Living together - communities and ecosystems

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, frustrated pastoralists in South Australia, New South Wales and Queensland fenced their properties to stop the Australian dingo (Canis lupus) killing their livestock. Eventually links formed between individual fences, creating a continuous barrier now c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bowen, B., Ladd, P.G.
Other Authors: Calver, M.C., Lymbery, A., McComb, J.A., Bamford, M.
Format: Book Part
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/esploro/outputs/bookChapter/Living-together---communities-and-ecosystems/991005542284007891
id ftmurdochunivall:oai:alma.61MUN_INST:11135752000007891
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmurdochunivall:oai:alma.61MUN_INST:11135752000007891 2024-09-15T18:01:23+00:00 Living together - communities and ecosystems Bowen, B. Ladd, P.G. Calver, M.C. Lymbery, A. McComb, J.A. Bamford, M. 2009 https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/esploro/outputs/bookChapter/Living-together---communities-and-ecosystems/991005542284007891 eng eng Cambridge University Press Port Melbourne ispartof: Environmental Biology spage 384 epage 408 991005542284007891 https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/esploro/outputs/bookChapter/Living-together---communities-and-ecosystems/991005542284007891 alma:61MUN_INST/bibs/991005542284007891 © Michael Calver, Alan Lymbery, Jennifer McComb, Michael Bamford text Book Section 2009 ftmurdochunivall 2024-08-15T00:52:51Z During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, frustrated pastoralists in South Australia, New South Wales and Queensland fenced their properties to stop the Australian dingo (Canis lupus) killing their livestock. Eventually links formed between individual fences, creating a continuous barrier now covering over 5000 km. Known variously as the Dingo Fence ‘Dingo Barrier Fence or ‘Wild Dog Fence it is of wire mesh standing 1.8 in high, with a further 30cm buried. There is a 5 m wide cleared buffer on each side and the entire structure is well maintained. On the New South Wales side of the fence where sheep are the main livestock, dingoes are controlled and numbers are low, whereas on the South Australian side dingoes are tolerated alongside cattle husbandry. Unintentionally, the fence initiated a large-scale experiment, allowing biologists to assess the biological consequences of removing a large predator. Alan Newsome and his colleagues from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) studied vertebrate abundances on either side of the fence by counting animal tracks at stock watering points. One striking finding was that the introduced predator the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) was present on both sides, but in higher numbers in the absence of dingoes. Dingoes eat foxes and drive them away, explaining the differences in fox numbers across the fence. Foxes threaten several native Australian mammals (see Chapters 2 and 16), including many borrowers and diggers important in soil turnover, nutrient cycling and dispersing plants. It may be that, by regulating fox numbers, dingoes are protecting native fauna that in turn modify the environment to the benefit of many soil organisms. The case of the Dingo Barrier Fence shows how relationships between organisms determine the range and relative abundance of species. Book Part Canis lupus Murdoch University Research Portal
institution Open Polar
collection Murdoch University Research Portal
op_collection_id ftmurdochunivall
language English
description During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, frustrated pastoralists in South Australia, New South Wales and Queensland fenced their properties to stop the Australian dingo (Canis lupus) killing their livestock. Eventually links formed between individual fences, creating a continuous barrier now covering over 5000 km. Known variously as the Dingo Fence ‘Dingo Barrier Fence or ‘Wild Dog Fence it is of wire mesh standing 1.8 in high, with a further 30cm buried. There is a 5 m wide cleared buffer on each side and the entire structure is well maintained. On the New South Wales side of the fence where sheep are the main livestock, dingoes are controlled and numbers are low, whereas on the South Australian side dingoes are tolerated alongside cattle husbandry. Unintentionally, the fence initiated a large-scale experiment, allowing biologists to assess the biological consequences of removing a large predator. Alan Newsome and his colleagues from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) studied vertebrate abundances on either side of the fence by counting animal tracks at stock watering points. One striking finding was that the introduced predator the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) was present on both sides, but in higher numbers in the absence of dingoes. Dingoes eat foxes and drive them away, explaining the differences in fox numbers across the fence. Foxes threaten several native Australian mammals (see Chapters 2 and 16), including many borrowers and diggers important in soil turnover, nutrient cycling and dispersing plants. It may be that, by regulating fox numbers, dingoes are protecting native fauna that in turn modify the environment to the benefit of many soil organisms. The case of the Dingo Barrier Fence shows how relationships between organisms determine the range and relative abundance of species.
author2 Calver, M.C.
Lymbery, A.
McComb, J.A.
Bamford, M.
format Book Part
author Bowen, B.
Ladd, P.G.
spellingShingle Bowen, B.
Ladd, P.G.
Living together - communities and ecosystems
author_facet Bowen, B.
Ladd, P.G.
author_sort Bowen, B.
title Living together - communities and ecosystems
title_short Living together - communities and ecosystems
title_full Living together - communities and ecosystems
title_fullStr Living together - communities and ecosystems
title_full_unstemmed Living together - communities and ecosystems
title_sort living together - communities and ecosystems
publisher Cambridge University Press
publishDate 2009
url https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/esploro/outputs/bookChapter/Living-together---communities-and-ecosystems/991005542284007891
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_relation ispartof: Environmental Biology spage 384 epage 408
991005542284007891
https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/esploro/outputs/bookChapter/Living-together---communities-and-ecosystems/991005542284007891
alma:61MUN_INST/bibs/991005542284007891
op_rights © Michael Calver, Alan Lymbery, Jennifer McComb, Michael Bamford
_version_ 1810438542323613696