Tracking Data Certification for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

This paper details the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Flight Dynamics Facility (FDF) tracking data certification effort of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Space Communications Network (SCN) complement of tracking stations consisting of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Campion, Richard, Socoby, Joseph, Hendry, Steve, Morinelli, Patrick J.
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20100017175
id ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:20100017175
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:20100017175 2023-05-15T17:04:17+02:00 Tracking Data Certification for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Campion, Richard Socoby, Joseph Hendry, Steve Morinelli, Patrick J. Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available [2010] application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20100017175 unknown Document ID: 20100017175 http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20100017175 Copyright, Distribution under U.S. Government purpose rights CASI Space Communications Spacecraft Communications Command and Tracking SpaceOps 2010 Conference; 25-30 Apr. 2010; Huntsville, AL; United States 2010 ftnasantrs 2019-07-21T01:15:32Z This paper details the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Flight Dynamics Facility (FDF) tracking data certification effort of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Space Communications Network (SCN) complement of tracking stations consisting of the NASA White Sands 1 antenna (WS1), and the commercial provider Universal Space Network (USN) antennas at South Point, Hawaii; Dongara Australia; Weilheim, Germany; and Kiruna, Sweden. Certification assessment required the cooperation and coordination of parties not under the control of either the LRO project or ground stations as uplinks on cooperating spacecraft were necessary. The LRO range-tracking requirement of 10m 1 sigma could be satisfactorily demonstrated using any typical spacecraft capable of range tracking. Though typical Low Earth Orbiting (LEO) or Geosynchronous Earth Orbiting (GEO) spacecraft may be adequate for range certification, their measurement dynamics and noise would be unacceptable for proper Doppler certification of 1-3mm/sec 1 sigma. As LRO will orbit the Moon, it was imperative that a suitable target spacecraft be utilized which can closely mimic the expected lunar orbital Doppler dynamics of +/-1.6km/sec and +/-1.5m/sq sec to +/-0.15m/sq sec, is in view of the ground stations, supports coherent S-Band Doppler tracking measurements, and can be modeled by the FDF. In order to meet the LRO metric tracking data specifications, the SCN ground stations employed previously uncertified numerically controlled tracking receivers. Initial certification testing revealed certain characteristics of the units that required resolution before being granted certification. Other/Unknown Material Kiruna NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) Kiruna South Point ENVELOPE(-60.606,-60.606,-63.020,-63.020)
institution Open Polar
collection NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
op_collection_id ftnasantrs
language unknown
topic Space Communications
Spacecraft Communications
Command and Tracking
spellingShingle Space Communications
Spacecraft Communications
Command and Tracking
Campion, Richard
Socoby, Joseph
Hendry, Steve
Morinelli, Patrick J.
Tracking Data Certification for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
topic_facet Space Communications
Spacecraft Communications
Command and Tracking
description This paper details the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Flight Dynamics Facility (FDF) tracking data certification effort of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Space Communications Network (SCN) complement of tracking stations consisting of the NASA White Sands 1 antenna (WS1), and the commercial provider Universal Space Network (USN) antennas at South Point, Hawaii; Dongara Australia; Weilheim, Germany; and Kiruna, Sweden. Certification assessment required the cooperation and coordination of parties not under the control of either the LRO project or ground stations as uplinks on cooperating spacecraft were necessary. The LRO range-tracking requirement of 10m 1 sigma could be satisfactorily demonstrated using any typical spacecraft capable of range tracking. Though typical Low Earth Orbiting (LEO) or Geosynchronous Earth Orbiting (GEO) spacecraft may be adequate for range certification, their measurement dynamics and noise would be unacceptable for proper Doppler certification of 1-3mm/sec 1 sigma. As LRO will orbit the Moon, it was imperative that a suitable target spacecraft be utilized which can closely mimic the expected lunar orbital Doppler dynamics of +/-1.6km/sec and +/-1.5m/sq sec to +/-0.15m/sq sec, is in view of the ground stations, supports coherent S-Band Doppler tracking measurements, and can be modeled by the FDF. In order to meet the LRO metric tracking data specifications, the SCN ground stations employed previously uncertified numerically controlled tracking receivers. Initial certification testing revealed certain characteristics of the units that required resolution before being granted certification.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Campion, Richard
Socoby, Joseph
Hendry, Steve
Morinelli, Patrick J.
author_facet Campion, Richard
Socoby, Joseph
Hendry, Steve
Morinelli, Patrick J.
author_sort Campion, Richard
title Tracking Data Certification for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
title_short Tracking Data Certification for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
title_full Tracking Data Certification for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
title_fullStr Tracking Data Certification for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
title_full_unstemmed Tracking Data Certification for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
title_sort tracking data certification for the lunar reconnaissance orbiter
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20100017175
op_coverage Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available
long_lat ENVELOPE(-60.606,-60.606,-63.020,-63.020)
geographic Kiruna
South Point
geographic_facet Kiruna
South Point
genre Kiruna
genre_facet Kiruna
op_source CASI
op_relation Document ID: 20100017175
http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20100017175
op_rights Copyright, Distribution under U.S. Government purpose rights
_version_ 1766058349422444544