Fluid Inclusions in Extraterrestrial Samples Fact or Fiction?

Over the years there have been numerous reports of liquid inclusions in meteorites. Roedder reviews the reported occurrences of liquid inclusions in meteorites and states that "silicate-melt inclusions are expectable and apparently ubiquitous, but the presence of actual liquid inclusions (i.e.,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bodnar, R. J., Gibson, E. K., Zolensky, M. E.
Language:unknown
Published: 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20000088490
id ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:20000088490
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:20000088490 2023-05-15T13:51:22+02:00 Fluid Inclusions in Extraterrestrial Samples Fact or Fiction? Bodnar, R. J. Gibson, E. K. Zolensky, M. E. Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available [2000] application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20000088490 unknown Document ID: 20000088490 http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20000088490 No Copyright CASI Astrophysics 2000 ftnasantrs 2019-07-21T07:56:12Z Over the years there have been numerous reports of liquid inclusions in meteorites. Roedder reviews the reported occurrences of liquid inclusions in meteorites and states that "silicate-melt inclusions are expectable and apparently ubiquitous, but the presence of actual liquid inclusions (i.e., with moving bubbles at room temperature) would seem almost impossible." The reason for this conclusion is that meteorites (presumably) form in space at high temperatures and very low pressures where liquid water (or carbon dioxide) is not stable. Perhaps the most infamous report of fluid inclusions in meteorites was that of Warner et al. In that study, the authors reported the presence of two-phase, liquid-vapor inclusions in a diogenite from Antarctica. This report of fluid inclusions generated considerable interest in the meteorite community, and caused many to question existing models for the origin of the diogenites. This interest was short-lived however, as later investigations of the same samples showed that the inclusions were most likely artifacts. Rudnick et al. showed that many of the inclusions in meteorites prepared at the Johnson Space Center contained a fluid that fluoresced strongly under the laser beam on the Raman microprobe. They interpreted this to indicate that the inclusions contained Almag oil used in the preparation of thin sections. Presumably, the Almag oil entered empty vesicles along fractures that were opened intermittently during cutting. Here, the occurrence of unambiguous fluid inclusions that could not have been introduced during sample preparation are described in samples from two different extraterrestrial environments. One environment is represented by the SNC (martian) meteorites ALH 84001 and Nakhla. The second environment is represented by the Monahans 1998 meteorite that fell recently in the USA. Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctica NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
institution Open Polar
collection NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
op_collection_id ftnasantrs
language unknown
topic Astrophysics
spellingShingle Astrophysics
Bodnar, R. J.
Gibson, E. K.
Zolensky, M. E.
Fluid Inclusions in Extraterrestrial Samples Fact or Fiction?
topic_facet Astrophysics
description Over the years there have been numerous reports of liquid inclusions in meteorites. Roedder reviews the reported occurrences of liquid inclusions in meteorites and states that "silicate-melt inclusions are expectable and apparently ubiquitous, but the presence of actual liquid inclusions (i.e., with moving bubbles at room temperature) would seem almost impossible." The reason for this conclusion is that meteorites (presumably) form in space at high temperatures and very low pressures where liquid water (or carbon dioxide) is not stable. Perhaps the most infamous report of fluid inclusions in meteorites was that of Warner et al. In that study, the authors reported the presence of two-phase, liquid-vapor inclusions in a diogenite from Antarctica. This report of fluid inclusions generated considerable interest in the meteorite community, and caused many to question existing models for the origin of the diogenites. This interest was short-lived however, as later investigations of the same samples showed that the inclusions were most likely artifacts. Rudnick et al. showed that many of the inclusions in meteorites prepared at the Johnson Space Center contained a fluid that fluoresced strongly under the laser beam on the Raman microprobe. They interpreted this to indicate that the inclusions contained Almag oil used in the preparation of thin sections. Presumably, the Almag oil entered empty vesicles along fractures that were opened intermittently during cutting. Here, the occurrence of unambiguous fluid inclusions that could not have been introduced during sample preparation are described in samples from two different extraterrestrial environments. One environment is represented by the SNC (martian) meteorites ALH 84001 and Nakhla. The second environment is represented by the Monahans 1998 meteorite that fell recently in the USA.
author Bodnar, R. J.
Gibson, E. K.
Zolensky, M. E.
author_facet Bodnar, R. J.
Gibson, E. K.
Zolensky, M. E.
author_sort Bodnar, R. J.
title Fluid Inclusions in Extraterrestrial Samples Fact or Fiction?
title_short Fluid Inclusions in Extraterrestrial Samples Fact or Fiction?
title_full Fluid Inclusions in Extraterrestrial Samples Fact or Fiction?
title_fullStr Fluid Inclusions in Extraterrestrial Samples Fact or Fiction?
title_full_unstemmed Fluid Inclusions in Extraterrestrial Samples Fact or Fiction?
title_sort fluid inclusions in extraterrestrial samples fact or fiction?
publishDate 2000
url http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20000088490
op_coverage Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source CASI
op_relation Document ID: 20000088490
http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20000088490
op_rights No Copyright
_version_ 1766255202016428032