Meteorite concentrations in Antarctica: How complete is the picture?

• Main Author: Annexstad, J. O.
• Format: Other/Unknown Material
• Language: unknown
• Published: 1984
• Subjects: 91; Antarctic; Allan Hills; Whillans; Cassidy; Tabor; Thiel Mountains; Antarc*; Antarctica; ice core; Ice Sheet
• Online Access: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19850007335

The importance of ice sheet flow as part of the process of concentrating meteorites in Antarctica is discussed. Ford and Tabor were the first to surmise that some type of ice sheet transport of Antarctic meteorites was likely considering that the Thiel Mountains pallasite was found on glacier ice without evidence of impact. It was found that meteorites were carried by the ice to regions of high ablation where they were periodically uncovered. Three models of concentration have been proposed to explain the phenomena of meteorite accumulations on blue ice fields. Model 1, is a general picture relating meteorite fall and accumulation to the entire Antarctic continent. Model 2 is based upon the petrographic examination of an 8m ice core from the Allan Hills Icefield and suggests a local origin of ice from the catchment basin. The third model is presented by Whillans and Cassidy who infer, by using conventional ice flow concepts, a path length as long as 1,000km from the sites of fall to recovery for Allan Hills specimens. Despite achievement of these working hypotheses, a number of questions must be resolved before a comprehensive model can be presented.