The Energy Budget of the Polar Atmosphere in MERRA

Components of the atmospheric energy budget from the Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) are evaluated in polar regions for the period 1979-2005 and compared with previous estimates, in situ observations, and contemporary reanalyses. Closure of the energy budget i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bosilovich, Michael G., Cullather, Richard I.
Language:unknown
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20110007312
id ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:20110007312
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:20110007312 2023-05-15T13:11:45+02:00 The Energy Budget of the Polar Atmosphere in MERRA Bosilovich, Michael G. Cullather, Richard I. Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available [2010] application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20110007312 unknown Document ID: 20110007312 http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20110007312 Copyright, Distribution as joint owner in the copyright CASI Meteorology and Climatology 2010 ftnasantrs 2018-06-09T22:57:25Z Components of the atmospheric energy budget from the Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) are evaluated in polar regions for the period 1979-2005 and compared with previous estimates, in situ observations, and contemporary reanalyses. Closure of the energy budget is reflected by the analysis increments term, which results from virtual enthalpy and latent heating contributions and averages -11 W/sq m over the north polar cap and -22 W/sq m over the south polar cap. Total energy tendency and energy convergence terms from MERRA agree closely with previous study for northern high latitudes but convergence exceeds previous estimates for the south polar cap by 46 percent. Discrepancies with the Southern Hemisphere transport are largest in autumn and may be related to differences in topography with earlier reanalyses. For the Arctic, differences between MERRA and other sources in TOA and surface radiative fluxes maximize in May. These differences are concurrent with the largest discrepancies between MERRA parameterized and observed surface albedo. For May, in situ observations of the upwelling shortwave flux in the Arctic are 80 W/sq m larger than MERRA, while the MERRA downwelling longwave flux is underestimated by 12 W/sq m throughout the year. Over grounded ice sheets, the annual mean net surface energy flux in MERRA is erroneously non-zero. Contemporary reanalyses from the Climate Forecast Center (CFSR) and the Interim Re-Analyses of the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ERA-I) are found to have better surface parameterizations, however these collections are also found to have significant discrepancies with observed surface and TOA energy fluxes. Discrepancies among available reanalyses underscore the challenge of reproducing credible estimates of the atmospheric energy budget in polar regions. Other/Unknown Material albedo Arctic NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) Arctic Merra ENVELOPE(12.615,12.615,65.816,65.816)
institution Open Polar
collection NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
op_collection_id ftnasantrs
language unknown
topic Meteorology and Climatology
spellingShingle Meteorology and Climatology
Bosilovich, Michael G.
Cullather, Richard I.
The Energy Budget of the Polar Atmosphere in MERRA
topic_facet Meteorology and Climatology
description Components of the atmospheric energy budget from the Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) are evaluated in polar regions for the period 1979-2005 and compared with previous estimates, in situ observations, and contemporary reanalyses. Closure of the energy budget is reflected by the analysis increments term, which results from virtual enthalpy and latent heating contributions and averages -11 W/sq m over the north polar cap and -22 W/sq m over the south polar cap. Total energy tendency and energy convergence terms from MERRA agree closely with previous study for northern high latitudes but convergence exceeds previous estimates for the south polar cap by 46 percent. Discrepancies with the Southern Hemisphere transport are largest in autumn and may be related to differences in topography with earlier reanalyses. For the Arctic, differences between MERRA and other sources in TOA and surface radiative fluxes maximize in May. These differences are concurrent with the largest discrepancies between MERRA parameterized and observed surface albedo. For May, in situ observations of the upwelling shortwave flux in the Arctic are 80 W/sq m larger than MERRA, while the MERRA downwelling longwave flux is underestimated by 12 W/sq m throughout the year. Over grounded ice sheets, the annual mean net surface energy flux in MERRA is erroneously non-zero. Contemporary reanalyses from the Climate Forecast Center (CFSR) and the Interim Re-Analyses of the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ERA-I) are found to have better surface parameterizations, however these collections are also found to have significant discrepancies with observed surface and TOA energy fluxes. Discrepancies among available reanalyses underscore the challenge of reproducing credible estimates of the atmospheric energy budget in polar regions.
author Bosilovich, Michael G.
Cullather, Richard I.
author_facet Bosilovich, Michael G.
Cullather, Richard I.
author_sort Bosilovich, Michael G.
title The Energy Budget of the Polar Atmosphere in MERRA
title_short The Energy Budget of the Polar Atmosphere in MERRA
title_full The Energy Budget of the Polar Atmosphere in MERRA
title_fullStr The Energy Budget of the Polar Atmosphere in MERRA
title_full_unstemmed The Energy Budget of the Polar Atmosphere in MERRA
title_sort energy budget of the polar atmosphere in merra
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20110007312
op_coverage Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available
long_lat ENVELOPE(12.615,12.615,65.816,65.816)
geographic Arctic
Merra
geographic_facet Arctic
Merra
genre albedo
Arctic
genre_facet albedo
Arctic
op_source CASI
op_relation Document ID: 20110007312
http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20110007312
op_rights Copyright, Distribution as joint owner in the copyright
_version_ 1766248800229261312