, R. F.
title Prospects for Dating the South Pole-Aitken Basin through Impact-Melt Rock Samples
title_short Prospects for Dating the South Pole-Aitken Basin through Impact-Melt Rock Samples
title_full Prospects for Dating the South Pole-Aitken Basin through Impact-Melt Rock Samples
title_fullStr Prospects for Dating the South Pole-Aitken Basin through Impact-Melt Rock Samples
title_full_unstemmed Prospects for Dating the South Pole-Aitken Basin through Impact-Melt Rock Samples
title_sort prospects for dating the south pole-aitken basin through impact-melt rock samples
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20160013272
op_coverage Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available
long_lat ENVELOPE(-44.516,-44.516,-60.733,-60.733)
geographic Aitken
South Pole
geographic_facet Aitken
South Pole
genre South pole
genre_facet South pole
op_source CASI
op_relation Document ID: 20160013272
http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20160013272
op_rights No Copyright
_version_ 1766201451549294592