Impact of surface current and temperature feedback on kinetic energy over the North-East Atlantic from a coupled ocean / atmospheric boundary layer model

• Published in: Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans
• Main Authors: Brivoal, Théo, Samson, Guillaume, Giordani, Hervé, Bourdallé-Badie, Romain, Lemarié, Florian, Madec, Gurvan
• Other Authors: Centre national de recherches météorologiques (CNRM), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Mercator Océan International (MOi), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Service Hydrographique et Océanographique de la Marine (SHOM), Ministère de la défense (1936-.)-Ministère de la défense (1936-.)-United Kingdom Met Office Exeter -Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center Bergen (NERSC)-National Research Council of Italy, Mathematics and computing applied to oceanic and atmospheric flows (AIRSEA), Inria Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann (LJK), Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Nucleus for European Modeling of the Ocean (NEMO R&D), Laboratoire d'Océanographie et du Climat : Expérimentations et Approches Numériques (LOCEAN), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut Pierre-Simon-Laplace (IPSL (FR_636)), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X), Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris)-Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-École polytechnique (X), Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris)-Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut Pierre-Simon-Laplace (IPSL (FR_636)), Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris)-Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), European Project: 821926,IMMERSE(2018)
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: HAL CCSD 2024
• Subjects: Ocean atmosphere coupling; Current feedback; Thermal feedback; Atmospheric boundary layer; [SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics]; North East Atlantic
• Online Access: https://hal.science/hal-04650173; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2024.101464

International audience A one-dimensional Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL1D) model is coupled with the NEMO ocean model and implemented over the Iberian–Biscay–Ireland (IBI) area at 1/36° resolution to investigate the damping effect of the current and the thermal feedback on the kinetic energy (KE) at the mesoscale. This type of coupling between an ocean model and an ABL1D is a newly proposed approach as an alternative of intermediate complexity between bulk forcing and full coupling with an atmosphere model. In ABL1D, the prognostic tracers are nudged toward large-scale variables and the wind is guided by a low-frequency geostrophic wind provided from the ERA-Interim reanalyses. First, the ABL1D is successfully validated against satellite observations regarding the wind, and the dynamic coupling coefficient (linking the near surface wind and wind-stress to the of the surface currents) are consistent with the literature, over the period 2016–2017. Our results show that the thermal feedback has a negligible impact on kinetic energy (KE) and does not influence the strength of the current feedback in the region. Given the ABL1D physics, this further indicates that the changes in the vertical wind structure caused by CFB are primarily governed by local mechanical mechanisms associated with surface wind-stress condition, rather than by thermodynamic or non-local processes within the planetary boundary layer. The induced KE reduction by the current feedback amounts to 14% at the surface and propagates down to 2000 m, indicating that it can modify the vertical distribution of KE throughout the water column. KE reductions in the surface boundary layer (0 – 300 m) and in the interior (300 – 2000 m) are attributed to a reduction of the surface wind work by 4%, and of the pressure work by 7%, respectively. The Ekman pumping anomalies induced by the current feedback tend to attenuate eddy activity and horizontal pressure gradients at depth, illustrating the potential of the current feedback to induce a geostrophic ...