Role of Boreal Vegetation in Controlling Ecosystem Processes and Feedbacks to Climate

In the field, dark respiration rates are greatest in cores from more northerly locations. This is due in part to greater amounts of dwarf shrub biomass in the more northerly cores, but also to differences in soil organic matter quality. Laboratory incubations of these soils under common conditions s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chapin, F. S., III, Hooper, D. U., Verville, J. H., Hobbie, S. E.
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19980003337
id ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:19980003337
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnasantrs:oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:19980003337 2023-05-15T18:40:32+02:00 Role of Boreal Vegetation in Controlling Ecosystem Processes and Feedbacks to Climate Chapin, F. S., III Hooper, D. U. Verville, J. H. Hobbie, S. E. Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available 1997 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19980003337 unknown Document ID: 19980003337 http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19980003337 No Copyright CASI Environment Pollution NASA/CR-97-113018 NAS 1.26:113018 1997 ftnasantrs 2019-08-31T23:03:45Z In the field, dark respiration rates are greatest in cores from more northerly locations. This is due in part to greater amounts of dwarf shrub biomass in the more northerly cores, but also to differences in soil organic matter quality. Laboratory incubations of these soils under common conditions show some evidence for greater pools of available carbon in soils from more northerly tundra sites, although the most northerly site does not fit this pattern for reasons which are unclear at this time. While field measurements of cores transplanted among different vegetation types at the same location (Toolik Lake) show relatively small differences in whole ecosystem carbon flux, laboratory incubation of these same soils shows that there are large differences in soil respiration rates under common conditions. This is presumably due to differences in organic matter quality. Microenvironmental site factors (temperature, soil moisture, degree of anaerobiosis, etc.) may be responsible for evening out these differences in the field. These site factors, which differ with slope, aspect, and drainage within a given location along the latitudinal gradient, appear to exert at least as strong a control over carbon fluxes as do macroclimatic factors among sites across the latitudinal gradient. While our field measurements indicate that, in the short term, warming will tend to increase ecosystem losses Of CO2 via respiration more than they will increase plant gross assimilation, the degree to which different topographically-defined plant communities will respond is likely to vary. Other/Unknown Material Tundra NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
institution Open Polar
collection NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
op_collection_id ftnasantrs
language unknown
topic Environment Pollution
spellingShingle Environment Pollution
Chapin, F. S., III
Hooper, D. U.
Verville, J. H.
Hobbie, S. E.
Role of Boreal Vegetation in Controlling Ecosystem Processes and Feedbacks to Climate
topic_facet Environment Pollution
description In the field, dark respiration rates are greatest in cores from more northerly locations. This is due in part to greater amounts of dwarf shrub biomass in the more northerly cores, but also to differences in soil organic matter quality. Laboratory incubations of these soils under common conditions show some evidence for greater pools of available carbon in soils from more northerly tundra sites, although the most northerly site does not fit this pattern for reasons which are unclear at this time. While field measurements of cores transplanted among different vegetation types at the same location (Toolik Lake) show relatively small differences in whole ecosystem carbon flux, laboratory incubation of these same soils shows that there are large differences in soil respiration rates under common conditions. This is presumably due to differences in organic matter quality. Microenvironmental site factors (temperature, soil moisture, degree of anaerobiosis, etc.) may be responsible for evening out these differences in the field. These site factors, which differ with slope, aspect, and drainage within a given location along the latitudinal gradient, appear to exert at least as strong a control over carbon fluxes as do macroclimatic factors among sites across the latitudinal gradient. While our field measurements indicate that, in the short term, warming will tend to increase ecosystem losses Of CO2 via respiration more than they will increase plant gross assimilation, the degree to which different topographically-defined plant communities will respond is likely to vary.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Chapin, F. S., III
Hooper, D. U.
Verville, J. H.
Hobbie, S. E.
author_facet Chapin, F. S., III
Hooper, D. U.
Verville, J. H.
Hobbie, S. E.
author_sort Chapin, F. S., III
title Role of Boreal Vegetation in Controlling Ecosystem Processes and Feedbacks to Climate
title_short Role of Boreal Vegetation in Controlling Ecosystem Processes and Feedbacks to Climate
title_full Role of Boreal Vegetation in Controlling Ecosystem Processes and Feedbacks to Climate
title_fullStr Role of Boreal Vegetation in Controlling Ecosystem Processes and Feedbacks to Climate
title_full_unstemmed Role of Boreal Vegetation in Controlling Ecosystem Processes and Feedbacks to Climate
title_sort role of boreal vegetation in controlling ecosystem processes and feedbacks to climate
publishDate 1997
url http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19980003337
op_coverage Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available
genre Tundra
genre_facet Tundra
op_source CASI
op_relation Document ID: 19980003337
http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19980003337
op_rights No Copyright
_version_ 1766229921403764736