Ambiguity Affirmed: Commentary on the Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland of 18 May 2021

The text comments on the European Court of Human Rights judgement of 18 May 2021 in the case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and others v. Iceland. The case is another judgement of the ECtHR dealing with the phenomenon of surrogate motherhood. Indeed, the legal consequences of surrogate motherhood vary and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Law, Identity and Values
Main Authors: Kowalski, Michał, Masłowiec, Maria
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Central European Academic Publishing 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.mtak.hu/index.php/live/article/view/15327
https://doi.org/10.55073/2023.1.131-144
id ftmtakojs:oai:ojs3.mtak.hu:article/15327
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmtakojs:oai:ojs3.mtak.hu:article/15327 2024-04-28T08:25:35+00:00 Ambiguity Affirmed: Commentary on the Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland of 18 May 2021 Kowalski, Michał Masłowiec, Maria 2023-06-28 application/pdf https://ojs.mtak.hu/index.php/live/article/view/15327 https://doi.org/10.55073/2023.1.131-144 eng eng Central European Academic Publishing https://ojs.mtak.hu/index.php/live/article/view/15327/12741 https://ojs.mtak.hu/index.php/live/article/view/15327 doi:10.55073/2023.1.131-144 Law, Identity and Values; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023); 131-144 Law, Identity and Values; Évf. 3 szám 1 (2023); 131-144 2786-3840 2786-2542 surrogacy adoption foreign civil status registration ECtHR info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2023 ftmtakojs https://doi.org/10.55073/2023.1.131-144 2024-04-09T14:41:00Z The text comments on the European Court of Human Rights judgement of 18 May 2021 in the case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and others v. Iceland. The case is another judgement of the ECtHR dealing with the phenomenon of surrogate motherhood. Indeed, the legal consequences of surrogate motherhood vary and result in challenges both in national and international legal contexts. The judgement commented on is of high importance as it dealt with links between surrogate motherhood and adoption, as well as illustrated modern challenges for civil status registration. The text provides for an in-depth analysis of the judgement concerned and identifies some ambiguity and lack of consistence in the Court’s approach to surrogate motherhood. In the course of its analysis the Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and others case is assessed as a lost chance in this respect. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland MTAK Folyorat-Szerkesztö Rendszer (Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvtára) Law, Identity and Values 3 1 131 144
institution Open Polar
collection MTAK Folyorat-Szerkesztö Rendszer (Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvtára)
op_collection_id ftmtakojs
language English
topic surrogacy
adoption
foreign civil status registration
ECtHR
spellingShingle surrogacy
adoption
foreign civil status registration
ECtHR
Kowalski, Michał
Masłowiec, Maria
Ambiguity Affirmed: Commentary on the Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland of 18 May 2021
topic_facet surrogacy
adoption
foreign civil status registration
ECtHR
description The text comments on the European Court of Human Rights judgement of 18 May 2021 in the case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and others v. Iceland. The case is another judgement of the ECtHR dealing with the phenomenon of surrogate motherhood. Indeed, the legal consequences of surrogate motherhood vary and result in challenges both in national and international legal contexts. The judgement commented on is of high importance as it dealt with links between surrogate motherhood and adoption, as well as illustrated modern challenges for civil status registration. The text provides for an in-depth analysis of the judgement concerned and identifies some ambiguity and lack of consistence in the Court’s approach to surrogate motherhood. In the course of its analysis the Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and others case is assessed as a lost chance in this respect.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kowalski, Michał
Masłowiec, Maria
author_facet Kowalski, Michał
Masłowiec, Maria
author_sort Kowalski, Michał
title Ambiguity Affirmed: Commentary on the Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland of 18 May 2021
title_short Ambiguity Affirmed: Commentary on the Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland of 18 May 2021
title_full Ambiguity Affirmed: Commentary on the Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland of 18 May 2021
title_fullStr Ambiguity Affirmed: Commentary on the Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland of 18 May 2021
title_full_unstemmed Ambiguity Affirmed: Commentary on the Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland of 18 May 2021
title_sort ambiguity affirmed: commentary on the judgement of the european court of human rights in the case of valdís fjölnisdóttir and others v. iceland of 18 may 2021
publisher Central European Academic Publishing
publishDate 2023
url https://ojs.mtak.hu/index.php/live/article/view/15327
https://doi.org/10.55073/2023.1.131-144
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Law, Identity and Values; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023); 131-144
Law, Identity and Values; Évf. 3 szám 1 (2023); 131-144
2786-3840
2786-2542
op_relation https://ojs.mtak.hu/index.php/live/article/view/15327/12741
https://ojs.mtak.hu/index.php/live/article/view/15327
doi:10.55073/2023.1.131-144
op_doi https://doi.org/10.55073/2023.1.131-144
container_title Law, Identity and Values
container_volume 3
container_issue 1
container_start_page 131
op_container_end_page 144
_version_ 1797585356698157056